警員配備和延遲退休
市府是否應修改市憲章,以界定「全職宣誓的警務人員」的定義;要求警察局長每三年而不是兩年向警察委員會提交一份關於未來全職宣誓的警務人員配備的報告和建議;要求警察委員會每年向市議會報告警察局的人員配備;並制定一個可以續簽的五年計劃,允許警員在退休後繼續為警察局工作,並在工作期間延遲退休金支付?
本提案需要有50%+1的贊成票才能獲得通過。
摘要由選票簡釋委員會撰寫
現況:
警察委員會(委員會)負責監督三藩市警察局(警察局)。憲章規定,警察局長每兩年向委員會提交一份報告,說明目前全職宣誓的警務人員人數,並建議未來兩年全職宣誓的警務人員的足夠配備人員水平。委員會在批准警察局預算時必須考慮該報告和建議。
憲章並未界定「全職宣誓的警務人員」的定義。
三藩市僱員退休系統是市府僱員的退休和養老金系統。根據憲章,警務人員有資格享受退休福利,根據其報酬、年齡和服務年資獲得退休金。憲章不允許包括警務人員在內的市府僱員在退休後繼續為本市全職工作。但是市府可以重新僱用退休僱員,讓他們在領取退休福利的同時,每年為市府作有限時數的工作。
建議:
提案F將修訂憲章,界定「全職宣誓的警務人員」的定義為全職的警務人員,但那些長期休假者、在警察學院受訓的新募人員和派駐三藩市國際機場的警務人員除外。為減輕行政負擔,提案將要求警察局長每三年而不是兩年提交報告,說明目前全職宣誓的警務人員人數,並向委員會建議未來的人員配備。委員會將每年向市議會報告警察局在達成人員配備目標方面的進展,包括到2030年將警察局新招募人員中的女性比例提高到30%。
提案F將為合資格的警務人員設立「延遲退休選擇計劃」(DROP)。凡是年滿50歲、在警察局或其他執法機構具有至少25年合資格服務的警員、警長和督察的全職警務人員均可參加本計劃。參加者將以目前的工資和福利水平繼續在警察局全職工作。參加者無論以前從事何種任務,都必須同意執行街區巡邏或調查工作。參加者最多只能繼續工作五年。參加者原本在退休時開始領取的退休金會存入一個延稅計息的帳戶。參加者的DROP期結束時,必須停止為市府工作,每月領取附帶利息的遞延退休金。市議會可以限制DROP參加者的人數。
提案F授權DROP計劃最初為期五年。此後,市議會有權每五年繼續推行該計劃,直至期滿。
投「贊成」票的意思是: 如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您同意界定「全職宣誓的警務人員」的定義;要求警察局長每三年而不是兩年向警察委員會提交一份關於未來全職宣誓的警務人員配備的報告和建議;要求委員會每年向市議會報告警察局的人員配備;並制定一個可以續簽的五年計劃,允許警員在退休後繼續為警察局工作,並在工作期間延遲退休金支付。
投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您不同意做這些修改。
市主計官對提案「F」的意見書
市主計官Greg Wagner就提案F對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明:
我認為,如果建議的憲章修正案獲得選民批准,將對政府成本產生重大的影響。根據退休系統目前的精算假設和政策,修正案將導致市府第一年的成本增加60萬至300萬美元不等。在隨後幾年中,對成本影響的幅度將從每年節省約30萬美元到計劃實施後的第五年每年花費最多約300萬美元。
建議的憲章修正案將重新設立「延遲退休選擇計劃」(DROP)。選民在2008年2月批准了前版本的DROP(2008年的DROP),因市議會在2011年投票決定不再延長而終止。DROP的參加者將獲得工資和一個DROP的帳戶,三藩市僱員退休系統(SFERS)將把退休金存入該帳戶,並保證4%的回報率。參加者沒有升遷資格。與2008年的DROP不同,建議的憲章修正案明確規定警督和警監沒有資格參加DROP,而且參加DROP的警員必須同意從事外勤或調查工作。憲章修正案也清楚說明,如果警員申請並獲得傷殘退休,則不得參加DROP。
DROP對於市府的確實成本將取決於個別警員的退休決定。根據SFERS的估計,如果警員在本應繼續工作而非退休時選擇參加DROP,DROP將使2025–26財政年度的市府退休金僱主供款成本增加60萬美元,然後在2026–27財政年度與2029–30財政年度期間每年節省約20萬至40萬美元。相反,如果警員在本應退休時加入DROP,那麼2025–26財政年度的市府退休金僱主供款成本將增加300萬美元,2026–27財政年度和2027–28財政年度將小幅度降至260萬美元,到2029–30財政年度將回升至約300萬美元。
市府必須每五年(若非更早)評估DROP的淨成本影響。五年後,市議會必須重新授權或終止DROP。鑒於目前的警員配備水準和招聘率,DROP在短期內可能不會降低三藩市警察局的招聘成本。
2011年曾經估計,2008年的DROP每年將會增加市府退休金僱主供款,而使市府消耗約600萬美元。雖然與2008年版本相比,本修正案適用的僱員人數較少,但是以往的經驗顯示,DROP更有可能增加市府成本,而非持平或帶來節省。
建議修正案也界定「全職宣誓的警務人員」的定義,並將警察局長按規定向警察委員會報告警員配備水平的頻率從每兩年一次改為每三年一次。報告頻率的降低可能會給政府帶來些微的節省,但是目前無法估計節省的金額。
提案「F」如何被列入選票
2024年7月23日,市議會以8票對3票通過將提案F列入選票。市議會的投票如下:
贊成:Chan、Dorsey、Engardio、Mandelman、Melgar、Peskin、Safai、Stefani。
反對:Preston、Ronen、Walton。
以上陳述是本提案的中立分析。贊成和反對本提案的論據在本文後刊登。所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition F
投票贊成提案F——使三藩市警察局達至全員編制
提案F遏制三藩市警察局的警力持續流失,為前線警務人員、督察和警長提供強力的激勵,鼓勵他們延遲退休至多五年,來從事街區巡邏和調查工作。
三藩市警察局的人手嚴重不足。
• 三藩市警察局需要2,074名全職警員來維護三藩市的安全,但是目前短缺了500多名全職警員。
• 自2019年以來,三藩市警察局每年流失的警員人數都超過其招聘的人數。更令人擔憂的是:到2030年,將有近450名警員具有退休資格。
• 退休的速度可能會使三藩市警察局在五年內短缺人手近40%。
長期的警力不足危及公共安全。
• 它延遲了911的回應時間,進而影響居民、小企業和遊客的安全。
• 它使我們的城市永遠背負著無法無天、充斥犯罪企業的惡名。
• 它迫使納稅人在警務人員加班費上花費鉅額開支——高達三藩市警察局工資預算的近20%——向日益減少的警務人員支付更多的工資,以符合我們的基本安全需求。
• 它使我們的緊急回應負擔過重,有可能導致工作倦怠,對本市緊急回應者的身心健康造成不必要的傷害。
提案F有助於實現三藩市警察局的全員編制,加強公共安全。
• 提案F強化三藩市警察局的報告,以便更好地追蹤警務人員的招募,並履行三藩市到2030年顯著地招募更多女警的承諾。
• 提案F是一項具有成本效益和時間限制的計劃,可在三藩市解決警員招募危機的同時延遲警員退休。
更多詳情請瀏覽:FullyStaffSFPD.org
市議員Matt Dorsey
市議會主席Aaron Peskin
市議員Catherine Stefani
市議員Myrna Melgar
市議員Rafael Mandelman
市議員Ahsha Safaí
市議員Connie Chan
市議員Joel Engardio
Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition F
投票反對提案F:退休金和薪金雙領制不會確保我們的安全
支持者誤導選民。他們的大部分論據都沒有提及提案F的實際作用。
他們說,三藩市警察局人手嚴重不足,但是大多數警員在工作6或7年後就離職。提案F只適用於工作25年以上的警員。
他們說,納稅人要支付極高的加班費,佔三藩市警察局工資預算的20%,但是提案F將迫使納稅人雙重支付高年資警員,讓他們領取薪金的同時滾存退休金,使某些警員的個人收入高達50萬美元。
我們曾在2008年至2011年試過同樣的計劃,我們得知:
- 計劃以成本持平為賣點,但事實證明成本極為昂貴。
- 主計官發表報告,指出計劃無助於招聘或挽留警員。
- 警員提前退休以便參加計劃,並平均領取20多萬美元。
三藩市警察局表示,招聘人數正在上升,警員人數已恢復到2019年的水平。
幫助我們對抗錯誤資訊,將資金用於真正能保證我們安全的計劃。
投票反對提案F。
北加州美國公民自由聯盟(ACLU)
華人權益促進會
第9選區市議員Hillary Ronen
第5選區市議員Dean Preston
第10選區市議員Shamann Walton
公共辯護律師* Mano Raju
警察委員會委員* Jesus Yáñez
前警察委員會委員* Bill Ong Hing
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
Opponent's Argument Against Proposition F
反對提案F:浪費、無效、及不公平。
提案F是市政廳內部人員對一項已經嘗試過但失敗的政策重做。投票贊成提案F將會是贊成一項極其昂貴的計劃,三藩市人負擔不起,也不會讓我們更加安全。
- 浪費:提案F將迫使納稅人支付個別警員高達50萬美元的薪酬,允許他們在領取工資的同時享有在銀行滾存的退休金。儘管眾所周知三藩市警察局人手短缺,但是本提案不會增加多一位警員。向即將退休的警員雙倍支薪——包括那些因行為不當而接受調查期間退休的警員——並不能彌補每年即將退休的數百名警員。
- 無效:三藩市曾在2008年試過這項計劃,由於沒有證據顯示有助於警員留任或招募,因此在2011年理所當然地放棄計劃。提案F沒有提供任何理由讓時光倒流,再次回到這個昂貴、無效的構思,尤其是我們已經批准了本市歷來最大的警員留任計劃,並在今年向資深警員發放佔其工資17%的留任津貼(2026年將達20%)。
- 不公平:三藩市的其他公共安全工作者——消防員、社會工作者、911調度員——都沒有獲得如此大規模的留任福利,即使他們的工作場所正面臨嚴重的人手短缺。
在三藩市正面臨重大預算赤字的情況下,我們在提案F上浪費的每一美元都無法用來應對實際的公共安全問題。
投票反對提案F。
北加州美國公民自由聯盟(ACLU)
亞裔法律聯會
華人權益促進會
第9選區市議員Hillary Ronen
第5選區市議員Dean Preston
第10選區市議員Shamann Walton
公共辯護律師* Mano Raju
警察委員會委員* Jesus Yáñez
前警察委員會委員* Bill Ong Hing
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
Rebuttal to Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition F
作為專業執法人士,我們懇請三藩市市民與我們一起支持提案F
作為三藩市現任和前任警察局長( 以個人身份撰寫此文 ),以及代表宣誓保護我們城市的警務人員的工會組織,我們敦促三藩市市民支持提案F。
根據選民在2020年通過的獨立制定的工作量方法,三藩市目前需要2,074名全職警員才能充分保護全市的公共安全。不幸的是…
- 三藩市警察局目前比建議的警員配備水平少了500多名警員;而且
- 在未來五年,三藩市警察局將有近450名警務人員具有退休資格。
雖然三藩市警察局在招募新警員方面已開始取得實際進展,但要實現三藩市人應得的全員警力,有必要實施提案F這樣雄心勃勃的警員留任計劃。
在全國解決世代的警員短缺危機,三藩市在各大城市中並非獨一無二。但是,三藩市的經濟是建立在安全的基礎上歡迎通勤者、遊客、會展者以及留住本市市民,因此,三藩市無法承受警察局的人手短缺。
提案F是一項精心定制的計劃,將有助於…
- 激勵經驗豐富的警務人員延遲最多五年退休;
- 強調街區巡邏和調查工作;
- 儘量減少昂貴的加班費;
- 加強監督來招募更多女性警員;
- 擴大平民化的努力;以及
- 實現21世紀警察改革的承諾。
我們懇請您投票贊成提案F。
William Scott,警察局長*
Greg Suhr,前警察局長*
三藩市警察協會
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition F
1
贊成提案F的付費論據
投票贊成提案F。
公共安全至關重要。三藩市需要更多的警察來保護和服務居民。這項提案將修改確定宣誓警察人員配備建議的標準,並將警察局長提交人員配備報告的時間從每兩年一次改為每三年一次。
如果沒有執法部門和刑事司法系統,三藩市居民可能會處處面臨猖獗的破壞、暴力、盜竊和危險。執法專業人員可以為他們的工作感到自豪和滿足,因為他們的工作保證社會的安全,並使那些犯罪者對自己的行為負責。
-提案F有助於改善社區安全,最終使我們擁有社區徒步巡邏隊
-這是一項具有成本效益、為期5年的三藩市警察局人員重新配備人員計劃
-它將保護小企業,並最終在我們的街道上部署巡警
投票贊成提案F。
三藩市鄰里聯盟
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:三藩市鄰里聯盟。
2
贊成提案F的付費論據
自新冠疫情發生以來,我們在填補三藩市警察局的空缺方面遇到了巨大的人員配備問題。我們的警察人數比最低限度的人員配備還少500多名,而且無法透過警察學院培養足夠的新警察來彌補缺口。由於警察前往其他執法機構以及退休等原因,我們在實現全員編制方面不但沒有進展,反而面臨缺口不斷擴大的境地。
提案F將有助於阻止退休潮,讓有經驗的警察繼續工作,使我們有機會在未來幾年內填補最低警察配備的缺口,使三藩市更安全。在我們能夠解決新冠疫情期間造成的失衡問題之前,在街頭增派警察有助於保持三藩市更安全。
投票贊成提案F。
Moe Jamil
副市府律師及第3區市議員候選人*
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:Moe Jamil。
3
贊成提案F的付費論據
公共安全刻不容緩!提案F將立即發揮作用,增加並留住警察在我們的社區。
三藩市警察局維持城市安全所需的「全職」警力最低為2,074人,而目前的缺額超過500人。由於數百名現有警察即將退休,這個缺口可能還會擴大。
我們整個城市都感受到警力的短缺。從應急時間延長、露天毒品交易猖獗,到車輛盜竊案調查延遲,三藩市人要求改變現狀。解決警力短缺問題刻不容緩。
提案F是一個常識性的解決方案,能確保警察在街頭執勤、調查各類案件、在社區巡邏,和進行真正的警務工作。
提案F還將減少依賴昂貴的加班。在目前人手不足的情況下,我們的警察加班過度。
透過減少加班時間,三藩市將有助於避免警察職業倦怠。這會減少過度勞累、壓力大的警察發生使用武力而導致傷亡的慘劇。這不僅能挽救生命,還能為納稅人節省數百萬美元的法律費用。
為了更安全的街道和更安全的社區,投票贊成提案F。
制止犯罪行動
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:贊成提案F,三藩市人支持警察滿員編制。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是:反對提案B,停止徵收警察稅。
4
贊成提案F的付費論據
為了三藩市警察局人手充足—投票贊成提案F
三藩市能夠也應該成為美國最安全的大城市。然而,與美國所有其他主要城市一樣,我們也面臨了幾十年一見的警力短缺危機。綜觀全國,目前是現代史上執法人員招聘競爭最激烈的年代。
作為市長,我為警察招募的積極新策略提供了資金。我們已經使三藩市警察局成為入職警察薪酬最高的主要城市,而且現在警察學院的課程再次額滿。我們也從其他執法機構橫向招募人員,並取得了矚目的成果。
但是,我們還需要採取留住警察的策略,以便儘快讓三藩市警察局有充足的人員配備。
這就是我敦促您和我一起支持提案F的原因!
提案F…
- 包括一個具有成本效益、有時間限制的延遲退休選擇計劃(DROP),具有關鍵的保障措施,強化安全服務,並加快警方的反應時間。
- 為三藩市警察局的一線警察、督察和警長提供了強力的激勵機制,只要他們願意從事街區巡邏或調查工作,就可以延遲退休最多五年。
- 加強對招聘和文職化的監督,同時強調我們的女性警察比例在2030年達到30%的承諾。這將大幅減少我們對強制性加班的依賴。
我致力讓三藩市警察局恢復全員配備,以便停止毒品交易和盜竊,及保護居民、企業和弱勢長者。如果您也是...
投票贊成提案F!
市長London Breed
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:贊成提案F,三藩市人支持警察滿員編制。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是:反對提案B,停止徵收警察稅。
5
贊成提案F的付費論據
提案F是解決警察短缺問題的正確方法。
作為一名在公共安全領域工作近30年的專業人士,我可以證明執法機構目前在招聘和留任方面遇到了前所未有的挑戰。
三藩市縣警辦公室也面臨了類似的挑戰,而提案F為三藩市警察局提出的強化監督和延遲退休選擇計劃(簡稱DROP),是一個值得採用的方法。 這是一項具有成本效益、時間限制、策略針對性的計劃,其中包含關鍵的保障措施,可確保DROP的參與者提供前線的公共安全服務。
讓我們面對現實:長期人手不足的公共安全機構對任何人都沒有好處,對納稅人更是如此,因為他們最終要為昂貴的強制加班支付更多金錢。人手不足也會對執法人員的士氣、健康和安全造成極大的不利影響。同時,它也剝奪了三藩市市民應得的優質公共安全服務。
提案F是一項明智的做法。它將激勵我們最有經驗的公共安全專業人員延遲退休,繼續為本市服務。它的成功可以成為其他應急服務和執法機構— 包括我的機構— 的重要模式,改善三藩市的公共安全。
請和我一起投票贊成提案F。
縣警長Paul Miyamoto*
*作者僅以個人身份簽名,不代表任何組織。
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:贊成提案F,三藩市人支持警察滿員編制。
委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是:反對提案B,停止徵收警察稅。
6
贊成提案F的付費論據
DEAN PRESTON和提案F的官方反對者是「削減警察經費」的極端分子!
Dean Preston的意識形態對三藩市很危險,會使我們的城市變得不安全。
作為第5區市議員,Dean Preston支持將納稅人的金錢用在總額近60億美元的債券和預算預留,其中僅在本次選舉中就超過18億美元。然而,他卻宣稱每年300萬美元的延遲警察退休和實現三藩市警察局全員編制的計劃是「三藩市市民負擔不起的極昂貴計劃」?
不要相信Dean和這些偽君子。
Dean Preston「致力削減警察經費」 — 這是他說的話 — 三藩市的警察招募難題在很大程度上歸咎於他和現在反對提案F的政治盟友。
投票贊成提案F,為了三藩市警察局全員配備!
Scotty Jacobs,市議會第5選區候選人
這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:Scotty Jacobs。
Paid Arguments Against Proposition F
無人提交反對提案F的付費論據
Legal Text
Describing and setting forth a proposal to the voters at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to define the term “Full-Duty Sworn Officer”; modify the criteria for establishing recommended staffing levels for sworn officers; change the requirement for the Chief of Police to submit a staffing report from every two years to every three years; and establish a new voluntary Deferred Retirement Option Program (“DROP”) for the period from July 2025 – July 2030, for eligible members of the Police Department (in the rank of officer, sergeant, or inspector) that allows those members to earn additional deferred compensation in the Retirement System for up to 60 months in exchange for agreeing to perform neighborhood patrol or investigative work.
Section 1. Findings.
(a) In the wake of an unprecedented global pandemic that strained emergency and public safety responder staffing everywhere — one of several factors leading to a nationwide decline in police recruitment numbers — cities like San Francisco struggle to recruit new officers and offset the unusually high number of retirements facing our Police Department.
(b) In testimony before the Board of Supervisors in 2023, a San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD” or “Police Department”) commander described the City’s police understaffing crisis as “catastrophic for the Department if we cannot balance the attrition,” warning that: “We are losing members at a far faster rate than we are hiring, and this pattern will continue, and that gap will continue to widen for the next few years — unless we are able to do something drastic.”
(c) Chronic police understaffing enables elevated levels of public disorder and public nuisance, which continue to overwhelm many parts of San Francisco. These problems include open-air drug scenes, brazen street-level drug dealing, deteriorating street conditions, vehicular and commercial smash-and-grabs, retail thefts and street-level fencing in stolen goods, graffiti and malicious vandalism, and myriad property crimes plaguing numerous San Francisco neighborhoods and tourist destinations. These conditions hinder San Francisco’s post-COVID-19 economic recovery and fuel a public health crisis in drug overdose fatalities.
(d) In March 2017, the Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution urging the Police Commission to form a Task Force, in collaboration with the Chief of Police, on Strategic Police Staffing for the purpose of determining the best methodology for establishing SFPD staffing levels. That Task Force endeavored to determine SFPD staffing levels using a workload methodology based on the demand for police services rather than utilizing other metrics such as population size.
(e) In 2020, San Francisco voters amended the Charter to require the Police Department to submit a report and recommendations to the Police Commission every two years using the workload methodology and directed the Police Commission to use the report to inform the approval of the Police Department’s budget.
(f) The workload-based process, developed in partnership with an outside independent consultant, produced an initially recommended SFPD staffing level of 2,176 full-duty sworn officers (in 2021), which was subsequently revised to 2,182 sworn officers (in 2022) and then to 2,074 sworn officers (in 2023).
(g) Although the City has made worthwhile progress in recent years to develop a workload-based methodology to calculate the number of full-duty officers required to meet San Francisco’s policing needs, SFPD’s full-duty staffing level has dropped precipitously — by more than 23% — since 2020. Given the added urgency presented by the impending retirement of many officers, adjusting the method for establishing recommended minimum SFPD staffing levels — together with incentives to defer looming retirements with a focus on increasing deployments for patrol work and investigations — is prudent public policy.
(h) The urgency of addressing San Francisco’s chronic police understaffing crisis is not limited to public safety imperatives. It is creating needlessly expensive and wasteful inefficiencies, requiring significant overtime to run a short-staffed Police Department. In recent fiscal years, overtime has accounted for as much as 20% of SFPD’s entire salary budget. The reliance on overtime also burdens an already-understaffed workforce, increasing the risk of officer burnout and taking a toll on the physical and mental well-being of officers and their families.
(i) The City has made strides in hiring by approving the most competitive entry-level wages for new officers in the entire Bay Area. Additionally, through April of 2024, SFPD has made notable progress in recruiting lateral hires from other law enforcement agencies, with nearly one-in-four sworn officer hires having prior experience and certification in policing.
(j) Because lateral hires require significantly less time than newly hired recruits to qualify for deployment, this Charter Amendment aims to incentivize additional lateral hiring. It does so by extending to lateral hires the opportunity to apply their prior service toward eligibility for a new voluntary Deferred Retirement Option Program (“DROP”), thereby enhancing the value of a program historically focused on retention to new recruits as well.
(k) In 2008, the voters approved a Charter Amendment establishing the original DROP for certain members of the SFPD who had served at least 25 years and who were at least 50 years old. A deferred retirement program, like DROP, is a program that allows an employee who is eligible to retire to continue working while simultaneously drawing a pension. In the original DROP, participating officers would continue working at their prior salary and benefits while the City placed their monthly pension into an interest-bearing account (at 4% annual interest) that the employee would receive at the end of their participation in the DROP. During their participation in the DROP, officers were ineligible for promotion and the additional time served would not count towards added pension benefits. The original DROP was discontinued in 2011.
(l) Drawing on lessons from the previous DROP as well as best practices from other jurisdictions across California, this proposal contains significant reforms that: (1) limit DROP eligibility to the frontline ranks of officer, sergeant and inspector, with supervisory ranks from lieutenant through chief ineligible for the program, (2) require DROP participants to perform neighborhood patrol or investigation work, and (3) require participants to remain actively working for SFPD during their participation to address certain abuses observed in other jurisdictions.
(m) This Charter Amendment aims to accelerate favorable public safety impacts and help San Francisco achieve full police staffing by (1) restoring police staffing levels to the Charter and carrying forward the spirit of the 2020 Charter Amendment by periodically updating this number based on a scientific workload analysis, and (2) establishing a voluntary DROP program that would be offered to eligible members of the Police Department, to attract and retain sworn officers who will be deployed to district stations for patrol or investigative work.
Section 2. The Board of Supervisors hereby submits to the qualified voters of the City and County, at an election to be held on November 5, 2024, a proposal to amend the Charter of the City and County by revising Sections 4.127 and replacing expired text in Sections A8.900 through A8.910 to read as follows:
NOTE: Unchanged Charter text is in plain font.
Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman font.
Deletions are strike-through italics Times New Roman font.
Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Charter subsections.
SEC. 4.127. POLICE DEPARTMENT.
The Police Department shall preserve the public peace, prevent and detect crime, and protect the rights of persons and property by enforcing the laws of the United States, the State of California, and the City and County.
The Chief of Police may appoint and remove at pleasure special police officers.
The Chief of Police shall have all powers which are now or that may be conferred upon a sheriff by state law with respect to the suppression of any riot, public tumult, disturbance of the public peace, or organized resistance against the laws or public authority.
DISTRICT POLICE STATIONS. The Police Department shall maintain and operate district police stations. The Police Commission, subject to the approval by the Board of Supervisors, may establish additional district stations, abandon or relocate any district station, or consolidate any two or more district stations.
BUDGET. Monetary awards and settlements disbursed by the City and County as a result of police action or inaction shall be taken exclusively from a specific appropriation listed as a separate line item in the Police Department budget for that purpose.
POLICE STAFFING.
By no earlier than October 1 and no later than November 1 in 2025 and every odd-numbered third calendar year thereafter, the Chief of Police shall transmit to the Police Commission a report describing the Ddepartment’s current number of full-duty sworn officersFull-Duty Sworn Officers and recommending staffing levels of full-duty sworn officers Full-Duty Sworn Officers infor the subsequent two three fiscal years. Full-Duty Sworn Officers means full-time sworn members of the Department except those assigned to the San Francisco International Airport, those on long-term leaves of absence, and Police Academy recruits. The report shall include an assessment of the Police Department’s overall staffing, the workload handled by the dDepartment’s employees, the dDepartment’s public service objectives, the dDepartment’s legal duties, and other information the Chief of Police deems relevant to determining proper staffing levels of Full-Duty Sworn Officers full-duty sworn officers. The report shall evaluate and make recommendations regarding staffing levels at all district stations and in all types of jobs and services performed by full-duty sworn officers Full-Duty Sworn Officers. By no later than July 1 in 2028 and every odd-numberedthird calendar year thereafter, the Police Commission shall adopt a policy prescribing the methodologies that the Chief of Police may use in evaluating staffing levels, which may include consideration of factors such as workload metrics, the Department’s targets for levels of service, ratios between supervisory and non-supervisory positions in the Department, progress toward the Department’s “30 by 30 Pledge” to increase the representation of women in police academy recruit classes to 30% by 2030 and to ensure that police policies and culture intentionally support the success of women officers throughout their careers, whether particular services require a fixed number of hours, and other factors the Police Commission determines are best practices or otherwise relevant. The Chief of Police may, but is not required by this Section 4.127 to, submit staffing reports regarding full-duty sworn officers Full-Duty Sworn Officers to the Police Commission more frequently than every three even-numbered years.
Beginning in 2025, tThe Police Commission shall hold a public hearing regarding the Chief of Police’s staffing report by December 31 in every year in which the Chief of Police submits a staffing report between October 1 and November 1 odd-numberedcalendar year. The Police Commission shall consider the Chief of Police’s most recent report in its consideration and approval of the Police Department’s proposed budget every fiscal year, but the Commission shall not be required to accept or adopt any of the recommendations in the report.
The Board of Supervisors is empowered to adopt ordinances necessary to effectuate the purpose of this sSection 4.127 regarding staffing levels including but not limited to ordinances regulating the scheduling of police training classes.
Further, the Police Commission shall initiate an annual review and submit the following reports to the Board of Supervisors annually for the Board’s review: (1) a report on progress, obstacles, and additional needs, if any, for the successful recruitment and retention of Full-Duty Sworn Officers and to achieve and maintain the Department’s recommended staffing levels; (2) a report monitoring the progress toward the Department’s “30 by 30 Pledge,” as described above, including a description of the Department’s recruitment plan and an outline of milestones to achieve the pledge’s goals; and (3) a report on opportunities and plans to civilianize as many positions as possible and submit that report to the Board of Supervisors annually for review and approval. Beginning on January 1, 2030, the Board of Supervisors may by ordinance amend the reporting requirements in this paragraph.
PATROL SPECIAL POLICE OFFICERS. The Commission may appoint patrol special police officers and for cause may suspend or dismiss patrol special police officers after a hearing on charges duly filed with the Commission and after a fair and impartial trial. Patrol special police officers shall be regulated by the Police Commission, which may establish requirements for and procedures to govern the position, including the power of the Chief of Police to suspend a patrol special police officer pending a hearing on charges. Each patrol special police officer shall be at the time of appointment not less than 21 years of age and must possess such physical qualifications as may be required by the Commission.
Patrol special police officers may be designated by the Commission as the owners of a certain beat or territory which may be established or rescinded by the Commission. Patrol special police officers designated as the owners of a certain beat or territory or the legal heirs or representatives of the owners may dispose of their interest in the beat or territory to a person of good moral character, approved by the Police Commission and eligible for appointment as a patrol special police officer.
Commission designation of beats or territories shall not affect the ability of private security companies to provide on-site security services on the inside or at the entrance of any property located in the City and County.
POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PROGRAM (“DROP”)
A8.900 PREAMBLE ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF PROGRAM.
(a) It is critical to the health, the safety, and economic vitality of the City and County of San Francisco, that the City be able to recruit new Police Officers, and retain veteran Police Officers. Recent experience has demonstrated that the City's Police Department has had difficulty recruiting qualified Police Officers, and, more significantly, has had difficulty retaining the services of veteran Police Officers.
(b) There is a highly competitive labor market for the services of Police Officers. Additionally, due to the historical hiring patterns in this Department, hundreds of Police Officers will become eligible for normal service retirement in the next three to five years. The City Police Department is already three hundred officers below the Charter mandated staffing level.
(c) In order to address this recruitment and this retention problem, through this measure the voters establish a voluntary Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) which would be offered to members of the Police Department in order to create an incentive for the retention of experienced Police Officers, and as well, to attract new Officers.
(d) Specifically, as well, the voters intend that this Charter provision, if adopted, shall be "cost neutral" to the City; that is, it shall not impose new costs upon the City as a consequence of the participation by Police Officers in the DROP.
(e) Finally, in order that the cost impact of the DROP may be assessed, this measure additionally provides that at the end of the third year after the implementation of the Program, the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to data provided by the Police Department along with an analysis by the Controller of the City and County and the consulting actuary of the Retirement Board, shall determine whether the Program has been cost-neutral, and whether in light of its achievement of the goals of the measure, it should be continued for an additional three year term, and thereafter, subject to similar evaluations.
(a) Establishment. Sections A8.900 through A8.910 of the Charter hereby establish a voluntary Deferred Retirement Option Program (“DROP”).
(b) Purpose. The purpose of the DROP is to facilitate the retention and recruitment of police officers, with the ultimate goal of having a fully-staffed police force.
A8.901 ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PROGRAM.
(a) Sworn members of the Police Department occupying the rank of Police Officer (currentlyClassification Code Q2-Q4 as of 2024), Sergeant (currentlyClassification Code Q50-Q52 as of 2024), or Inspector (currentlyClassification Code 0380-0382 as of 2024) at their date of entry into the DROPProgram, shall be eligible to participate in the DROP for up to a maximum of 36 60 months from their date of entry into the DROPProgram, provided they otherwise meet the eligibility standards set forth in Section A8.901(cb). Sworn members of the Police Department occupying the ranks of Sergeant (currently Q50—Q52) and Inspector (currently 0380-0382) at their date of entry into the Program, shall be eligible to participate in the DROP of up to a maximum of 24 months from their date of entry into the Program, provided they otherwise meet the eligibility standards set forth in Section A8.901(c).
(b) Sworn members of the Police Department occupying the ranks of Lieutenant (currently Q60—Q62) and Captain (currently Q80—Q82) at their date of entry into the Program shall be eligible to participate in the Program for a maximum of 12 months from their date of entry into the Program, provided that they otherwise meet the eligibility standards set forth in Section A8.901(c). No sworn member of the Police Department occupying a rank above that of Captain shall be eligible to participate in the Program.
(c) To be eligible to participate in the DROP, a sworn member occupying one of the eligible ranks must additionally be an active employee of the San Francisco Police Department, have at least 25 years of service credit as a sworn member of the Department, including any service as a member of the San Francisco Airport Police or service credit granted through a lateral transfer,; and be at least 50 years of age at the time of entry into the DROPProgram; and . Additionally, a member must be either a “full duty sworn officerFull-Duty Sworn Officer” as that term is useddefined in Charter Section 4.127 or a member currently assigned to the San Francisco International Airport. Reciprocity must be established prior to participation in the DROP and the member must exit the DROP and retire from the reciprocal plan concurrently. As a condition of participation in the DROP, a sworn member shall agree to be assigned to a district station within the Field Operations Bureau to perform neighborhood patrol work, or to the Investigative Bureau to conduct investigations, As a condition of participation the sworn member mustand shall further agree to that they shall terminate their employment with the City through retirement at the conclusion of their participation in the DROPProgram.
A8.902 EFFECT OF DISABILITY ON CONTINUED PARTICIPATION.
(a) If, after a member becomes a participant in the DROP, the member shall becomes incapacitated for the performance of duty by reason of any bodily injury received in or illness caused by the performance of duty, said member will be eligible to apply for a retirement for incapacity and be subject to the same eligibility requirements provided elsewhere in this Charter as though the participant was not enrolled in the DROP. If a member receives a retirement for this duty related incapacity, said retirement shall be in lieu of the benefits provided in accordance with these DROP provisions, and the participant shall be paid an industrial disability retirement benefit as if the participant had never entered the DROP. Participation in the DROP terminates on the date the Retirement Board approves a DROP participant's application for disability retirement, after which no DROP distribution(s) shall be made. The DROP participant shall be paid an industrial disability retirement allowance as if they had never entered the DROP.
(b) If, after a member becomes a participant in the DROP, the member shall becomes incapacitated for the performance of duty by reason of any bodily injury received or illness not related to the performance of duty, said member will be eligible to apply to terminate participation in the DROP in accordance with Section A8.906. The participant will be paid the balance credited in their DROP Account, and will begin to receive a monthly payment as determined under Section A8.903, including any cost of living adjustments to which the member would otherwise be entitled.
(c) In the event a member shall becomes temporarily incapacitated for the performance of duty while participating in the DROP, the member is entitled to disability benefits only as provided for in this Charter. The member is thus no longer a "full duty sworn officer," as defined in Section 4.127 eligible to participate in DROP under Section A8.901(cb), and therefore the member's service retirement payments will be suspended for the period during which disability benefits are received. The member's DROP enrollment shall be extended for the period during which disability benefits were received, provided that this extension may not exceed 30 months one-half of the permitted maximum participation period for the rank occupied by the member at the time of enrollment in the DROP.
(d) In the event a member who is participating in the DROP applies for a retirement for incapacity, and the application remains unresolved at the conclusion of their DROP participation period, that member must leave the DROP when their participation period concludes, but they shall be permitted to continue on disability status with the Department until such time as their application is finally determined. In no event, however, shall any such member receive the distribution of their DROP Account until their disability retirement status is finally determined.
(e) Members waive any right to apply for or be granted a disability pension once they have taken distribution of the funds in their DROP account.
A8.903 THE EFFECT OF PARTICIPATION IN THE DROP UPON PENSION BENEFIT CALCULATIONS.
Upon the voluntary entry of a qualified member into the DROP, that member's Retirement System benefits, including survivor benefits, shall be frozen, and shall not be increased as a result of any additional service time, increase in age or compensation earned by the member while they are participating in the DROP. During the period of a member's participation in the DROP, the monthly service pension payment described herein shall be increased by any cost of living adjustment to which the member would otherwise be entitled, if retired, during the period of their participation in the DROP, pursuant to the terms of the retirement plan which applies to the member.
A8.904 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DROP ACCOUNT.
(a) The DROP Account is an account established for book-keeping purposes within the Retirement System for each member who elects to enter the DROP.
(b) Commencing with the first pay period after the entry of a member into the DROP, and for each pay period thereafter so long as the member participates in the DROP, the service pension (including any Cost of Living Adjustments) to which the member would otherwise be entitled based on their compensation, age, and length of service as of their date of their entry into the Program, shall be credited monthly into a DROP Account established within the Retirement System for each individual participant.
(c) A participating member, to the extent permitted by law and regulations established by the Retirement Board and the Board of Supervisors, may direct the crediting into that member's DROP Account the dollar value of any compensatory time off, accrued unused vacation, or accrued Sick Pay, if any, to which the member may be entitled, in lieu of receiving a payout of those amounts upon the date of entry into the DROP.
(d) The DROP Account into which the member's monthly service pension is credited shall also be credited on a monthly basis with interest at an annual effective rate of 4%four percent throughout the period of the member's participation in the DROP.
A8.905 RIGHTS OF SURVIVING SPOUSE, DOMESTIC PARTNER, OR DEPENDENTS.
(a) If a member shall die by reason of an injury received in, or illness caused by the performance of duty during the period of their participation in the DROP, the member's qualified surviving spouse, qualified registered/certified domestic partner, or other qualified dependents provided for in this Charter shall receive a death allowance pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Charter as if the member had never elected to enter the DROP. Whichever of the member's qualified surviving spouse, qualified registered/certified domestic partner, or other qualified dependents provided for in this Charter is entitled to receive this allowance may, instead of receiving the benefit under this paragraphsubsection (a), elect to receive a non-work related death benefit as specified in subsectionparagraph (b) below.
(b) If a member shall die during the period of their participation in the DROP for non-work related causes, the surviving qualified spouse, qualified registered/certified domestic partner, or other qualified dependents provided for in this Charter, shall be entitled to a post-retirement continuation allowance, along with any amounts credited to the deceased member's DROP Account, determined as if the participant had elected to voluntarily withdraw from the DROP under Section A8.906 on the participant's date of death. Such payments shall be made on the basis of beneficiary elections made by the member at the time of theirhis or her entry into DROP, and updated from time to time, as set forth in Section A8.905(d).
(c) In order for a surviving spouse or registered/certified domestic partner to be qualified for the monthly allowance described in this sSection A8.905, the member must have been married, or have established a domestic partnership within the time limits specified by this Charter. In order for surviving dependents to be qualified for the monthly allowance described in this sSection, such dependents must satisfy the requirements of the retirement provisions of this Charter. In any circumstance where the eligibility requirements specify the member's date of retirement, those requirements must be met at the date of entry into the DROP.
(d) A member who elects to participate in the DROP may designate a beneficiary for the proceeds of the member’s DROP Account in writing, not later than the time of entry into the DROP. The member may change the designation at any time prior to the distribution of the DROP Account. If the designated beneficiary predeceases the participating member, and the member becomes deceased before designating a new beneficiary, any distribution of the proceeds of the DROP Account shall be made to the estate of the member, pursuant to law.
(e) Notwithstanding the above provisions, a member's designation of a DROP Account beneficiary shall be subject to community property obligations, if any, under applicable California law.
A8.906 TERMINATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE DROP.
(a) A member's participation in the DROP shall be terminated, other than by death or disability, by the first occurrence of any of the following: (1) the member's completion of the applicable DROP participation period set forth in Section A8.901(a) or (b); (2) the member's voluntary termination of employment while a DROP participant; (3) involuntary termination of the member's employment; provided, however, that distribution of the member's DROP Account shall be deferred during the pendency of any hearing or appeal of the member's termination of employment. Should the member be reinstated to employment, the member may continue to participate in the DROP for the full duration of the member's original participation period. Any time during which the member was excluded from DROP participation shall not be deducted from the member's maximum participation period set forth in Section A8.901(a) or (b).
(a) DROP participation shall be terminated by the first occurrence of any one of the following events:
(1) Upon the member's completion of the 60-month DROP participation period, or upon their voluntary exit from the DROP at any time during the participation period.
(2) Involuntary termination of employment. At the member’s request, distribution of the DROP account will be withheld while the appeal of the member’s termination is pending. Should the member be reinstated, the member may continue to participate in the DROP if the account has been withheld. The period of the DROP participation will continue under the terms of the original application.
(3) Death of the member.
(4) Approval of disability retirement benefits under the terms of this Charter.
(5) Voluntary termination of employment prior to the completion of the DROP participation period.
(b) No interest shall accrue after any one of the events set forth in subsection (a) terminating the DROP.
A8.907 EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF THE MEMBER DURING PARTICIPATION IN THE DROP.
(a) During the period of a member’s participation in the DROP, the member shall continue to receive the regular compensation attached to the rank occupied by the member at the time of enrollment in the DROPProgram, and the member shall have all of the rights, privileges, benefits, and obligations of employment, including health benefits, attached to said rank, and shall be subject to all of the other terms and conditions of active employment in their respective rank and assignment. No member shall be eligible for a promotion during the time of their participation in the DROP.
(b) Notwithstanding the continued receipt by a participating member of the regular compensation and benefits attached to the rank and assignment which they occupy during their time in the DROP, no participating member shall receive service credit or compensation credit for retirement purposes pursuant to this Charter on account of their participation in the DROP. The member shall be subject to the employee contribution, as required by this Charter for all other active members of the Police Department, into the Retirement System. The City and County need not continue to make its required contributions for any DROP participant. Member contributions made during a participation in the DROP shall be deemed a contribution to the general assets of the Retirement System, and shall not be a part of the member’s DROP Account.
A8.908 COMPLIANCE WITH TAX LAWSAND IMPLEMENTATION.
(a) It is the intent of the voters that the DROP shall not jeopardize in any way the tax qualified status of the Retirement System under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, including, but not limited to, Section 415 of the Code, as amended.
(b) The Board of Supervisors shall adopt ordinances to implement the DROP, including to repeal or amend Administrative Code Sections 16.63 through 16.63-10 as necessary and appropriate to conform to revisions in the DROP as enacted at the November 5, 2024 election, and the Retirement Board shall adopt such rules as may be necessary to implement the DROP, regulate investment and distribution of the DROP contributions, establish forms and procedures for designating beneficiaries of the DROP Account, and all such other matters as may be necessary, in its discretion, to implement the Program, including the revisions as enacted at the November 5, 2024 election, by no later than July 1, 20082025 and to assure its tax-qualified character.
A8.909 DETERMINATION OF COST NEUTRALITY REAUTHORIZATION.
(a) The implementation of the DROP shall not result in any net increase in cost to the City. This determination shall take into account the costs associated with payroll, the expenditures associated with the recruitment and training of Police Officers, the costs of conducting academies for such recruits and trainees, the Field Training Officer costs, the retirement contributions made by members participating in the DROP, and the City, and the City's share of the return on the investment of the DROP funds, along with any other cost or savings elements related to the implementation of the Program. Notwithstanding this objective, the DROP shall be given a sufficient trial period to determine whether, as implemented, it is cost-neutral to the City as so defined. By no later than December 15 in the fifth year after the effective date of the DROP and every fifth year thereafter, the Board of Supervisors must act by motion to either reauthorize the DROP for an additional five-year period without amendment, or, if the reauthorization motion fails, allow it to expire.
(b) Not later than April 15, in the third year after the effective date of the DROP, a joint report prepared by the Controller of the City and the consulting actuary of the Retirement System documenting the net cost effect of the Program shall be submitted to the Board of Supervisors, and the Board shall determine by majority vote whether, on the basis of said report, the Program shall be renewed for an additional period of time as specified by the Board, but in no event beyond an additional three years.
(bc) By no later than December 15 in the fifth year after the effective date of the DROP, the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to data provided by the Police Department along with an analysis by the Controller of the City and County and the consulting actuary of the Retirement Board, shall determine the cost of the DROP, and whether in light of its achievement of the goals of the measure, it should be continued for an additional five-year term, and thereafter, subject to similar evaluations. The net cost effect of the DROPProgram shall be similarly evaluated periodically thereafter, pursuant to a schedule established by ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors by majority vote; provided, however, that in no event may such an evaluation be conducted less often than every three five years after the initial evaluation.
(c) The Board of Supervisors may by ordinance reduce or cap the number of new DROP requisitions available for the upcoming fiscal year. In setting any limit on the number of new DROP requisitions, the Board of Supervisors may consider the number of Full-Duty Sworn Officers then employed by the Police Department.
(d) If the Board of Supervisors determines not to renew the DROPProgram is not renewed by ordinance, those members then enrolled shall be permitted to complete their DROPProgram participation pursuant to the terms in effect when they entered into the DROPProgram.
(e) Should the DROP expire under subsection (a) and following the completion of participation in the DROP under subsection (d), the City Attorney may cause Sections A8.900 through A8.910 to be removed from the Charter.
A8.910 WITHDRAWAL OR ROLLOVER OF DROP ACCOUNTS.
(a) Upon the termination or conclusion of a member's participation in the DROP, the member shall be paid a lump sum equal to the balance in the member’s DROP Account, or, pursuant to the member's instructions, that balance shall be paid as a direct rollover into a qualified retirement plan. The Retirement Board shall establish rules, and may develop such forms as may be appropriate, regarding distribution of the DROP Account proceeds, the rollover of such proceeds into a qualified retirement plan, and the time periods within such which distributions may be made.
(b) Upon the voluntary withdrawal of a member from the DROP, or the expiration of their participation period, the member shall be deemed to be retired on a service pension and shall then commence receiving directly the monthly service pension amount calculated pursuant to Section A8.903, including any cost of living adjustments to which the member would have been otherwise entitled during the time of their participation in the DROP, and shall, for all other purposes under this Charter and sState law be deemed to be a retired member of the Police Department.
Section 3. At the February 5, 2008 election, the voters approved the addition of Sections A8.900 through A8.910 to the Charter, thereby establishing the Police Department Deferred Retirement Option Program (“DROP”). It was a program with an initial three-year term, and would expire unless extended by the Board of Supervisors. In 2011, following its initial three-year term, the DROP was not renewed by the Board of Supervisors, and thus expired by operation of law. But Sections A8.900 through A8.910 have remained physically in the Charter, albeit without legal effect.
Notwithstanding the “NOTE” regarding fonts at the beginning of Section 2 of this measure, Sections A8.900-A8.910 of the Charter amendment have been prepared using fonts for existing text and amendments to existing text, merely as a convenience and in recognition that the prior language was never physically removed from the Charter. The net effect is that the words in Section A8.900-A8.910 designated according to the “NOTE” as in plain font for “unchanged Charter text” and in single-underline italics Times New Roman font for “additions” constitute the text being adopted by the voters at the November 5, 2024 election.