社區健康和醫療設施、街道安全、公共空間和庇護所,以減少無家可歸者債券
健康、安全、蓬勃的三藩市債券。為了購置或改善不動產提供資金,包括:臨時庇護所,特別是針對家庭的庇護所;提供醫療服務的設施,包括預防性保健和行為健康服務,例如華埠公共衛生局;Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院和創傷中心以及Laguna Honda醫院的重大維修、翻新和抗震升級;行人和街道安全改善,街景提升和其他公共空間改善;並支付相關費用;三藩市市縣是否應該發行3.9億美元的一般義務債券,從發行日期起為期最多30年,預估平均稅率為每100美元物業估值0.0069美元,預計平均年收入為3,100萬美元,並接受獨立公民監督和定期審計?市府目前的債務管理政策是隨著舊債券的清償和稅基的增長發行新債券,將市府一般義務債券的物業稅稅率保持在2006年的稅率以下,然而該稅率可能會因其他因素而變化。
本提案需要有662⁄3%的贊成票才能獲得通過。 然而,若選民同時通過州提案5,則本提案需要有55%的贊成票便可通過。
摘要由選票簡釋委員會撰寫
現況:
市府提供並維護公共設施和基礎設施。
市府可以發行經選民批准的一般義務債券來協助資助這些項目。
公民一般義務債券監督委員會審查債券收益的開支情況。
建議:
提案B是一項債券提案,允許市府透過發行一般義務債券,最多可借貸3.9億元資金。市府將資助:
- 高達9,910萬美元用於購置或改善社區健康中心,包括高達7,110萬美元用於華埠公共衛生局的抗震改造和翻新,以及高達2,800萬美元用於搬遷市立診所;
- 高達6,600萬美元用於維修和翻新Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院和創傷中心(總醫院)以及Laguna Honda醫院和康復中心;
- 高達4,000萬美元用於總醫院的抗震改造;
- 高達6,390萬美元用於街道和人行道安全專案;
- 高達4,100萬美元用於改善及現代化三藩市市中心的公共空間;
- 高達2,500萬美元用於Harvey Milk廣場;
- 高達500萬美元用於公園和休閒中心;以及
- 高達5,000萬美元用於庇護所或臨時住房,以減少家庭無家可歸現象。
提案B要求公民一般義務債券監督委員會審查債券資金的開支情況。
市府政策是在還清先前的債券後才發行新債券,以此限制借貸金額。如有必要,允許提高物業稅稅率,也允許房東將至多50%的增加物業稅轉嫁給租客。
投「贊成」票的意思是:如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您同意市府發行高達3.9億美元的一般義務債券,用於資助與社區健康和醫療設施、街道安全、公共空間,以及減少家庭無家可歸現象的臨時住房的相關專案。
投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您不同意市府發行這些債券。
市主計官對提案「B」的意見書
市主計官Greg Wagner就提案B對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明:
如果按照目前的假設,批准和出售提議的3.9億美元一般義務債券(「提議的一般義務債券」),其大致成本如下:
a) 在2025–2026財政年度(財年),即發行第一輪債券後,根據對發行債券所需稅收的最佳估算,物業稅稅率將為每100美元估值0.0040美元(每10萬美元4.00美元)。
b) 在2029–2030財政年度,即發行最後一輪債券之後的最高預估稅率年,根據對發行債券所需稅收的最佳估算,物業稅稅率將為每100美元估值0.0101美元(每10萬美元10.10美元)。
c) 如果提議的3.9億元一般義務債券全數發行並出售,則連本帶利需要償還的債務總額的最佳估算約為7.37億美元。
d) 從2025–2026財年到2046–2047財年的整個預計期限,這些債券平均稅率的最佳估算為每100美元的估值0.0069美元(每10萬美元6.90美元)。
e) 根據這些估算,對於房屋估值70萬美元的業主而言,這些債券的最高年度物業稅成本估計約為70美元。
市憲章規定,在任何時間內,市府一般義務債券(「市府一般義務債券」)的未償還金額不得超過本市應課稅物業估值的3%。由三藩市社區大學區、三藩市聯合校區和灣區捷運(BART)或其他非市府個體發行的債券不會計入市憲章的限額。截至2024年6月30日, 市府一般義務債券的未償還金額為22億美元(相當於城市應稅物業估值的0.6%)。另外還有16億美元的市府一般義務債券已獲授權但尚未發行。如果提議的一般義務債券獲得選民批准,(i) 未償還和 (ii) 已授權但未發行的市府一般義務債券總額將為42億美元,約佔本市應課稅物業估值的1.2%。這項計算乃假定選民授權的所有債券均已發行,包括提議的一般義務債券提案。
市府目前的非約束性債務管理政策是隨著舊債券的清償和稅基的增長發行新債券,將市府一般義務債券的物業稅稅率保持在2005–2006年的稅率以下,然而該稅率可能會因其他因素而變化。基於這項政策,如果本提案獲得選民批准,預計市府一般義務債券的物業稅徵收不會令市府一般義務債券的物業稅稅率超過2006財年的水平。
根據現行法律,房東可將一般義務債券的部分償還費用轉嫁給租客。允許轉嫁的金額取決於租約開始日期等因素。租金委員會每年都會公佈轉嫁費用的相關資訊。
這些估算僅基於預測,對市府沒有約束力。由於債券出售的時間、每次出售的債券金額以及債券償還期內的實際估值不同,預測和估算可能有異。因此,實際稅率和稅率適用的年份可能與上述估算不同。
市府在管理擬議的一般義務債券計劃時,會產生與工作人員時間相關的名義上成本。市府某些可資本化的員工成本(即與建設或收購相關資產直接有關的員工成本)可能有資格從債券收益中獲得報銷,因此並不會增加市府的成本。
提案「B」如何被列入選票
2024年7月23日,市議會以11票對0票通過將提案B列入選票。市議會的投票如下:
贊成:Chan、Dorsey、Engardio、Mandelman、Melgar、Peskin、Preston、Ronen、Safai、Stefani、Walton。
反對:無。
以上陳述是本提案的中立分析。贊成和反對本提案的論據在本文後刊登。所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition B
贊成提案B,建設健康、安全、蓬勃的三藩市
自疫情以來,三藩市面臨了前所未有的挑戰,但是我們也展現了非凡的復原力。過去幾年的情況顯示,所有三藩市人所依賴的公共衛生和安全基礎設施至關重要。
提案B是一項3.9億美元的一般義務債券,將進行關鍵投資,以修復和提升我們的公立醫院和診所,減少家庭無家可歸的現象,並且改善道路、街道安全和公共空間。
提案B不會增加物業稅。提案B將作出明智、急需的投資,以保護我們的健康和安全。
提案B要求嚴格的透明度、向公眾全面披露所有支出、年度獨立審查、審計,以及向公民一般義務債券監督委員會提交報告。
提案B加強我們的公立醫院和診所:
- 對Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院進行緊急的抗震和安全改善,該醫院是三藩市唯一的一級創傷中心,也是地震或重大危機時的城市災難應變中心。
- 將Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院精神科緊急服務的容量提高一倍,增加精神保健服務的使用需求。
- 確保Laguna Honda醫院和康復中心的關鍵基礎設施和抗震維修,保持醫院營運,滿足嚴格的州和聯邦監管要求,以提供最高品質的醫療服務。
- 擴大華埠公共衛生局和市立診所需要的服務容量。
提案B為無家可歸家庭增建庇護所和住房:
- 為有子女或孕婦的家庭提供2,300多套新住房,以消除家庭無家可歸的現象為目標。
- 提供330多套急需的新庇護所和過渡性住房。
提案B改善街道和行人安全:
- 提供資金以改善行人穿越道和人行道的安全和路面重鋪。
為了健康、安全、蓬勃的三藩市,對提案B投贊成票!
市長London Breed
市議會主席Aaron Peskin
市議員Connie Chan
市議員Matt Dorsey
市議員Joel Engardio
市議員Rafael Mandelman
市議員Myrna Melgar
市議員Dean Preston
市議員Hillary Ronen
市議員Ahsha Safaí
市議員Catherine Stefani
市議員Shamann Walton
www.HealthyVibrantSF.com
Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition B
三藩市,一個不到80萬名居民的城市,每年的預算卻超過150億美元。即使考慮到高昂的生活成本之後,我們的人均支出比同級的綜合市縣高出40%。納稅人慷慨,卻換來多名
政府官員因腐敗而被起訴,市政服務持續下降,三藩市在一項排名中被冠名為「美國管理最差的城市」。
建設和維護公共基礎設施是政府的一項基本職能,但是提案B顯然是一次又一次地讓我們失望的相同方法:沒有任何真正的監督就向問題投擲金錢,然後祈求那些荷包賺足的特殊利益團體能作出解救。這就是為什麼技術進步使幾乎所有其他行業都達到更高的效率,但是公共專案的成本卻不斷上升。這也是為什麼三藩市今天的居民人數有所減少,但是政府僱員和承包商卻比六年前更多。
除非選民向我們的民選官員發出明確的訊息,亦即如果不進行有意義的監督改革,我們不會批准新的開支,否則我們的城市還是會和以前一樣,一個帳篷花費6萬美元、一個垃圾
桶上花費2萬美元、一個公廁花費170萬美元。投票反對提案B。
Briones 協會
www.brionessociety.org
Opponent's Argument Against Proposition B
三藩市在無家可歸者問題上的支出已經超過了國內幾乎所有其他城市,但是街頭危機持續惡化。這筆3.9億美元的新債券要求選民向一個已被證實無效而且管理不善的系統投入更多資金。
我們認同,三藩市必須將重點放在庇護所、康復和心理健康服務上。但是,市府應重新分配現有資源,而不是讓納稅人承擔額外債務。2018年通過的提案C旨在從總收入稅中設立專項基金來解決無家可歸問題。但是這些錢都花到哪裡去了?我們需要進行改革,以確保資金有效地分配給那些影響力高、能帶來實際成果的計劃,而不是一遇到問題就投擲金錢。
此外,許多目前接受市府資助的非營利機構並不達到績效目標,有些被指控欺詐,有些則在助長和吸引毒品遊客。現在是時候要這些機構承擔責任,取消那些表現不佳機構的撥款,並將這些資源轉用於真正有效的計劃。
發行債券不是解決方案。它只是昂貴的藥水膠布(Band-Aid),遮蓋了我們目前系統中存在的真正問題。三藩市選民在同意為無家可歸者服務再提供3.9億美元之前,應該先要求問責和有效的改革。
投票反對提案B。
Briones 協會
www.brionessociety.org
Rebuttal to Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition B
提案B是一項財務明智的投資,旨在改善公立醫院急需的抗震安全,並擴建無家可歸家庭的庇護所。
提案B不會增加物業稅,並全面公開揭露所有支出。
提案B每年接受獨立審查、審計,並向公民一般義務債券監督委員會報告。作為納稅人,我們可以直接查閱這些報告和審計。
提案B負責任地投資於我們的健康和安全基礎設施。
- 對Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院進行緊急的抗震和安全改善,該醫院是地震或重大危機時的城市災難應變中心。
- 將Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院精神科緊急服務的容量提高一倍,擴大精神保健設施的使用需求。
- 對Laguna Honda醫院和康復中心進行必要的抗震改造,以確保醫院能符合嚴格的州和聯邦監管要求,繼續營運並提供最高品質的服務。
- 擴大華埠公共衛生局和市立診所需要的服務容量。
- 為有孩子或孕婦的家庭增加2,300多套新住房,以及330多套急需的新家庭庇護所和過渡性住房,目標是要消除家庭無家可歸現象。
提案B不會增加您的稅金。提案B將使我們的公立醫院更安全,並擴展無家可歸家庭的住房和庇護所。
市長London Breed
Susan Ehrlich,Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院和創傷中心首席執行官*
www.HealthyVibrantSF.com
*僅供身份識別之用;作者以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition B
1
贊成提案B的付費論據
提案B為ZUCKERBERG三藩市總醫院提供重要的抗震升級改造
Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院是本市公共衛生系統的核心,為每位來就醫的人,無論支付能力如何,提供重要的醫療服務。提案B將確保我們的醫院繼續成為希望和關懷的燈塔。
作為本市唯一的一級創傷中心,我們的醫院全天候提供拯救生命的服務。我們敬業的員工,孜孜不倦地為有需要的人提供優質的護理。然而,我們的設施需要進行重大升級,以持續滿足社區日益增加的需求。
提案B將投資4,000萬美元對我們的院區進行抗震升級,確保在地震發生時的安全和運作。這項投資對於保護我們的患者、員工和我們護理的完整性至關重要。此外,還將投入6,600萬美元進行重要的維修和翻新,處理延期維修問題,更新我們的基礎設施,以跟上醫療護理的發展。
進行這些投資不會增加任何稅收,並有嚴格的財務監督、審計和問責制。
投票贊成提案B,您就是支持:
- 防震安全:保護醫院結構的完整性,以抵禦地震,保障病人和員工的安全。
- 將精神科緊急服務的容量提高一倍:增加所需的心理保健服務。
- 現代設施:升級過時的系統和設施,加強病人護理,確保符合衛生和安全標準。
- 無間斷服務:確保我們的醫院能夠在緊急情況期間和之後提供不間斷的優質護理。
這些改善對於每一位三藩市人的健康和安全至關重要。當您或您的親人需要重症護理時,我們的醫院將隨時準備提供安全有效的護理。
與我們一起支持提案B,加強Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院的實力。
Susan Ehrlich醫生,Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院首席執行官*
三藩市總醫院基金會
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
2
贊成提案B的付費論據
提案B是對公立醫院基礎設施的明智投資,不會增加我們的稅收
作為三藩市的納稅人,我們支持提案B,因為它不會提高物業稅,同時還會作出明智、極為需要的投資,以便:
-
維修我們的公立醫院和診所並進行抗震升級,包括Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院和Laguna Honda醫院。
- 為孕婦或有孩子的家庭提供2,300多套新住房,以及330多套急需的新家庭庇護所和過渡性住房,。
提案B要求嚴格的透明度、全面披露所有支出、獨立審查、審計,以及向公民一般義務債券監督委員會提交報告。
市府目前的債務管理政策是只在舊債券清償後發行新債券,以將市府一般義務債券的物業稅稅率保持在2006年的稅率以下。這表示您不會繳納新稅。
提案B具有明智的財政意識,確保我們納稅人對債券支出有明確的監督。
三藩市總商會
加州審計長Malia Cohen
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
3
贊成提案B的付費論據
提案B確保華埠公共衛生局進行急需的抗震升級工程
半個多世紀以來,三藩市華埠公共衛生局一直是我們華裔和移民社區的支柱。提案B確保在不增稅的情況下,繼續提供符合文化要求和便捷的醫療保健服務。
華埠公共衛生局不僅是健康中心,還是數千三藩市人的生命線 - 他們依賴華埠公共衛生局提供的基本醫療、牙科保健、心理健康支援等服務。由於80%的患者以中文為母語,診所是我們的移民社區獲得優質醫療服務的重要橋樑。
然而,目前的設施陳舊過時,而且容易受到地震的影響。提案B會撥款7,100萬美元進行翻新和抗震升級,將它改造成一個現代化、安全、有效率的醫療保健中心。
提案B還將對華埠公共衛生局進行升級,確保能夠抵禦地震。本提案將使我們能夠增加醫療檢查室、行為健康諮詢室和牙科服務區的數量,更好地滿足社區的需求。它也將幫助我們採用最先進的空氣品質和通風系統,確保為所有人提供安全健康的環境。
這些改善對於一所綜合性及跨世代的醫療場所,對維護三藩市亞裔美國人社區的健康和福祉至關重要。
請投票贊成提案B,以確保我們能在不增加新稅的情況下,繼續為多元化的亞裔和移民社區世世代代提供必要的醫療保健服務!
Sunny Pak醫生,華埠公共衛生局前總監
Albert Yu醫生,華埠公共衛生局前總監
Annie Chung,安老自助處主席兼首席執行官
Kent Woo,華人健康組織聯會執行總監
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
4
贊成提案B的付費論據
提案B支持同性戀社群的健康
提案B將使市立診所能夠繼續發揮重要作用,照顧同性戀社群的健康、預防和管理疾病爆發,以及降低性病感染率。
在三藩市,我們對公共衛生的承諾從未像現在這樣重要。提案B將會為加強和擴大我們的公共衛生基礎設施提供必要的資金,確保我們能夠繼續保護和服務本市的每一位居民。
這項努力的基石是三藩市市立診所,其性健康服務是全國的典範,也是我們同性戀社區的生命線。100多年來,市立診所一直以患者為中心,提供富有同情心的醫療服務,為患者提供低門檻的HIV檢測、性病篩檢及治療和預防服務。它一直站在突破性研究的前線,在三藩市公共衛生應對2022年猴痘爆發等危機中扮演了關鍵的角色。
儘管地位重要,市立診所目前的營運場所是一棟近100年歷史的消防站舊址,陳舊的設施無法滿足員工和患者的需求。建築物缺乏足夠的空間、適當的通風,也不符合美國殘障人士法案的標準,影響了醫療品質和安全。
提案B將撥款2,800萬美元為市立診所購置新設施,改造成設備齊全的現代化醫療中心。這項投資會:
- 提高現場化驗檢測能力,確保為患者提供更快、更準確的結果。
- 提供符合美國殘障人士法案標準的設施,為所有人創造溫馨而包容的環境。
- 採用最先進的空氣品質和通風系統,保護患者和員工免受空氣傳播疾病的侵害。
重要的是,提案B是一項財政負責的提案,不會增加稅收,具有高度的透明和問責標準,包括獨立的年度審查、審計以及向公民一般義務債券監督委員會報告。
投票贊成提案B。
州參議員Scott Wiener
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
5
贊成提案B的付費論據
加入Harvey Milk廣場之友的行列,以提案B建設充滿活力的社區空間
提案A提供2,500萬美元在Castro的Muni站重建Harvey Milk廣場,這是一項明智的投資,旨在建設一個充滿活力、更方便、更安全的集會場所,包括新的綠化地、休憩場所,以及位於Castro和Market的中央廣場。Harvey Milk是三藩市的全球大使,值得擁有一個世界級的公民空間來紀念他的歷史,以他傳遞的社會正義、包容和希望的訊息激勵所有人。
投票贊成提案B,這是一個千載難逢的機會,在這個具歷史性的進步派社會行動的中心,為LGBTQ群體和個人建立全國首個大型紀念館。
在harveymilkplaza.org瞭解更多。
Harvey Milk Plaza之友
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
6
贊成提案B的付費論據
民主黨領袖支持提案B,對公共衛生設施進行抗震升級,並擴大無家可歸家庭的庇護所
作為民主黨的領袖和建設更美好三藩市的堅定倡議者,我們相信提案B對於解決本市最緊迫的問題至關重要。我們共同的價值觀促使我們支持這項債券提案,因為它蘊含了全面和變革的潛力。
- 提案B將資助三藩市總醫院和Laguna Honda醫院等公共衛生設施的重要升級,確保這些設施安全、通行無障礙,並有能力為所有居民,尤其是最弱勢社區提供服務。
- 提案B為無家可歸家庭增加庇護所和住房,為孕婦或有孩子的家庭提供2,300多套新住房,以便消除家庭無家可歸現象。
- 提案B進行重大的街道安全改善,為所有人創造安全的社區環境。
- 提案B投資創造充滿活力的公共空間,促進社區聯繫和經濟活力。
透過升級改造本市公共衛生和公共空間的基礎設施,我們不僅解決了燃眉之急,還為建設一個富有韌力、欣欣向榮的三藩市奠定了基礎。
最後,提案B不會提高物業稅稅率,因為市府的政策是在清償舊債券後才發行新債券,以便保持稅率不變。
我們敦促您投票贊成提案B。
Vallie Brown,前市議員
Carrie Barnes,三藩市民主黨副主席
Emma Heiken Hare,三藩市民主黨副主席
Lanier Coles,三藩市民主黨總監
Peter Gallotta,三藩市民主黨成員
Lily Ho,三藩市民主黨成員
Bilal Mahmood,三藩市民主黨成員
Marjan Philhour,三藩市民主黨成員
Jade Tu,三藩市民主黨成員
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
7
贊成提案B的付費論據
小企業支持提案B
作為本地經濟的支柱,小企業在充滿活力、安全和維護良好的社區中蓬勃發展。透過投資關鍵的基礎設施和公共空間,提案B為我們的企業提供良好的經營環境,確保未來商業的蓬勃發展。
小企業依靠整潔的街道、無障礙的公共空間和安全的環境來吸引顧客並提供優質服務。提案B將投資改善街道安全,確保行人、自行車騎士和駕駛人士能在本市安全地行走。這些改善措施不僅能保護我們的社區,還能鼓勵更多的人流,對於本地企業至關重要。
此外,提案B還將資助我們公共空間(包括公園、廣場和商業走廊)的關鍵維護和升級。這些投資將使我們的社區更有吸引力、更受歡迎,進而吸引居民和遊客。
債券資金也將優先用於提升公共空間的安全和活力,包括Powell街和附近的纜車轉彎處以及Harvey Milk廣場。透過提高這些區域的吸引力和便利度,提案B將有助於推動市中心和商業區的復甦。
提案B是一項針對三藩市小企業未來的策略性投資。它應對了改善基礎設施的迫切需求,同時為長期經濟成長和穩定奠定基礎。
提案B得到企業的支持,因為它不徵收新稅,並有嚴格的財政監督和問責機制。
三藩市地區商人協會理事會
卡斯楚商人協會
加州夜生活協會
Polk區商人協會
Sharky Laguana,小企業委員會前主席*
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
8
贊成提案B的付費論據
贊成提案B,支持市中心復甦和經濟成長。
提案B是對三藩市經濟未來的重要投資,支持市中心復甦、創造就業機會,並促進旅遊業發展。這些針對基礎設施和公共空間的重要投資將有助於三藩市保持世界級商業和旅遊目的地的地位。
提案B在不增稅的情況下支持市中心的復甦!
提案B資助重要的街道安全強化措施,使我們的街道對每個人更安全,並營造一個更有活力、出行更方便的城市。這些改善將鼓勵更多人到我們的街區遊覽和消磨時光,直接支持當地企業並推動經濟成長。
提案B也使我們的商業街區更加吸引,以支持重振市中心的努力。公共空間的升級和基礎設施的改善將有助於吸引企業和旅客回歸,促進市中心的經濟繁榮。隨著我們持續從新冠疫情帶來的經濟影響中逐步恢復,這一點尤為重要。
提案B是在不增稅的情況下對三藩市經濟未來的策略性投資,提供必要的工具來支持商業成長、吸引旅客,並提高居民和旅客的整體生活品質。
三藩市總商會
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
9
贊成提案B的付費論據
投票贊成提案B,以支持我們的LGBTQ+社區和所有三藩市人的健康、安全和活力。
提案B是對本市LGBTQ+社區的投資。以下是本提案為什麼重要的原因:
市立診所為我們的許多年輕人和低收入居民提供性病預防和治療,它將在提案B之下搬遷並擴建。新設施將加強服務,提供更快的化驗結果,並為每個人創造更具包容性的環境。透過提案B,我們可以保證在未來提供這些服務。
此外,Harvey Milk廣場將被改造成一個更安全、更有活力的空間,以銘記歷史並成為重要的聚會場所。這項翻新不僅是為了美觀,而是為了營造一個讓每個人都感到賓至如歸和安全的空間。
提案B也會增加無家可歸家庭的庇護所和住房容量,確保我們最弱勢的居民有一個安全的棲身之地。作為一座庇護之城,尤其是對性小眾青年而言,這符合本市同情和包容的價值觀。
提案B不僅是一項基礎設施投資,而是建設一個讓所有人都有機會享受健康、安全和充實生活的城市。
贊成提案B
Alice B. Toklas LGBTQ民主黨俱樂部
Harvey Milk LGBTQ民主黨俱樂部
州參議員Scott Wiener
Bevan Dufty,灣區捷運董事
市議員Matt Dorsey
市議員Joel Engardio
市議員Rafael Mandelman
Honey Mahogany,三藩市民主黨榮譽議長
Debra Walker,藝術家
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
10
贊成提案B的付費論據
提案B對於在不增稅的情況下保護和改善我們的公共衛生和安全基礎設施至關重要。
提案B為我們的公共衛生基礎設施投資2.05億美元,這些投資不僅能挽救生命,還能確保每位居民都能獲得最好的醫療保健服務。提案B資助以下重要的升級:
Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院,確保該醫院持續作為一家能夠處理緊急情況並提供頂級護理的最先進醫院。
Laguna Honda醫院是全美最大的公立專業護理設施,將進行急需的翻新,以達到聯邦和州的標準。
將Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院精神科緊急服務的容量提高一倍,增加精神保健服務的使用需求。
重新設計高風險十字路口,重鋪路面,改善公共空間。這意味著為行人、自行車騎士和駕駛人提供更安全的街道,減少意外事故,使本市更加暢通無阻。
提案B將在不增稅的情況下創造數以千計的就業機會,刺激本地經濟。市中心和聯合廣場的振興、公共空間的改善以及街道的安全將吸引更多的旅客,促進旅遊業的發展,這對我們在新冠疫情之後的經濟復甦至關重要。
提案B還將確保我們的設施符合現代環保標準。例如,華埠公共衛生局的翻新工程將使它成為三藩市醫療網絡中的第一座全電動建築,開創全市永續發展的先例。
投票贊成提案B,支持在不增稅的情況下,為所有人打造一個更健康、更安全、更有活力的三藩市!
州參議員Scott Wiener
加州審計長Malia Cohen
三藩市估值官Joaquín Torres
地方檢察官Brooke Jenkins
Bevan Dufty,灣區捷運董事
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:健康蓬勃的三藩市,贊成提案B。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. 三藩市總醫院基金會,2. DeSilva Gates Construction,3. Joseph Grubb。
11
贊成提案B的付費論據
啟動公共空間,助長三藩市經濟振興
從壯觀喜慶的Powell Street長廊到鼓舞人心的Harvey Milk廣場,是時候向世界展示,三藩市正處於盛況循環並對重點建築和設施進行新的公共投資。我們可以對共享的公共空間和設施進行針對性的公共投資,以改善我們的身體、社會和社區健康狀況,將多元的族群團結在一起。
讓我們與三藩市同胞一起投票贊成提案A,傳達以下訊息:三藩市的未來一定更美好。
Jim Chappell,SPUR前總監*
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:Jim Chappell。
Paid Arguments Against Proposition B
1
反對提案B的付費論據
讓市政廳明白,在我們批准數億美元的更多政府開支之前,居民理應向市府問責,並瞭解市府取得哪些成果:投票反對提案B。
僅在過去十年中,選民就批准了超過50億美元的債券支出。但是本市的走向錯誤,我們看不到市政廳取得成果。
儘管花費龐大,無家可歸者問題已成為無法控制的危機,市立大學混亂不堪,學區衰落,交通專案交付延遲數年,超出預算數億美元,我們的基礎設施正在衰敗 — 與此同時,市府預算已增至每年近160億美元。
儘管三藩市的預算比大多數的州份都要多,但三藩市目前卻面臨了近8億美元的驚人預算赤字。現在絕非批准增加3.9億美元政府開支、犧牲納稅人利益的時候。
雖然提案B的支持者會告訴您提案B不會增稅,但他們不會告訴您,如果提案B未獲得通過,您的稅率實際上會減低。
是時候讓選民告訴市府,在我們批准數億美元的額外開支之前,我們應有權對市府問責、瞭解其成果,並確保財政負責。
一遇到問題就砸更多錢,在過去沒有奏效,現在也不會。
向市政廳傳達訊息。居民需要市府正常運作,並量入為出。
投票反對提案B。
三藩市公寓協會
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市公寓協會政治行動委員會。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1. West Coast Property Management & Maintenance Company,2. Geary Real Estate Inc.,3. SkylinePMG, Inc. 。
Legal Text
Ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the City and County of San Francisco on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, for the purpose of submitting to San Francisco voters a proposition to incur bonded indebtedness of not-to-exceed $390,000,000 to finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including: facilities to deliver primary healthcare services, emergency medical services, skilled nursing services, and services for persons experiencing mental health challenges or persons with substance use disorders; acquire, improve, and seismically upgrade critical medical care and mental health facilities and emergency shelter facilities; and improvements for certain transportation, pedestrian, and street safety related capital improvements, streetscape enhancements and other public space improvements, and related costs necessary or convenient for each of the foregoing purposes; authorizing landlords to pass-through 50% of the resulting property tax increase, if any, to residential tenants under Administrative Code Chapter 37; providing for the levy and collection of taxes to pay both principal and interest on such Bonds; incorporating review of Bond expenditures under the provisions of the Administrative Code by the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee; setting certain procedures and requirements for the election; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and finding that the proposed Bonds are in conformity with the General Plan, and with the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b).
NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font.
Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font.
Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font.
Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font.
Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font.
Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code
subsections or parts of tables.Do NOT delete this NOTE: area.
Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:
Section 1. Findings.
A. According to the City and County of San Francisco (“City”) Point-in-Time Count conducted in January 2022, there were 7,754 people estimated as experiencing homelessness in the City, 4,397 of whom were unsheltered, and over the course of an entire year, many more people experience homelessness.
B. The City, through its Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, currently offers temporary shelter to over 3,500 people per night through a variety of shelter programs including emergency shelter, navigation centers, cabins, safe parking, and transitional housing, but additional shelter beds are needed to meet the needs of unsheltered adults, young adults, and families.
C. The City administers local, state, and federal funded supportive housing to provide long-term affordable housing with on-site social services to people exiting chronic homelessness through a portfolio that includes Single Room Occupancy hotels, newly constructed units, scattered-site units and apartment buildings (“permanent supportive housing” or “PSH”), but the City does not have a sufficient supply of PSH units to meet the demand.
D. The City, through its Department of Public Health, provides healthcare services in a number of settings and through a number of different mechanisms including at existing facilities such as Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, Residential Care Facilities, community clinics, and through contracts with nonprofit service providers.
E. When there is insufficient capacity at any one level of care or facility, longer wait times for services have a detrimental effect on the ability of people to heal and become healthier.
F. Limited state and federal resources and the high cost of construction place a greater burden on local governments to contribute their own limited resources to produce more facilities or expand capacity at existing facilities to provide emergency medical services, preventive healthcare services, temporary shelter, and permanent supportive housing, but the City’s financial resources have not kept pace with demand.
G. The City is responsible for the state of good repair of more than 1,200 miles of streets, approximately 50,000 curb ramp locations, 371 street structures, and 9 plazas, which are heavily used and have longstanding deferred maintenance needs.
H. Streets, curb ramps, street structures, and plazas connect people to jobs, hospitals, shopping centers, and transit -- places that are vital to daily life -- and providing smooth and pothole-free streets and pedestrian rights-of-way is essential to reducing the costs of road-induced damage, preventing accidents for bicyclists and drivers, and creating safe passage for pedestrians.
I. City staff have identified projects to address public safety hazards and improve disabled access, and have identified street repaving, curb ramp, street structures, and plaza improvement programs to address public safety hazards, reduce the backlog of deferred maintenance, improve disabled access, and equitably improve the public right-of-way.
K. Due to the high office vacancy rates after the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant increase in retail vacancy and a significant decrease in sales tax revenue in the Union Square and downtown areas. This Bond will make capital improvements in and around the Union Square and downtown areas that are designed to improve the pedestrian experience as part of a complementary strategy to sustain and improve the downtown retail storefront economy.
L. Infrastructure investment is a known and tested jobs stimulus strategy with a strong multiplier effect, estimated at 5.93 jobs for every million dollars in construction spending according to the REMI Policy Insight model.
M. Since 2005, the City has engaged in regular, long-term capital planning to identify and advance shovel-ready projects that deliver improvements in line with adopted funding principles that prioritize legal and regulatory mandates, life safety and resilience, asset preservation and sustainability, programmatic and planned needs, and economic development.
N. City staff have identified needed capital improvements totaling $390,000,000 in projects and programs relating to acquiring or improving real property, including to improve and make permanent investments in temporary shelters and/or facilities that provide preventive healthcare, emergency medical care, and behavioral health services; invest in critical repairs, renovations, and seismic upgrades at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital; and transportation, pedestrian, and street safety improvements, streetscape enhancements and other public space improvements (as further described in Section 3 below, and herein collectively referred to as the “Project”).
O. The proposed Healthy, Safe, and Vibrant San Francisco Bond (“Bond” ) will provide a portion of the critical funding necessary to finance the costs of the Project in the most cost-effective manner possible.
P. The proposed Bond is recommended by the City’s 10-year capital plan, approved each odd-numbered year by the Mayor of the City and this Board of Supervisors of the City (“Board”).
Section 2. A special election is called and ordered to be held in the City on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the City a proposition to incur bonded indebtedness of the City for the Project:
“HEALTHY, SAFE, AND VIBRANT SAN FRANCISCO BOND. $390,000,000 to acquire, construct, or improve real property, including: temporary shelters, particularly for families; facilities that deliver healthcare services, including preventive care and behavioral health services, such as the Chinatown Public Health Center; critical repairs, renovations and seismic upgrades at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital; and pedestrian and street safety improvements, streetscape enhancements, and other public space improvements; and to pay related costs; with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.0069/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $31,000,000, all subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits; and authorizing landlords to pass-through to residential tenants in units subject to Administrative Code Chapter 37 (“Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance”) 50% of the increase, if any, in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of the repayment of such Bonds.”
The special election called and ordered to be held hereby shall be referred to in this ordinance as the “Bond Special Election.”
Section 3. PROPOSED PROGRAM. Contractors and City departments shall comply with all applicable City laws when awarding contracts or performing work funded with the proceeds of Bonds authorized by this measure, including these projects; provided, however, that no Contractor owned or controlled by a member of the Board of Supervisors that participates in the vote on submitting this measure to the voters shall be permitted to bid on any work funded with proceeds of the Bonds:
A. EXPANDING AND IMPROVING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS TO DELIVER PREVENTIVE PRIMARY CARE SERVICES, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, SEXUAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND OTHER ANCILLARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES. Up to $99,100,000 of Bbond proceeds will be allocated to acquire or improve real property, including but not limited to finance the construction, acquisition, development, improvement, expansion, and rehabilitation of community health centers, including up to $71,100,000 to seismically retrofit and renovate the Chinatown Public Health Center and up to $28,000,000 to acquire and improve real property for the relocation of the City Clinic.
B. CRITICAL REPAIRS AND RENOVATIONS AT ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER AND LAGUNA HONDA HOSPITAL. Up to $56,000,00066,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to make critical repairs and renovations to Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital, including the repair of mechanical systems, fire control systems, and other deferred maintenance needs as well as real property improvements to hospital infrastructure required to meet new regulatory requirements to ensure the hospitals remain operational and in regulatory compliance.
C. SEISMIC UPGRADES AT ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER TO ENSURE SAFETY. Up to $40,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to pay the costs of improvements at Building 3 at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center for seismic retrofits to provide 65,000 square feet of safe and secure working space.
D. STREET SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. Up to $68,900,000 63,900,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to pay the cost of certain street safety projects Citywide, including projects on the High Injury Network, and making investments to improve pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic safety by repairing, constructing, and improving transportation infrastructure and equipment, including traffic signal upgrades, constructing and redesigning streets and sidewalks, and certain multimodal streetscape projects.
E. MODERN AND ACCESSIBLE PUBLIC REALM PROJECTS. Up to $46,000,000 41,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will used to improve and modernize public spaces in the downtown San Francisco areas, which could include areas near Powell and Market Streets, including accessibility improvements, and transit access and pedestrian experience enhancements; up to $25,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to improve accessibility, safety, and design at the Harvey Milk Plaza; and up to $5,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to rehabilitate and modernize park infrastructure and improve active recreational spaces.
F. NEW SHELTER SITES. Up to $50,000,000 of Bbond proceeds will be used to pay the costs to acquire, construct, finance, or improve shelter or interim housing sites to reduce unsheltered homelessness, particularly for families.
G. CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. A portion of Bond proceeds shall be used to perform audits of Bond expenditures implied by or necessarily incident to the acquisition or improvement of real property for the Project, as further described in Section 4 and Section 16 herein.
Section 4. BOND ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES.
The Bonds shall include the following administrative rules and principles:
A. OVERSIGHT. The proposed Bond funds shall be subject to approval processes and rules described in the San Francisco Charter and Administrative Code. Funds from this measure shall be committed to those potential programs and projects set for in Section 3, to the extent authorized by law and subject to any required environmental review. Pursuant to Administrative Code Section 5.31, the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee shall conduct an annual, independent performance and financial audit review of Bond spending, to ensure that the Bond expenditures have been spent to serve taxpayers of the City in accordance with the objects and purposes of this Ordinance, and shall provide an annual report of the Bond program to the Mayor and the Board. The audits shall be posted in a manner that is easily accessible to the public as provided in subsection B below. The Citizen’s General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee shall receive educational training about bonds and fiscal oversight.
To the extent required by law, the Citizens’ General Bond Oversight Committee shall provide copies of such audit reports to the California State Auditor for its review.
B. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. The City shall create and maintain a web page outlining and describing the Bbond program, progress, and activity updates, and shall make copies of any financial or performance audits available and reasonably accessible to members of the public. Each of the City’s Capital Planning Committee and the Citizens’ General Obligation Oversight Committee shall also hold an annual public hearing and review on the Bbond program and its implementation.
C. The Controller shall certify that the City has evaluated alternative funding sources for the projects authorized by this Ordinance. The certification regarding the evaluation of alternative funding sources shall be placed on file with the Clerk of the Board, in File No. 240497.
D. Proceeds of the sale of Bonds herein authorized shall be used only for the purposes specified in this Ordinance, and not for any other purpose, including the payment of salaries and other operating expenses of the City. The administrative costs of the City incurred to execute the projects authorized by this Ordinance shall not exceed 5% of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds.
E. To the extent required by any new law, the City will appoint a citizens’ oversight committee to ensure that Bond proceeds are expended only for the purposes described in this Ordinance. Such oversight committee shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual independent performance audit to ensure that Bond funds have been expended pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance. In addition, the oversight committee shall conduct or cause to be conducted an annual independent financial audit of the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds until all of those proceeds have been expended on the purposes provided in this Ordinance. The audits shall be posted in a manner that is easily accessible to the public. The oversight committee shall provide copies of such audit reports to the California State Auditor for its review.
Members appointed to such oversight committee shall receive educational training about bonds and fiscal oversight.To the extent permitted by law, the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee operating under Administrative Code Section 5.31 shall assume the responsibilities of any required oversight committee.
Section 5. The estimated cost of the bond-financed portion of the project described in Section 2 above was fixed by the Board by the following resolution and in the amount specified below:
Resolution No. , on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No.
240498 $390,000,000.
Such resolution was passed by two-thirds or more of the Board and approved by the Mayor. In such resolution it was recited and found by the Board that the sum of money specified is too great to be paid out of the ordinary annual income and revenue of the City in addition to the other annual expenses or other funds derived from taxes levied for those purposes and will require expenditures greater than the amount allowed by the annual tax levy.
The method and manner of payment of the estimated costs described in this ordinance are by the issuance of Bonds by the City not exceeding the principal amount specified.
Such estimate of costs as set forth in such resolution is adopted and determined to be the estimated cost of such bond-financed improvements and financing, respectively.
Section 6. The Bond Special Election shall be held and conducted and the votes received and canvassed, and the returns made and the results ascertained, determined, and declared as provided in this ordinance and in all particulars not recited in this ordinance such election shall be held according to the laws of the State of California (“State”) and the Charter of the City (“Charter”) and any regulations adopted under State law or the Charter, providing for and governing elections in the City, and the polls for such election shall be and remain open during the time required by such laws and regulations.
Section 7. The Bond Special Election is consolidated with the General Election scheduled to be held in the City on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 (“General Election”). The voting precincts, polling places, and officers of election for the General Election are hereby adopted, established, designated, and named, respectively, as the voting precincts, polling places, and officers of election for the Bond Special Election called, and reference is made to the notice of election setting forth the voting precincts, polling places, and officers of election for the General Election by the Director of Elections to be published in the official newspaper of the City on the date required under the laws of the State.
Section 8. The ballots to be used at the Bond Special Election shall be the ballots to be used at the General Election. The word limit for ballot propositions imposed by Municipal Elections Code Section 510 is waived. On the ballots to be used at the Bond Special Election, in addition to any other matter required by law to be printed thereon, shall appear the following as a separate proposition:
“HEALTHY, SAFE, AND VIBRANT SAN FRANCISCO BOND. To finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including: temporary shelters, particularly for families; facilities that deliver healthcare services, including preventive care and behavioral health services, such as the Chinatown Public Health Center; critical repairs, renovations, and seismic upgrades at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital; and pedestrian and street safety improvements, streetscape enhancements, and other public space improvements; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $390,000,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.0069/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $31,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?”
The City's current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.
Each voter to vote in favor of the foregoing bond proposition shall mark the ballot in the location corresponding to a "YES" vote for the proposition, and to vote against the proposition shall mark the ballot in the location corresponding to a "NO" vote for the proposition.
Section 9. If at the Bond Special Election it shall appear that two-thirds of all the voters voting on the proposition voted in favor of and authorized the incurring of bonded indebtedness for the purposes set forth in such proposition, then such proposition shall have been accepted by the electors, and the Bonds authorized shall be issued upon the order of the Board. Such Bonds shall bear interest at a rate not exceeding that permitted by law.
The votes cast for and against the proposition shall be counted separately and when two-thirds of the qualified electors, voting on the proposition, vote in favor, the proposition shall be deemed adopted.
Section 10. The actual expenditure of Bond proceeds provided for in this ordinance shall be net of financing costs.
Section 11. For the purpose of paying the principal and interest on the Bonds, the Board shall, at the time of fixing the general tax levy and in the manner for such general tax levy provided, levy and collect annually each year until such Bonds are paid, or until there is a sum in the Treasury of the City, or other account held on behalf of the Treasurer of the City, set apart for that purpose to meet all sums coming due for the principal and interest on the Bonds, a tax sufficient to pay the annual interest on such Bonds as the same becomes due and also such part of the principal thereof as shall become due before the proceeds of a tax levied at the time for making the next general tax levy can be made available for the payment of such principal.
Section 12. This ordinance shall be published in accordance with any State law requirements, and such publication shall constitute notice of the Bond Special Election and no other notice of the Bond Special Election hereby called need be given.
Section 13. The Board, having reviewed the proposed legislation, makes the following findings in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), California Public Resources Code, Sections 21000 et seq., the CEQA Guidelines, Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq. ("CEQA Guidelines"), and San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 31. The Board finds, affirms, and declares:
A. EXPANDING AND IMPROVING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS TO DELIVER PREVENTIVE PRIMARY CARE SERVICES, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES, SEXUAL HEALTH SERVICES, AND OTHER ANCILLARY HEALTHCARE SERVICES:
(i) The proposed funding for the Chinatown Public Health Center project was determined by the Planning Department to be exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 exemption for existing facilities pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, as set forth in the Planning Department’s memorandum dated May 6, 2024 , which determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 240497 (“Planning Department Memorandum”) and is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
(ii) The remaining portion of the proposed funding described in Section 3A of this ordinance is not an activity subject to CEQA because it would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and is not a "project" as defined under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4), as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
B. CRITICAL REPAIRS AND RENOVATIONS AT ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER AND LAGUNA HONDA HOSPITAL: The proposed funding for critical repairs and renovations at Zuckerberg General Hospital and Trauma Center and Laguna Honda Hospital is not an activity subject to CEQA because it would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and is not a "project" as defined under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4), as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
C. SEISMIC UPGRADES AT ZUCKERBERG SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL AND TRAUMA CENTER TO ENSURE SAFETY: The proposed funding for seismic upgrades at Zuckerberg General Hospital and Trauma Center Building 3 was determined by the Planning Department to be not a "project" as defined under CEQA Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378, as it is not an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and the scope of the project is consistent with San Francisco Planning’s “Processing Guidance: Not a Project Under CEQA” memorandum dated September 18, 2013, as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
E. MODERN AND ACCESSIBLE PUBLIC REALM PROJECTS:
(i) HARVEY MILK PLAZA: The proposed funding for Harvey Milk Plaza has been determined to be exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 exemption for replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
(ii) The remaining portion of the proposed funding described in Section 3E of this ordinance is not an activity subject to CEQA because it would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to CEQA Section 21065 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and is not a "project" as defined under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4), as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
G. CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE: The proposed role of the Citizens’ Oversight Committee is not an activity subject to CEQA because it would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) and is not a "project" as defined under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), as set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum, which determination is hereby affirmed and adopted by this Board for the reasons set forth in the Planning Department Memorandum.
H. Based on the whole record before the Board, there are no substantial project changes, no substantial changes in project circumstances, and no new information of substantial importance that would change the conclusions set forth in the exemption determinations by the Planning Department that, as described above, the proposed projects are exempt from environmental review.
I. For the portion of the proposed funding that does not constitute a project pursuant to CEQA, the use of bond proceeds to finance any specific project or portion of any specific project will be subject to approval of the applicable decision-making body at that time, upon completion of planning and any further required environmental review under CEQA.
Section 14. The Board finds and declares that the proposed Bonds (a) were referred to the Planning Department in accordance with Section 4.105 of the San Francisco Charter and Section 2A.53(f) of the Administrative Code, (b) are in conformity with the priority policies of Section 101.1(b) of the San Francisco Planning Code, and (c) are consistent with the City’s General Plan, and adopts the findings of the Planning Department, as set forth in the General Plan Referral Report dated May 6, 2024, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No. 240497 and incorporates such findings by this reference.
Section 15. Under Section 53410 of the California Government Code, the Bonds shall be for the specific purposes authorized in this ordinance and the proceeds of such Bonds will be applied only for such specific purposes. The City will comply with the requirements of Sections 53410(c) and 53410(d) of the California Government Code.
Section 16. CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. The Bonds are subject to, and incorporate by reference, the applicable provisions of Administrative Code Sections 5.30-5.36 ("Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee"). Under Administrative Code Section 5.31, to the extent permitted by law, 0.1% of the gross proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a fund established by the Controller’s Office and appropriated by the Board of Supervisors at the direction of the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to cover the costs of such committee.
Section 17. The time requirements specified in Administrative Code Section 2.34 are waived.
Section 18. The City hereby declares its official intent to reimburse prior expenditures of the City incurred or expected to be incurred prior to the issuance and sale of any series of the Bonds in connection with the Project. The Board hereby declares the City’s intent to reimburse the City with the proceeds of the Bonds for expenditures with respect to the Project (the “Expenditures” and each, an “Expenditure”) made on and after that date that is no more than 60 days prior to the passage of this Ordinance. The City reasonably expects on the date hereof that it will reimburse the Expenditures with the proceeds of the Bonds.
Each Expenditure was and will be either (a) of a type properly chargeable to a capital account under general federal income tax principles (determined in each case as of the date of the Expenditure), (b) a cost of issuance with respect to the Bonds, or (c) a nonrecurring item that is not customarily payable from current revenues. The maximum aggregate principal amount of the Bonds expected to be issued for the Project is $390,000,000. The City shall make a reimbursement allocation, which is a written allocation by the City that evidences the City’s use of proceeds of the applicable series of Bonds to reimburse an Expenditure, no later than 18 months after the later of the date on which the Expenditure is paid or the related portion of the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three years after the date on which the Expenditure is paid. The City recognizes that exceptions are available for certain “preliminary expenditures,” costs of issuance, certain de minimis amounts, expenditures by “small issuers” (based on the year of issuance and not the year of expenditure) and Expenditures for construction projects of at least five years.
Section 19. Landlords may pass through to residential tenants under the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Administrative Code Chapter 37) 50% of any property tax increase, if any, that may result from the issuance of Bonds authorized by this ordinance. The City may enact ordinances authorizing tenants to seek waivers from the pass-through based on financial hardship.
Section 20. The appropriate officers, employees, representatives, and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do everything necessary or desirable to accomplish the calling and holding of the Bond Special Election, and to otherwise carry out the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 21. Documents referenced in this ordinance are on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 240497, which is hereby declared to be a part of this ordinance as if set forth fully herein.