為低收入長者、家庭和殘障人士的可負擔住房開發案提供租金補貼資金
市府是否應修改市憲章,要求市府每年撥款至少825萬美元,為極低收入的長者、家庭和殘障人士等住戶的可負擔住房開發案提供租金補貼?
本提案需要有50%+1的贊成票才能獲得通過。
摘要由選票簡釋委員會撰寫
現況:
州法律要求三藩市進行充分規劃,以滿足社區內不同收入水平的人的住房需求。在三藩市裡低收入家庭的收入不超過地區收入中位數(AMI)的80%,極低收入家庭(ELI)的收入不超過地區收入中位數的35%。
為滿足低收入家庭的需求,市府提供貸款以購置、建造或修復可負擔住房,但是這些貸款計劃並不能全額補貼這些住房單元的營運成本與極低收入家庭所能負擔的租金之間的差額。結果,只有少量的住房單元是會以極低收入家庭能夠負擔得起的租金提供出來。
數量有限的可負擔住房開發案為極低收入長者提供出租單元,並由市府提供租金補貼。市府直接向業主提供資金,去補貼極低收入長者的租金。
市府也為曾經歷無家可歸的家庭提供房租補貼。
這兩項補貼計劃的部分資金來自州政府或聯邦撥款,其他資金則根據年度預算流程從普通基金撥款支付。目前沒有永久性的資金來源或年度承諾來資助這些計劃,也沒有針對極低收入家庭或殘障人士的類似計劃。
「市長的住房及社區發展辦公室」(MOHCD)負責協調市府的可負擔住房政策,管理這些貸款和租金補貼計劃。
建議:
提案G是一項憲章修正案,它為長者、家庭和殘障人士設立一個可負擔住房機會基金(基金)。
根據提案G,市府每年必須向該基金撥款至少825萬美元:
- 自2026–27財政年度起,每年至少撥款825萬美元;及
- 直至2045–46財政年度,撥款至少是前一年的金額,並且根據市府的稅收情況上調最多3%。
如果市府在任何一年預計的預算赤字達到或超過2.5億美元,可以減少對基金的撥款,前提是,市府在2026–27財年至少撥款400萬美元,和以後每年至少撥款825萬美元。
根據提案G,「市長的住房及社區發展辦公室」負責管理基金,向三藩市某些新建和現有的可負擔住房開發案的業主發放資金,用於補貼收入不超過地區收入中位數35%的長者、家庭或殘障人士等極低收入家庭的租金。這些資金將用於補貼這些租戶能夠負擔的租金與業主本應收取的租金之間的差額。除非選民重新授權,否則該基金將於2046年12月31日終止。
投「贊成」票的意思是:如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您同意修改市憲章,每年撥款至少825萬美元,為極低收入的長者、家庭和殘障人士等住戶的可負擔住房開發案提供租金補貼。
投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您不同意市府做這些修改。
市主計官對提案「G」的意見書
市主計官Greg Wagner就提案G對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明:
我認為,如果建議的憲章修正案獲得選民批准,將對政府的成本產生重大影響,因為它將重新分配原本可被運用的資金,從2026–27財年至少400萬美元開始,到2027–28財年的825萬美元,並以每年不超過3%的額度遞增,到2045–46財年最高可達到約1,400萬美元。
建議的憲章修正案將設立長者、家庭和殘障人士的可負擔住房機會基金(基金),由「市長的住房及社區發展辦公室」(MOHCD)為極低收入(ELI)家庭提供租金補貼。除非選民批准延期,否則基金將於2046年12月31日到期。自2025年3月1日起,主計官將每年報告可從各種非普通基金來源撥給基金的金額。
修正案要求市府每年撥款,從2026–27財年的825萬美元開始。在隨後年份直到2045–46財政年度,市府需要撥付至少與前一年相同的金額,最多比前一年多3%。然而,如果市府預計預算赤字達2.5億美元或以上,則建議修正案將允許市府在該年將年度撥款減至400萬美元,並在隨後年份每年撥款825萬美元。在基金運作的20年期間,總費用將從1.61億美元到2.22億美元不等,取決於市府的財政健康狀況以及市長和市議會的預算決定。
本建議修正案不符合一項不具約束力、由選民通過有關預留款的市府政策。該政策旨在限制預留款,因為預留款會減少本可由市長和市議會在年度預算過程中分配的普通基金資金。在2023–24財年預算中,所有底線需求總額約為21億美元,佔約68億美元普通基金預算的30.7%。
注意,建議修正案將會改變預備本聲明的主計官辦公室的職責。
提案「G」如何被列入選票
2024年7月23日,市議會以11票對0票將提案G列入選票。市議會的投票如下:
贊成:Chan、Dorsey、Engardio、Mandelman、Melgar、Peskin、Preston、Ronen、Safai、Stefani、Walton。
反對:無。
以上陳述是本提案的中立分析。贊成和反對本提案的論據在本文後刊登。所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition G
三藩市致力擴大長者、家庭和殘障人士的住房機會,提案G有助我們實現這個目標。
提案G為使我們的城市向目標邁出了關鍵性的一步,它擴大所有收入水平的家庭獲得安全且可負擔住房的機會。三藩市在建設新住房和改造現有住房單元方面有所進展時,也要確保最低收入的長者、家庭和殘障人士有資格獲得這些住房,及不被拋在後面。這是現有聯邦和州的住房計劃無法充分滿足的需求。
在市議會和市長的一致支持下,提案G被列入選票,它會採取以下方法應對我們住房計劃的缺口:
- 承諾提供穩定、持續的資金,以提高本市可負擔住房的可負擔性
- 依靠現有資金來源,建造數百個可負擔住房單元
- 為最弱勢的三藩市人提供住房,避免他們變成無家可歸
- 建立一個公開流程去開發和監督此計劃
本基金將與新的和現有的住房計劃配合,以提高其成效,為極低收入家庭提供額外數百套的可負擔住房。
11月5日,讓我們邁出極為需要的這一步,建設更包容、更可能負擔的三藩市。加入我們投票贊成提案G!
市議會主席Aaron Peskin
市長London Breed
華協中心
Compass家庭服務中心
社區房屋委員會組織
信仰行動
米慎區房屋
安老自助處
Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition G
提案G的支持者聲稱它將「創造」住房。實際上,這是一場短視的賭博,將會進一步加劇三藩市的住房危機。
他們承諾將增加「數百套」住房單元,但卻忽視了提案G將助長全市房租上漲的風險。提案將普通基金用於房租補貼,此提案用納稅人的錢養活房東,鼓勵房租上漲。這不會使住房更容易負擔,事實上,對於沒有抽中一張名副其實的彩券的人來說,住房只會變得更昂貴。
現有的計劃容易出現欺詐和管理不善問題。我們為什麼不收緊標準?最近,三藩市一名商人承認從第8條補貼中竊取了超過34萬美元。提案G缺乏必要的防衛措施來防止濫用,它消耗了本該用於真正有需要人士的資源。
三藩市最近通過了一項重大住房債券,並為可負擔住房專案爭取到州和聯邦的1.17億美元的資金。與其採取提案G的高風險補貼,讓我們以現有、已獲得資金而且已經是從根源上解決問題的長期可負擔住房計劃為基礎上建設。
投票反對提案G。拒絕假像的進步,以納稅人的錢賭博,浪費能真正解決方案所需的資源。
Larry Marso, Esq.
Opponent's Argument Against Proposition G
提案G挪用市府普通基金來補貼房租,這是短期「修補」,它會帶來嚴重的長期後果。這項提案消耗了公共安全、基礎設施和教育等基本服務的關鍵資源。
三藩市的預算已經陷入了死亡漩渦。將普通基金用於可疑的補貼,進一步破壞本市財政的穩定,使其他被削減。
租金補貼缺乏有效的針對性。這項計劃是另一個名副其實的彩券 — 有贏家也有輸家。這項提案將使全市的房租上漲。房東獲得市政府普通基金的餵養,將推高房租。提案G使許多三藩市人更無法負擔住房。這是對我們住房系統根深蒂固弊病的又一次「熱止痛貼」,會燒傷無法取得資格的高危居民。
三藩市需要進行全面的住房改革,鼓勵建造更多可負擔住房,簡化許可程序,激勵私人投資。這些解決方案將帶來可持續的長期改善。
投票反對提案G,支持住房改革,從源頭上解決三藩市的可負擔性危機。
Larry Marso
Marso先生是技術高管、併購顧問和律師。他是一位堅定的財政責任倡導者,撰寫了規範三藩市無家者導航/收容中心的選票提案,打擊政黨和非營利組織中的腐敗和欺詐行為,並作為當地共和黨委員會的成員和前執行官,提出了有原則的反對意見。
停止對三藩市選民的大欺詐!瀏覽https://bigfraud.com
Larry S. Marso
Rebuttal to Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition G
投票贊成提案G受到三藩市各界的支持——醫療保健提供者、宗教領袖、社區服務組織、住房倡導者以及長者、婦女和租客倡導者——他們知道解決我們的住房危機所需的是甚麼。
提案G是解決方案的重要部分,將為最有需要的人擴充更多住房機會,同時不會削減其他基本服務。它將:
- 填補本市可負擔住房體系中的重要缺口,降低最低收入群組的租金
- 在不觸碰市府普通基金或影響基本服務的情況下,使用現有的住房基金,為計劃提供全面支持
- 針對固定收入的長者和殘障人士以及從事最低工資工作的家庭提供補貼
加入我們的團結聯盟,共同努力制定明智、負責任的解決方案,從源頭上面對三藩市的住房危機。投票贊成提案G,以創造更多安全且可負擔的住房!
Marie Jobling,尊嚴基金聯盟聯席主席
Sal Rosselli,全國醫療保健工作者工會名譽會長*
Bayview長者服務中心
Compass家庭服務中心
三藩市社區青少年中心
社區房屋委員會組織
信仰行動
米慎區房屋
三藩市租客聯盟
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition G
1
贊成提案G的付費論據
贊成提案G:讓所有人在未來都享有可負擔住房
我們共同建造並保留了數千套可負擔住房,並將繼續建造數千套。然而,如果沒有提案G,那些收入最低的人群 — 基要工作者、長者和殘障人士 — 仍然無法獲得這些關鍵資源。
贊成提案G是解決這種不平衡的重要步驟,對於我們繼續在最需要的地方提供住房解決方案至關重要。這項提案將會:
- 創造新的住房機會:提案G將為收入低於地區收入中位數(AMI)30% 的長者和家庭提供500多套新的可負擔住房,滿足本市對於真正可負擔住房的迫切需求。
- 將資源用於最有需要的人:確保未來的可負擔住房優先提供給最弱勢的人群,使我們的住房努力更加公平有效。
- 支持全市的住房保護:加強城市住房保護計劃,對於保持現有住房的可負擔性和防止流離失所至關重要。
三藩市正處於住房危機的關鍵時刻。讓我們為多元化社區的穩定未來投資,為最需要幫助的三藩市人投票贊成提案G。
社區房屋委員會組織
Bernal Heights鄰里中心
華協中心
Community Forward SF
慈愛之家
米慎區經濟發展局
米慎區房屋
三藩市社區土地信託
三藩市住房加速基金
三藩市房屋開發機構
田德隆區鄰里發展機構
婦女住房聯盟
青少年社區開發者
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
2
贊成提案G的付費論據
贊成提案G:三藩市的長者和家庭需要可負擔住房
過去十年來,雖然三藩市的收入中位數飆升,但是長者和工薪家庭的收入卻幾乎沒有變化。一位全職工作、領取最低工資的單親家長的年收入僅為37,600美元,不足以支付適合家庭居住的租金。同樣,在有長者或殘障人士的家庭中,超過56%的家庭租金負擔沉重,月收入中位數徘徊在1,500美元左右,僅為地區收入中位數的15%。他們沒有安全的居住條件,隨時面臨流離失所的威脅。
提案G將為這些弱勢群體提供數百個急需的可負擔住房機會。透過支持本提案,我們可以幫助照顧為本市做出巨大貢獻的長者,確保工薪家庭能夠負擔住房成本,並確保他們的子女能夠在他們建設的社區中茁壯成長。
11月5日,您的贊成提案G投票就是承諾一個更公平、更包容的三藩市。這是投票塑造一個城市,讓我們的孩子擁有未來,長者可以在穩定安全的環境中安享晚年。請幫助我們使三藩市成為一個充滿希望和機會的地方。投票贊成提案G!
Bayview長者服務
Coleman倡議者
三藩市社區青少年中心
尊嚴基金聯盟
三藩市民眾服務網絡
長者和殘障人士行動
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
3
贊成提案G的付費論據
贊成提案G:所有租戶都應獲得穩定、可負擔的住房
房租飆升對我們最弱勢的居民打擊最大,使得長者、家庭和殘障人士越來越難獲得穩定、可負擔的住房。很多時候,人們被迫在有住所和有飯吃之間做出選擇。
贊成提案G邁出了關鍵的一步,確保向最需要的人提供更多可負擔住房:
- 固定收入家庭:殘障租戶和長者最有可能因為無力支付房租而流離失所。這項提案可確保以他們能夠負擔的租金提供更多住房,有助於防止流離失所和無家可歸。
- 從事最低工資工作的家庭:儘管有全職工作,但是辛勤工作的家庭仍在努力尋找他們負擔得起的住房。這筆基金使他們能夠真正負擔房租,留在他們幫助建設的社區裡。
三藩市的住房負擔危機需要採取緊急行動。11月5日,投票贊成提案G,確保所有人都能獲得更多住房,擴大獲得可負擔住房的機會,以便確保我們社區的未來。
三藩市租客聯盟
可負擔住房聯盟
Bill Sorro房屋計劃
驅逐防禦合作組織
房屋權利委員會
北灘租客委員會
三藩市反流離失所聯盟
Market街南部社區行動網絡
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
4
贊成提案G的付費論據
可負擔住房是一項道德事業 — 讓我們一起支持提案G
作為宗教領袖,我們關心我們社區和本市的心靈福祉。我們知道,確保每個人都能獲得住房,對我們所有人的心靈健康至關重要。在我們的城市中,許多長者、殘障人士和低收入鄰居都在為生計而掙扎,勉強度日,卻找不到能夠負擔的住房。許多人露宿街頭、住在車裡或城市庇護所,經歷沉重的苦難和創傷。還有一些人與家人或朋友住在一起,或犧牲大部分收入來保持住房,勉強維持朝不保夕的狀態。這些是嚴重的不公正,不管是甚麼信仰的人都一定會反對。在我們摯愛的城市中,正義就是長者、殘障人士和家庭都能享有可以負擔的住房。我們都應該有一個可以稱之為家的地方。
John Kirkley牧師,聖詹姆斯聖公會教堂
Arnold Townsend牧師
Norman Fong牧師,唐人街長老教會堂區助理*
Me'irah lliinsky拉比,Or Shalom猶太社區*
Joel Balzer長老,恩典團契社區教會*
John Talbott長老,金巴崙長老會*
Samantha Gutierrez-Graczak,校園牧師,校園基督教團契*
Brenden Gutierrez-Graczak,校園牧師,校園基督教團契*
GLIDE基金會
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
5
贊成提案G的付費論據
贊成提案G:確保黑人社區的住房公平
三藩市黑人社區在本市最低收入居民中的比例過高,導致缺乏住房保障,及無家可歸的風險較高。由於缺乏真正可負擔的住房單元,社區中的許多人,包括長者、家庭和住房優惠證持有者,在獲得可負擔住房方面都面臨了巨大障礙。我們的社區已經太長時間面對這些住房挑戰了。
提案G將專門為本市最低收入居民的住房提供資金。提案G透過建設更多極可負擔的住房,直接解決系統性不公平問題,並為我們的社區創造進入可負擔住房系統所需的機會。
我們面臨一個選擇:是繼續忽視辛勤工作的家庭和固定收入長者的需求,還是採取果斷行動確保我們的住房體系公平且有包容性。
投票贊成提案G,確保黑人社區的每名成員在未來都能獲得安全、穩定、可負擔的住房。
青少年社區開發者
Bayview長者服務
Black to the Future
Without Walls CDC
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
6
贊成提案G的付費論據
亞裔和太平洋島民社區支持可負擔的長者和家庭住房,贊成提案G
我們的社區迫切需要更多可負擔住房 — 長者和工薪家庭真正負擔得起的住房。由於無法獲得可負擔住房,如今有太多的亞太裔長者和家庭被迫住在不安全、不符合標準的環境中。還有一些人因為負擔不起住房費用而離開這座城市。如果我們不能將長者和家庭留在三藩市,我們的社區和小企業都將蒙受損失。透過使用現有的資金來滿足這項重要需求,提案G將在不增加稅收的情況下創造更多住房機會。讓我們優先考慮長者和家庭的住房問題。請投票贊成提案G。
Anni Chung,安老自助處
Wing Hoo Leung,社區租客協會
Norman Yee,市議會前主席
Pratibha Tekkey,中心城區散房合作組織*
亞洲法律核心小組
華協中心
華人進步會
SOMA Pilipinas
田德隆華人權益協會
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
7
贊成提案G的付費論據
贊成提案G:為拉丁裔社區提供極可負擔的住房
我們的拉丁裔社區正面臨嚴峻的住房挑戰,包括過度擁擠和流離失所。我們需要一個能從根本上解決問題的方案,為收入最低的鄰居提供安全、穩定和真正可以負擔的住房。Unidos podemos pasar la Propuesta G,投票贊成提案G!
提案G對我們的社區至關重要,因為它將:
- 支持我們的家庭:創造極可負擔住房機會,防止擁擠,及提供健康的生活條件,和改善學生的學習成績。
- 照顧我們的的長者:確保住房的穩定性和可負擔性,尊重我們辛勤工作的長者,防止他們在晚年離開本市。
- 扭轉拉丁裔無家可歸人數激增的趨勢:無家可歸的拉丁裔人數增加了55% ,極需我們提供一個具有成本效益的針對性解決方案,為鄰居提供穩定的住房。
作為拉丁裔服務組織,我們一致支持提案G,因為我們的孩子、辛勤工作的家庭和長者應該得到更好的生活。11月5日,讓我們投票贊成提案G!
拉丁裔特別工作小組
信仰行動
米慎區經濟發展機構
動員民眾要求經濟和環境權利機構
三藩市拉丁裔平等與公平聯盟
聯合拯救米慎區
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市社區反對迫遷組織。
8
贊成提案G的付費論據
投票贊成提案G
讓我們的長者和工薪家庭住有所居。
最有可能無家可歸的三藩市人包括低收入長者、殘障人士和工薪家庭。
提案G每年將從市府收入中撥出800萬美元,幫助這些弱勢家庭繼續保有他們的住房。這是一項以小投資換取大收益的舉措。
贊成提案G,解決無家可歸問題的最佳方式就是預防!
Build Affordable Faster California
John Elberling
Peter Stevens
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:租客和屋主開發機構。
Paid Arguments Against Proposition G
無人提交反對提案G的付費論據
Legal Text
Describing and setting forth a proposal to the voters at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to establish the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and People with Disabilities to fund project-based rental subsidies for extremely low-income households consisting of seniors, families, and persons with disabilities, and to require the City to appropriate at least $8.25 million to the Fund annually starting in Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Section 1. Findings.
(a) California law requires the City to adopt a Housing Element that commits to approving an annual number of 1,748 units of housing, or 13,981 units total, over eight years, affordable to Extremely Low-Income (“ELI”) households with income up to 30% of the region’s Area Median Income (“AMI”). The rents affordable to households making 30% of AMI do not cover the costs of affordable housing projects, and as a result, project sponsors serving ELI households in affordable housing projects face a financial operating deficit. In addition, there are an insufficient number of higher-paying renters within affordable housing projects to cover the financial operating deficit that results from affordable rents for ELI households. Thus, project sponsors of affordable housing projects cannot subsidize a sufficient number of units for ELI renters to meet the City’s Housing Element goals and feasibly operate their affordable housing projects.
(b) Due to the high cost of developing and operating housing in San Francisco, most affordable housing rents are set at income limits that are out of reach for ELI households. The largest funding source for affordable housing development – the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) – is designed to make units affordable to households with incomes at 50%-60% of AMI, with rents up to twice that which would be affordable to ELI households. Additionally, the City’s Below Market Rate (“BMR”) units under the Inclusionary Housing Program (Planning Code Section 415 et seq.) are also out of reach for ELI (as well as very low-income) households, as the Inclusionary Housing Program only requires developers to set rents for low-income (55% of AMI), moderate-income (80% of AMI), and middle-income households (110% of AMI). Given these barriers to the production of affordable housing for ELI households, it is not surprising that the majority of affordable housing produced in San Francisco since 2005 has only targeted very low-income (30%-50% of AMI) and low-income (50%-80% of AMI) households.
(c) Seniors on fixed incomes and adults with disabilities are particularly rent-burdened. According to the Department of Disability and Aging Services (“DAAS”), there are approximately 52,600 households in San Francisco with a senior aged 62 years or older, and 20,000 households with a disabled adult aged 18-61 years. Of those households with a senior member, 33,900 income-qualify as ELI, and of those households with a disabled adult, 8,900 income-qualify as ELI.
(d) There are approximately 66,000 ELI households in San Francisco, and 80% of them are rent-burdened or paying more than 30% of their income on rent.
(e) While funding for the development and construction of affordable senior housing has historically been generated through affordable housing bond issuances, LIHTC, and MOHCD loans, the 15-year underwriting standards of private lenders and the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) require rents affordable to low income households that are well out of reach for ELI households. Many affordable senior housing projects lack the rent subsidies that would be necessary to maintain rents required under such underwriting guidelines while charging affordable rents to ELI seniors, meaning that the seniors most in need of safe, stable, and affordable senior housing end up in our city’s Single Room Occupancy (“SRO”) hotels or shelter system – or worse, on the streets.
(f) Approximately 12% (or 8,000) of ELI households are families with children. A full-time minimum wage worker in San Francisco makes approximately $37,600 per year. A single parent working full-time at a minimum wage job does not earn enough to pay or qualify for two- or three-bedroom units at the majority of the City's affordable housing developments as their income falls just under 30% of AMI.
(g) The DAAS estimates that there are 41,900 ELI households with a senior or disabled member and that over 56% of those households are rent-burdened. The median monthly income of a single-senior household is $1,511, and that of a household consisting of a single adult with a disability is $1,493 – or approximately 15% of AMI in both cases. The rent for a studio apartment at a majority of the City’s affordable housing developments is only affordable to households with incomes at or above 50% of AMI.
(h) More than 75% of all ELI residents in the City are people of color. Forty-eight percent of African American, 31% of American Indian, 23% of Latino, and 22% of Asian households are ELI. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City funded the Emergency Rental Assistance Program (“ERAP”). Of ERAP’s 23,462 applicants, more than half had incomes below 19% of AMI and over 85% had incomes below 30% of AMI. Twenty-seven percent of applicants identified as Black or African American and almost 21% identified as Latino.
(i) The San Francisco Reparations Plan 2023, prepared by the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, identified the establishment and enforcement of a City policy to prioritize the creation of low-income and acutely low-income housing based on 30% of AMI as a key policy recommendation (Policy Recommendation 1.5).
(j) The lack of stable and continuous operating subsidies leads to rents that disqualify the City’s neediest and most vulnerable populations, including rents for affordable housing acquired or preserved through bond funds. Affordable housing non-profits are struggling to acquire and preserve “small-sites,” funded through MOHCD, given the high cost of deferred maintenance and lack of operating subsidies to make the rents affordable to ELI households.
(k) Despite hundreds of millions raised from revenue measures, and unanimous Board of Supervisors support, the City’s budget has failed to fund crucial affordable housing strategies each year for ELI households, including seniors, families with children, and persons with disabilities. To ensure ELI households can afford to reside in the City’s affordable housing, the City must provide annual funding specifically to the City’s affordable housing serving ELI households.
(l) There have been dramatic cuts to United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) rental subsidy programs (including Section 8 low-income rent subsidies, HUD Section 202 housing program for seniors, and HUD Section 811 housing program for people with disabilities). The State of California does not fund any operating or rental subsidy programs.
(m) The Bay Area Housing Finance Agency (“BAHFA”) is expected to place a $20 billion regional affordable housing bond on the November 2024 ballot. While BAHFA’s Business Plan prioritizes the production of units for ELI households, the operating or rental subsidies needed to create ELI-affordable units are not an eligible use of bond revenue. The BAHFA Business Plan acknowledges that, “this housing type requires reliable, ongoing operating subsidies to successfully stabilize households’ tenancies” and that BAHFA expects to work closely with local jurisdictions to create the financing programs necessary to make ELI housing successful.
(n) This Charter Amendment addresses a chronic budgetary problem by setting aside a portion of the City’s existing revenue each year to fund project-based rent subsidies for existing and newly constructed or acquired permanent affordable housing for ELI households.
(o) The intent of this measure is to establish a minimum annual commitment of no less than $8.25 million, starting in Fiscal Year 2026-2027, to ensure access for ELI households to the City’s affordable housing. If there is a significant budget deficit, the funding for the first fiscal year may be reduced to $4 million and then will be $8.25 million in Fiscal Year 2027-2028 and thereafter.
(p) The City may fulfill its commitment to fund the expenditures this measure requires by appropriating funds from any number of sources, including but not limited to taxes collected under the Empty Homes Tax Ordinance (Business and Tax Regulations Code, Article 29A) and the Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax Ordinance (Business and Tax Regulations Code Article 28), or other similar special taxes, to the extent that the permissible expenditures in those special tax measures coincide with the expenditures this measure requires. Furthermore, any money in the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and People with Disabilities at the end of each fiscal year will be held in reserve for future use. Nothing in this measure requires that revenues from any special tax measure be appropriated for the uses in this measure.
(q) It is the further intent of this measure that the City maximize the number of ELI affordable housing units created by the Fund by entering into long term rent subsidy agreements with the City making annual contributions. The duration of such agreements should reflect the requirements of competitive regional, state and federal funding sources.
(r) It is the further intent of this measure to support the future growth and expansion of the Fund, subject to the future approval of voters, by developing sound, transparent, and effective policies with regular public reporting of program performance.
Section 2. The Board of Supervisors hereby submits to the qualified voters of the City and County, at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, a proposal to amend the Charter of the City and County by adding Section 16.132, to read as follows:
NOTE: Unchanged Charter text and uncodified text are in plain font.
Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman font.
Deletions are strike-through italics Times New Roman font.
Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Charter subsections.
SEC. 16.132. AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND FOR SENIORS, FAMILIES, AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.
(a) Establishment of Fund. There is hereby established the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and People with Disabilities (“Fund”) to be administered by the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”), or any successor agency. Monies therein shall be expended or used solely by MOHCD, subject to the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter. Monies in the Fund shall accumulate interest which shall be credited to the Fund, provided that the balance in the Fund exceeds $50,000. Any unexpended and unencumbered balance remaining in the Fund at the close of any fiscal year shall be accumulated to the Fund.
(b) Purpose of Fund. The purpose of the Fund is to increase and fund project-based rent subsidies for permanently affordable housing to make rents affordable for Extremely Low-Income Households.
(c) Definitions.
“Acutely Low-Income Disabled Persons” shall mean households consisting of persons eligible for accessible units for disabled households and earning up to 15% of Median Income.
“Acutely Low-Income Seniors” shall mean households consisting of seniors and earning up to 15% of Median Income.
“Extremely Low-Income Disabled Persons” shall mean households consisting of persons eligible for accessible units for disabled households and earning up to 25% of Median Income, and including Acutely Low-Income Disabled Persons.
“Extremely Low-Income Families” shall mean single adults or families earning up to 35% of Median Income.
“Extremely Low-Income Seniors” shall mean households consisting of seniors and earning up to 25% of Median Income, and including Acutely Low-Income Seniors.
“Fund” shall mean the Affordable Housing Opportunity Fund for Seniors, Families, and People With Disabilities, established in this Section 16.132.
“Housing Preservation Program” shall mean a program administered by MOHCD to preserve multifamily residential buildings or buildings with SRO Units as Permanent Affordable Housing that are at risk of loss of affordability or at risk of loss of the opportunity to create permanent housing affordability, due to vacancy decontrol or market speculation, and/or at risk due to their physical condition and need for life safety improvements.
“LOSP” shall mean the City’s Local Operating Subsidy Program that provides operating subsidies to residential buildings providing supportive housing for homeless individuals and families.
“Median Income” means the median income published annually by MOHCD for the City and County of San Francisco, adjusted solely for household size, and derived in part from the income limits and area median income determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the San Francisco area, but not adjusted for a high housing cost area.
“MOHCD” shall mean the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development, or any successor agency.
“Permanent Affordable Housing” shall mean a multifamily housing building or a building with SRO Units that is: (1) regulated and monitored by the City under a recorded deed restriction, recorded regulatory agreement, and/or ground lease ensuring permanent affordability for the useful life of the property but for no less than 75 years; (2) 100% of the residential units are restricted to income qualified households (except any manager units) with a maximum average of not more than 80% of Median Income across all units in a project, but not to exceed 120% of Median Income for any unit; and (3) with a rent for all units in a project affordable to such households, at initial residence and at re-rental at no more than 30% of the maximum household income. Permanent Affordable Housing may include principally permitted non-residential uses on the ground floor, and non-residential uses that are accessory to and supportive of the affordable housing.
“Senior Housing” shall mean a multifamily residential building that is specifically designed for and occupied by senior households and complies with all applicable federal and state fair housing laws.
“Senior Operating Subsidies (SOS) Program Fund” shall refer to the program established to receive any monies appropriated or donated for the purpose of providing project-based subsidies to new senior affordable housing developments funded by the City to maintain rents that are affordable to extremely low-income senior residents with incomes at or below 30% of Median Income, or any successor program.
“SRO Unit” shall mean a Single Room Occupancy Unit and shall mean a dwelling unit or group housing room consisting of the following: (1) no more than one occupied room with a maximum gross floor area of 350 square feet and meeting the Housing Code’s minimum floor area standards; (2) which may have a bathroom in addition to the occupied room; and (3) as a dwelling unit, has a cooking facility and bathroom or, as a group housing room, it shares a kitchen with one or more other single room occupancy unit(s) in the same building and may also share a bathroom.
(d) Annual Appropriations to the Fund.
(1) In Fiscal Year 2026-2027, except as provided in subsection (d)(3), the City shall appropriate $8.25 million to the Fund.
(2) In each year after Fiscal Year 2026-2027, and through Fiscal Year 2045-2046, the City shall appropriate to the Fund an amount not less than the prior year’s appropriation, adjusted by the percentage increase or decrease in aggregate discretionary revenues, as determined by the Controller, based on calculations consistent from year to year, provided that the City may not increase appropriations to the Fund under this subsection (d)(2) by more than 3% in any fiscal year. In determining aggregate City discretionary revenues, the Controller shall only include revenues received by the City that are unrestricted and may be used at the option of the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors for any lawful City purpose.
(3) Notwithstanding subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2), the City may reduce the amount appropriated to the Fund in any fiscal year when the City’s projected budget deficit for the upcoming fiscal year at the time of the March Joint Report or March Update to the Five Year Financial Plan as prepared jointly by the Controller, the Mayor’s Budget Director, and the Board of Supervisors’ Budget Analyst exceeds $250 million, adjusted annually beginning with Fiscal Year 2026-2027 by the percentage increase or decrease in aggregate City discretionary revenues, as determined by the Controller, based on calculations consistent from year to year; provided, however, that the amount appropriated to the Fund in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 shall be no less than $4 million and, thereafter, must be no less than $8.25 million in each fiscal year.
(4) The Controller shall set aside and maintain appropriations, together with any interest earned thereon, in the Fund.
(5) Commencing with a report filed no later than March 1, 2025, the Controller shall file annually with the Board of Supervisors, by March 1 of each year, a report containing the amount of monies from each non-general fund source projected to be available that may be appropriated to the Fund under this subsection (d).
(e) Uses of the Fund. The City, acting through MOHCD, shall disburse monies from the Fund through grants or other types of payments, on terms determined by MOHCD in its sole discretion. Any repayment of a grant or other payment from the Fund that the City receives will be returned to the Fund. Monies in the Fund shall be used to provide project-based rent subsidies only for new and existing Permanent Affordable Housing, provided that no more than 20% of annual funding from the Fund shall be used for the purpose of subsidizing existing Permanent Affordable Housing. Monies in the Fund shall be used to allow:
(1) Extremely Low-Income Seniors to afford a unit with rent restricted at 30% of 60% of Median Income in new or existing Permanent Affordable Housing that is Senior Housing and such households to pay a maximum rent not to exceed 30% of 15% of Median Income or 30% of 25% of Median Income, as applicable to the household’s income, with priority for Senior Housing that provides housing to persons at or over the age of 62; or
(2) Extremely Low-Income Families, prioritizing families with children, to afford a unit with rent restricted at 30% of 60% of Median Income in new or existing Permanent Affordable Housing, including a building with SRO Units, and such households to pay a maximum rent not to exceed 30% of 35% of Median Income; or
(3) Extremely Low-Income Disabled Persons to afford new or existing accessible units designated and designed for disabled households in Permanent Affordable Housing with rent restricted at 30% of 60% of Median Income and such households to pay a maximum rent not to exceed 30% of 15% of Median Income or 30% of 25% of Median Income, as applicable to the household’s income; or
(4) Extremely Low-Income Households to afford a unit with rent restricted at 30% of 60% of Median Income in an existing multifamily residential building, including an existing building with SRO Units, that will be acquired and preserved as Permanently Affordable Housing through funding under a Housing Preservation Program and such households to pay a maximum rent not to exceed 30% of 15% of Median Income, 30% of 25% of Median Income, or 30% of 35% of Median Income, as applicable to the household’s income.
Monies in the Fund shall not be used to provide rent subsidies directly to tenants to lease residential units, to provide subsidies for the sole purpose of an operating deficit, or to provide any other form of housing assistance that is not supporting Extremely Low-Income Households to afford a Permanent Affordable Housing unit. Except for expanding the availability of existing Senior Operating Subsidies (SOS) Program Fund programs, monies in the Fund shall not be used to replace or supplant funding for other rent subsidy programs existing as of the date this Section 16.132 was added to the Charter, including, but not limited to, LOSP housing or its successor programs.
(f) Implementation Policies and Annual Report.
(1) No later than June 1, 2025, MOHCD shall publish a report describing and analyzing implementation policy options that would maximize the number of ELI affordable senior, family, and accessible units through the provision of project-based rent subsidies in both new affordable housing and preservation projects.
(2) Beginning with the end of Fiscal Year 2026-2027, within 150 days of the end of each fiscal year, MOHCD shall file with the Board of Supervisors a report describing the status of any project authorized to be funded under this Section 16.132. MOHCD may combine such report with any other annual reporting obligations to the Board of Supervisors.
(g) Legislation. The City may enact ordinances establishing additional requirements for use of the Fund consistent with the purposes of this Section 16.132.
(h) Expiration. This Section 16.132 shall expire by operation of law on December 31, 2046, following which the City Attorney may cause it to be removed from the Charter unless the Section is extended by voters.