護士和911接線員的退休福利
市府是否應修改市憲章,允許身為三藩市僱員退休系統成員並且符合特定要求的註冊護士,為其之前擔任按日計薪護士的工作時間購買積分,以計入退休金總服務年限;並允許911調度員、主管和協調員透過加入三藩市僱員退休系統雜項安全計劃,為從2025年1月開始的工作時間增加退休金福利?
本提案需要有50%+1的贊成票才能獲得通過。
摘要由選票簡釋委員會撰寫
現況:
市府透過三藩市僱員退休系統(SFERS)為其僱員提供退休金福利。
SFERS根據僱員的最終薪酬、服務年資和退休年齡進行計算,確定退休人員在個別計劃下可領取的退休金。不同計劃的算法各有不同。
SFERS根據工作類型為僱員提供不同的計劃,包括:
• 雜項計劃,適用於911調度員及其主管和協調員,以及大多數其他市府僱員;
• 安全計劃,適用於警察局和消防局的制服僱員;以及
• 雜項安全計劃,適用於某些緩刑官、地方檢察官調查員和少年法庭輔導員。
一般來說,退休人員在安全計劃和雜項安全計劃下領取的退休金福利多於雜項計劃。儘管911調度員在加州被歸類為緊急應變人員,但是他們不是領取安全級別的退休金。
市府僱員按工資的一定比例繳納其退休金。在某些情況下,僱員也可以購買服務積分來增加他們的退休金福利。
「按日計薪護士」是指偶爾和臨時受僱於市政府的註冊護士。自1988年以來,按日計薪護士一直不是SFERS的成員,而且按日計薪的工作時數也不獲取任何退休金服務積分。
建議:
提案I 將允許合格的註冊護士為他們按日計薪的工作時間購買服務積分。剛加入或已加入SFERS的註冊護士,如果每週平均工作32小時或以上且至少工作一年者,可為其在加入SFERS之前僅作為按日計薪護士為市府工作的時間購買最多三年的服務積分。
提案I 也會將911調度員、主管和協調員在2025年1月4日及之後賺取的報酬從雜項計劃轉到雜項安全計劃。作為雜項安全計劃的成員,這些員工需要向退休金計劃增加繳納金額,並在退休時領取更多的退休金福利。
投「贊成」票的意思是:如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您同意允許身為三藩市僱員退休系統並且符合特定要求的註冊護士為其之前擔任按日計薪護士的工作時間購買積分,以計入退休金總服務年限;並允許911調度員、主管和協調員透過加入三藩市僱員退休系統雜項安全計劃,為從2025年1月開始的工作時間增加退休金福利。
投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您不同意做這些修改。
市主計官對提案「I」的意見書
市主計官Greg Wagner就提案I 對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明:
我認為,如果建議的憲章修正案獲得選民批准,它將對政府成本產生重大的影響。根據退休系統目前的精算假設和政策,修正案將導致市府第一年的費用增加約380萬美元至約670萬美元不等,而且每年的費用會隨著時間而增加。
按日計薪護士的退休系統積分
建議的憲章修正案將允許在SFERS合格工作分類中的註冊護士為其擔任按日計薪護士的時間購買最多三年的退休服務積分。目前,擔任按日計薪護士的時間沒有資格獲取退休服務積分。截至2023年7月1日,有1,400名為市府工作的註冊護士將有資格買回按日計薪服務積分。買回這些服務年限的費用將由僱員個人支付。修正案不允許以擔任按日計薪護士的工作時間作為提前加入SFERS的日期。
估計每年增加的市府退休費用將取決於買回先前服務積分的人數,每年增加的市府退休供款約為150萬美元至約440萬美元不等。
公共安全通訊人員
建議的憲章修正案將把911調度員(包括主管和協調員)從雜項退休計劃轉到雜項安全退休計劃。修正案將要求把911調度員在2025年1月4日之後的工作時間計入其雜項安全退休計劃。
從2025–26財政年度開始,估計市府每年需支付約230萬美元,用於增加退休供款,並隨著受影響的工資金額而逐年增加。約有175名911調度員(包括主管和協調員)為市府工作。
如果建議修正案鼓勵現有的911調度員延長工作年限,市府也許可以延遲或減少新911調度員的入職費用,但是目前無法預測的一個比率。訓練和入職一名新的911調度員大約需要22.5萬至23.5萬美元的費用。
提案「I」如何被列入選票
2024年7月23日,市議會以11票對0票通過將提案I 列入選票。市議會的投票如下:
贊成:Chan、Dorsey、Engardio、Mandelman、Melgar、Peskin、Preston、Ronen、Safai、Stefani、Walton。
反對:無。
以上陳述是本提案的中立分析。贊成和反對本提案的論據在本文後刊登。所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition I
三藩市面臨9-1-1調度員和註冊護士的嚴重短缺。
提案I 將改善這些重要緊急應變人員的招聘和留任,減低因僱用不足和過度超時工作對納稅人造成的負擔。
提案I 是填補9-1-1人員不足的關鍵。
三藩市9-1-1調度系統的僱員短缺了20%。調度員每班工作15-18小時,這是難以為繼的。他們已經筋疲力盡,臨近崩潰邊緣。
為了公平地對待調度員,使他們能留在其位,並吸引最優質的新調度員,我們需要為他們提供與其他公共安全僱員相同的退休福利。
調度員雖被歸類為緊急應變人員,但卻並未享有同樣的安全計劃退休福利。這種情況必須改變。提案I 會改變這種情況。
提案I 是填補護士短缺的關鍵。
我們的註冊護士情況也好不到哪裡。三藩市僱用了數千名註冊護士作為公務員,但是仍有數百個職位空缺。註冊護士疲憊不堪,離開市府前往私立醫院。
為了儘快獲得護士投入工作,市府透過公司承包商僱用臨時的旅行護士,納稅人為此而多支付了14%的金額。然而,護士是市府唯一不准許在成為長期僱員後買回退休金時間的僱員。
提案I 修補了這個漏洞,讓臨時註冊護士有機會加入全職護士的行列,並可根據其工作時間領取退休金的可能,為納稅人節省14%。
提案I 是三藩市預算、納稅人和安全的三贏方案。
提案I 為三藩市的緊急調度員和護士提供應得的福利,以至我們可以挽留盡忠職守的公共安全專業人員,吸引新的人才,改善本市的緊急服務。
加入911調度員、護士、服務業僱員國際聯盟第1021號地方分會和公共安全倡導者,投票贊成提案I。
市議員Ahsha Safai
市議員Myrna Melgar
市議員Dean Preston
市議員Shamann Walton
市議員Connie Chan
市議員Matt Dorsey
市議員Aaron Peskin
市議員Catherine Stefani
市議員Rafael Mandelman
市議員Joel Engardio
服務業僱員國際聯盟第1021號地方分會
Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition I
三藩市政府今年的預算赤字高達7.9億美元,這是該勒緊腰帶的時候,而不是增加開支。
但是三藩市市議會的議員非但沒有採取負責任的行動,反而是在選票上塞滿了提案,引述《三藩市紀事報》編輯部的話:「像啪啪糖一樣派發新的數百萬美元退休金福利。」
市議員Asha Safaí的提案I 就是其中之一。對於一個正在競選市長的人來說,屈服於強大的僱員工會的要求並不是一個好形像。
三藩市有一個臃腫的市政府,共有60個部門和34,000多名員工。即便如此,這樣說已是可能講低了地方政府的真實規模,因為根據最近的民事大陪審團報告,政府還與600多家
非營利組織訂有合約。
如果說市府部門無法吸引足夠的註冊護士或911調度員,那麼一部分的問題可能是已經有太多的潛在僱員為政府從事其他較少必要的工作?
政府不能繼續支付僱員更多的薪金,同時持續增加員工人數。對城市的其他納稅人(包括居民和企業)的負擔會不斷加重,越來越無法持續。
是時候停止這種瘋狂了。
投票反對提案I。
Starchild
三藩市自由黨
LPSF.org
Opponent's Argument Against Proposition I
在今年11月攤在我們面前的眾多選票提案中,有一些提案深入了公務員退休金系統的秘密世界。這只能歸咎於政府的貪婪。
提案I 提議修改憲章,擴大自疫情以來因全國「緊急應變人員」短缺而受到影響的兩類公職人員的退休金福利:註冊護士和負責911緊急線路的公共安全通訊人員。
提案將允許本市的「按日計薪」註冊護士,即是那些目前或過去選擇以臨時勞工(無退休金福利)身份彈性工作的人,成為市府的全職護士(有退休金福利)。提案也讓他們有權利追溯購買(一個獲利方式)最多三年「按日計薪」工作時間的退休金福利。由於不確定有多少護士會行使這種權利,因此主計官估計購買過去三年服務積分權利的成本為150萬美元至440萬美元不等。但是目前一個熱門網站指出三藩市註冊護士的年薪中位數為147,104美元(比全國平均水平高出85%,這筆高工資歸因於高昂的生活成本和強大的工會)。
提案I 也將本市911緊急應變調度員的退休金計劃從目前的計劃改為加入消防員和警員的較高退休金計劃。提案聲稱這是為了應對目前調度員20-25%的空缺率以及高於疫情之前
的電話量。但是更好的訓練計劃目前已在進行。
提案的理據似乎是因為它們都是緊急服務,即使處理火災和槍枝所面臨的風險與接聽電話的風險不盡相同。避免「緊急應變人員」的恐慌煽動。單單說不。
三藩市自由黨
LPSF.org
Rebuttal to Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition I
提案I 是三藩市預算、納稅人和公共安全的三贏常識性解決方案。
提案I 為三藩市的9-1-1調度員和護士提供應得的退休金福利,以至我們可以挽留盡忠職守的公共安全專業人員,並吸引新的人材,改善我們城市的緊急服務。
我們城市的公立醫院的註冊護士位於三藩市健康危機的最前線。他們熱愛自己的工作。但是,市府繁瑣的招聘流程拖延了按日計薪的臨時護士被聘為全職註冊護士的時間,加劇了人手短缺的危機。我們每年都流失訓練有素的護士到私立醫院,因為私立醫院提供更高的薪酬、更好的福利和更多的支持。
這就是為何我們需要提案I。
提案I 允許臨時護士為他們替市府工作的時間購買最多三年的退休服務積分,填補護士的職位空缺,吸引並挽留為Zuckerberg三藩市總醫院和其他市立醫院的患者提供頂級護
理的專業人員。
提案I 終於對911調度員的服務表示敬意,確保他們獲得與其他公共安全專業人員相同、改善的安全級別退休福利。這是一個合乎常理的解決方案,可以吸引我們所需的勞動力,
改善我們的9-1-1緊急應變。
我們虧欠了我們的護士、9-1-1調度員和所有三藩市人,我們有責任通過提案I,以便修復公共安全人員短缺的問題,及使我們的城市更安全。
投票贊成提案I。
市議員Ahsha Safai
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition I
1
贊成提案I的付費論據
三藩市公共衛生局工作的註冊護士在本市面臨的每一場危機都處於最前線。
作為唯一的一級創傷中心,我們不拒絕任何人。暴力、性侵犯、心臟驟停、中風以及行人與汽車/滑板車頻繁事故的患者每天24小時都會來到這裡。我們也為本市最弱勢的人群提供醫療保健、心理健康服務和戒毒治療。Laguna Honda醫院是全國最大的醫療照護設施,在最近由於員工的奉獻而免於關閉。
儘管如此,我們仍難以招聘和留任優秀的護士。市府殘缺不全的招聘流程導致聘用一名長期護士識位的時間拖延了幾百天。尋求全職職位的護士被拒之門外,只能從事臨時性的按日計薪工作,沒有任何福利、退休金或帶薪休假。當護士最終獲得長期職位時,將會失去按日計薪服務的退休積分。
提案I將允許長期護士為自己的按日計薪期間的服務買回最多三年的退休金積分,激勵他們留任,並鼓勵從一開始就進行適當的聘用。
更重要的是,這項修正案將糾正一種不公平現象。護士(其中大多數是女性)是本市唯一不能買回退休金時間的工作者類別。透過擴大這一權利,修正案鼓勵對三藩市公立醫院和診所的長期承諾。
三藩市的安全網護士請求您投票贊成提案I。
Heather Bollinger,註冊護士
SEIU工會1021分會註冊護士分會主席
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:改善應急回應時間,贊成提案I。
Paid Arguments Against Proposition I
無人提交反對提案I的付費論據
Legal Text
Describing and setting forth a proposal to the voters at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to allow registered nurses, who are or become members of the San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System and have worked an average of 32 hours or more per week for at least one year, to purchase up to three years of service credit for time previously worked as per diem nurses; and to move public safety communications personnel (911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators) from the miscellaneous retirement plans to the miscellaneous safety retirement plan, for compensation earned on and after January 4, 2025.
Section 1. Findings.
(a) Per Diem Nurse Retirement Credit Purchases.
(1) According to the United States Registered Nurse Workforce Report Card and Shortage Forecast, a national shortage of registered nurses (RNs) is projected to exist through 2030, with the most intense shortage in the Western region of the United States. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, are projecting that many regions of California – including San Francisco – will face a shortage of RNs through 2035, due to the number of RNs expected to retire or enter advanced practices, as well as the burnout, stress, exhaustion, and frustration among nurses in the post-pandemic era.
(3) A San Francisco Chronicle article dated April 23, 2024, noted that the nursing shortage is already being felt in our public health system, and ZSFG nursing staff believe the shortage is at a “crisis level.” A San Francisco Department of Public Health (“DPH”) survey found that 73% of the hospital’s workforce would not recommend ZSFG as a place to receive care. The same survey found that the percentage of hospital employees who would recommend working at ZSFG dropped from 63% of respondents in 2019 to 32% in 2023.
(6) As of March 2024, San Francisco had an estimated 169 fully funded RN positions that were vacant. By allowing new and existing nurses to purchase up to three years of retirement service credit for time they spent working as per diem nurses for the City, San Francisco will be better equipped to compete with the private sector – the number one competitor for nursing talent – to fill our nursing positions, and to attract and retain these dedicated healthcare professionals who provide top-quality care for patients at ZSFG and elsewhere in the City’s healthcare system.
(b) Retirement Plan for Public Safety Communications Personnel.
(1) Public Safety Communications Personnel, which include 911 dispatchers, supervisors, and coordinators, work with the public and other first responders to protect the lives of residents of and visitors to San Francisco. Although they are a critical component of our emergency response system, the City’s public safety communications personnel teams have been chronically understaffed for years, negatively affecting emergency response times.
(4) In 2020, California Assembly Bill 1945, codified at Government Code Sec. 8562, included emergency dispatchers among the list of first responders for whom the state must develop emergency preparedness training materials. Yet, 911 operators statewide do not receive the same retirement benefits as other first responders.
(5) This Charter amendment reclassifies Public Safety Communications Personnel as members in the Miscellaneous Safety Plan rather than members in the Miscellaneous Plans in SFERS, both to recognize the vital importance of their work and to make the position more attractive for qualified job seekers. This change will help DEM fill its vacant positions more quickly, and retain its employees for longer periods of time, which will reduce call response times and improve emergency service for all of San Francisco’s residents, workers, and visitors.
Section 2. The Board of Supervisors hereby submits to the qualified voters of the City and County, at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, a proposal to amend the Charter of the City and County by adding new Sections A8.524 and A8.611, to read as follows:
NOTE: Unchanged Charter text is in plain font.
Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman font.
Deletions are strike-through italics Times New Roman font.
Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Charter subsections.
A8.524 RETIREMENT SYSTEM CREDIT FOR PER DIEM NURSE SERVICE
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter, any member of the Retirement System under Sections A8.509, A8.587, A8.600, A8.603, or any subsequently approved miscellaneous plan, who is employed in a registered nurse classification that qualifies them for membership in the Retirement System may purchase up to three years aggregated retirement service credit for time worked in a P103 per diem appointment prior to becoming a member of the Retirement System, subject to the terms of this Section A8.524.
(b) A member shall be eligible to purchase retirement service credit as set forth in subsection (a), only if:
(1) the member is a registered nurse;
(2) the member has worked an average of not less than 32 regularly-scheduled hours per week for at least one calendar year in a registered nurse classification that qualifies them for membership in the Retirement System prior to electing to purchase service credit; and
(3) during the time in which the member worked in a P103 per diem appointment for which they seek to purchase credit, the member did not concurrently work in a nurse job classification that is within the Retirement System.
(c) Nothing in this Section A8.524 shall permit any time worked as a P103 per diem nurse to be used to establish membership in the Retirement System.
(d) The employing department shall certify to the Retirement System that a member is eligible to purchase retirement service credit pursuant to eligibility criteria set forth in this Charter Section A8.524. A member electing to purchase service credit with the Retirement System for a period of qualifying per diem appointment must so elect in writing on a form provided by the Retirement System. This election must be made and payment received before the effective date of retirement.
(e) The cost to purchase this prior service credit shall be based on the contribution rate percentage in effect at the time the service was rendered. Service credit will be allowed only for such contributions plus interest received by the Retirement System from the member prior to the effective date of retirement. A member cannot receive more than 80 hours of service credit in a pay period and cannot receive more than one year of service credit in a fiscal year, as a result of such prior service credit purchase.
(f) This Section A8.524 creates no vested right to the benefits received pursuant to this Section. The voters expressly reserve the right to alter, reduce, or repeal such benefits for any or no reason.
(g) This Section A8.524 shall not apply to Retirement System members who retired, died, or separated prior to the effective date of this Section, or to their successors in interest.
A8.611 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS PERSONNEL
(a) Effective January 4, 2025, Public Safety Communications Personnel shall be classified as miscellaneous safety plan employees. For purposes of this Section A8.611, “Public Safety Communications Personnel” means public safety communications dispatchers, public safety communications supervisors, and public safety communications coordinators.
(b) As of January 4, 2025, Public Safety Communications Personnel shall be subject to the provisions of Section A8.610 through A8.610-16, in addition to the provisions of this Section A8.611, regardless of their date of hire. For Public Safety Communications Personnel, computation of service under Section A8.610-10 shall be time during which a member is entitled to receive compensation in a Public Safety Communications Personnel job classification on and after January 4, 2025. Time during which a Public Safety Communications Personnel member was entitled to receive compensation before January 4, 2025 shall remain in the miscellaneous plan applicable to the member.
(c) Section A8.611 shall not apply to a Public Safety Communications Personnel member who separated from service, retired, or died before January 4, 2025, or to the member’s continuant.