Jump to navigation

  • 網站導引
  • 字型大小
  • 純文字
Mobile menu button
San Francisco Voter Guide logo
線上版三藩市選民資料手冊和選票樣本 全州聯合直接初選
2022年6月7日

Elections and accessibility

  • sfelections.org
  • 無障礙通行
  • English
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Filipino
  • 一般資料
    • 2022年6月7日選舉快速指南
      • 有疑問嗎?
      • 處長的信
      • 官方的選民資訊資源概覽
      • 選票簡釋委員會
      • 選舉委員會
      • 2022年新的選區分界線
      • 投票方法的選擇
      • 三藩市的官方選票投遞箱地圖和地點
      • 選民權利
      • 無障礙投票和服務
      • 多種語言的選民服務:中文協助
      • 免費英文班
      • hide
      • 6月7日選舉的選票
      • 標記您的選票
      • 三藩市選民登記和投票的常見問題
      • 關於被禁止的選舉活動
      • 三藩市投票系統概要
      • 確保您的選民登記資料處於最新狀態!
      • 選民登記資料隱私
      • 居家安全計劃
      • 重要提示!
      • 停止收到印刷版的《選民資料手冊》
      • 志願者! 成為投票工作人員!
      • 找到您的投票地點和您的選票樣本
      • XML Streams
      • Site Guide
  • 候選人資料
    • 候選人和職位資料
      • 自願經費限制
      • 候選人的政黨支持
      • 本次選舉中即將選出三藩市市縣的職位
      • 加州的初選
      • 您的候選人聲明
      All Candidate Statements
      所有候選人聲明
      Todas las declaraciones de las candidatos
      Lahat ng mga Pahayag ng mga Kandidato
    • 國會眾議員第11選區候選人
    • 國會眾議員第15選區候選人
    • 州眾議員第17選區候選人
    • 州眾議員第19選區候選人
    • 市府律師候選人
  • 地方選票提案
    • 地方選票提案和論據的資料
      • 三藩市債務概覽
      • 名詞解釋
      • 提案 A: Muni可靠性與街道安全債券
      • 提案 B: 樓宇檢查委員會
      • 提案 C: 罷免時間表和空缺任命
      • 提案 D: 受害者和證人權利辦公室;家庭暴力 受害者的法律服務
      • 提案 E: 奉命捐款
      • 提案 F: 垃圾收集和處理
      • 提案 G: 公共衛生緊急休假
      • 提案 H: 關於博徹思(Chesa Boudin)的罷免提案

您在這裡

  1. 首頁 ›
  2. 地方選票提案 ›
A
Muni可靠性與街道安全債券

MUNI可靠性與街道安全債券。為了通過修理、建設和改善惡化的Muni公車車場、設施、交通基礎建設和設備,建造及重新設計街道和人行道,來提高Muni 的可靠性、安全性和班次的頻密度、減少延誤、改善殘障人士通道及平等、擴大地鐵容量以及改善行人、自行車和交通安全,並支付相關費用;三藩市市縣是否應發行4億元的一般義務債券,從發行日起為期最多30年,預估平均稅率為每100元物業估值0.010元,預計平均年收入約為3千萬元,並受到公民監督和獨立審計?市府現行的債務管理政策是透過在舊公債清償時及/或稅基增長時發行新債券,以將用於償還市府一般義務債券的物業稅保持或低於2006年稅率,雖然物業稅稅率可能因應其他因素而有不同。

摘要 由選票簡釋委員會撰寫

現況:三藩市交通局(SFMTA)負責本市的地面交通。SFMTA負責監督城市鐵路(Muni),其中包括市內的公車、輕軌列車、有軌電車和纜車。SFMTA也負責監督自行車、停車、交通管理和信號燈、行人通道和安全以及計程車。 

城市交通基礎設施項目的資金來源包括聯邦和州政府的撥款,本地交通銷售稅,以及一般義務債券和收益債券。

建議:提案A是一項債券提案,授權市府透過發行一般義務債券,最多借貸4億元資金。

這筆債券資金可用於城市交通基礎設施項目,包括: 

• 2.5億元用於維修和翻新SFMTA的公車車場、設施和設備; 

• 2,600萬元用於改善交通,例如新的交通信號燈, 加寬公車站的人行道,以及專用交通車道;

• 1,000萬元用於改善Muni列車系統,包括列車通訊和控制系統; 

• 4,200萬元用於改善交通信號燈和人行橫道,例如更明顯的交通和行人信號燈、路邊坡道和標誌;

• 4,200萬元用於街道的重新設計,包括更寬的人行道、加高的人行穿越道、受保護的自行車道、公車道、登車島和更好的照明;以及

• 3,000萬元用於管理交通速度的項目,包括降低速度限制和測速雷達標誌。

根據本提案,債券資金只能用於有項目勞動協議的專案。項目勞動協議是市政府和工會之間的協議,規定了特定城市項目工程的僱用條款和細則,包括報酬和福利。

提案A也將預留資金給公民一般義務債券監督委員會審查這項債券資金的支出情況。

市府的政策限制借貸金額,即新債券須於以往債券還清後才可發行。若有必要,提案A將允許提高物業稅來償還這些債券。提案A允許業主將所增物業稅的至多50%轉嫁給租客。

投「贊成」票的意思是:如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您授權市府通過發行一般義務債券,為城市交通基礎設施項目借貸最多4億元。

投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您反對授權市府發行這些債券。

市主計官對提案「A」的意見書

市主計官Ben Rosenfield就提案A對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明: 

如果建議的4億元債券提案獲得通過,並在目前假設條件下售出,大致成本如下: 

a) 在2022至2023財政年度(財年),第一輪債券發行後,以及在稅率最低的一年,為發行這項債券提供資金的最佳稅率預估結果是,物業稅率為每100元的估值徵收0.00141元(每10萬元則是1.41元)。

b) 在2034至2035財政年度,最後一輪債券發行後, 以及在稅率最高的一年,為這項債券提供資金的最佳稅率預估結果是,物業稅率為每100元的估值徵收0.01126元(每10萬元則是11.26元)。

c) 從2022至2023財年到2044至2045財年,這些債劵平均稅率的最佳預估為每100元的估值徵收0.00961元(每10萬元則是9.61元)。

d) 基於上述預估,估值為60萬元的房屋的業主每年為這些債券支付的年度物業稅估計最高約為66.77元。

債券總償還金額之最佳預估為,包括本金和利息在內,如果建議的4億元債券全數發行並出售,將需償還大約6億9千萬元。上述估計僅基於預測,對市府並無法律約束力。預測和估計可能因債券銷售時間、每筆債券銷售金額,以及在債券償還期限中的實際估值而有所不同。因此,實際稅率和這些稅率的適用年份可能會與上述預估有所差異。市府現行的無約束力債務管理政策是透過在舊公債清償時且稅基增長時發行新債券,以保持用於償還市府一般義務債券的物業稅率低於2006年稅率,雖然該物業稅稅率可能因應其他因素而有不同。

提案「A」如何被列入選票

2022年3月1日,市議會以11票對0票通過將提案A列入選票。市議員的投票情況如下:

贊成:Chan、Haney、Mandelman、Mar、Melgar、 Peskin、Preston、Ronen、Safai、Stefani、Walton。

反對:無。

 

本提案需要有66⅔%的贊成票才能獲得通過。

贊成提案 A 的論據

提案A — Muni可靠性與街道安全債券 — 將改造本市的交通基礎設施,以確保快速、安全、清潔、可靠和方便的交通,使本市的交通系統更加環保,並為本市每個街區的所有三藩市居民改善街道安全和交通順暢。

提案A不提高稅金。由於債券是市府資本計劃的一部分,因此舊債券清償後由新債券取而代之,使稅率保持不變。

提案A將確保獲得配套的聯邦基礎設施資金,這將有助於加快交通改善,避免因延誤而產生的額外費用。

提案A投資於: 

快速和便利的交通

• 更快、更方便的公共交通,連接到全市各個目的地和區域公共交通系統

• 減少候車時間,並減少登車的延誤

• 乘坐更舒適的公共交通,沒那麼擁擠

改善安全和通行

• 改善十字路口,增進殘障人士的無障礙通行

• 減少街道上的碰撞、死亡和受傷事故

平等

• 可負擔的出行選擇和以改善的公共交通服務

• 減少碳排放、減緩車速、改善自行車和行人基礎設施,以此改善服務不足街區的安全和健康

更多的維修和保養

• 使用維修良好的基礎設施和系統提供更可靠的交通服務

• 更安全的十字路口,為駕駛人士提供更清晰的信號

• 使用新的路邊坡道和行人倒數計時信號,使過馬路更容易

一個強大的公共交通系統將有助於確保三藩市享有一個繁榮、公平的社區,使每個人都能更快、更可靠地抵達目的地,同時為駕駛人士減少擠塞情況。

我們敦促您對提案A投贊成票,以實現快速、可靠和方便的交通。 

市長London Breed 

市議會主席Shamann Walton 

市議員Connie Chan 

市議員Catherine Stefani 

市議員Aaron Peskin 

市議員Gordon Mar 

市議員Dean Preston 

市議員Matt Haney 

市議員Myrna Melgar 

市議員Rafael Mandelman 

市議員Hillary Ronen 

市議員Ahsha Safai 

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反駁贊成提案 A 的論據

提案A與仇恨或暴力犯罪所針對的通勤者「街道安全」毫無關係。

支出項目不能替代嚴格的刑事執法或罷免地方檢察官博徹思(Chesa Boudin)。 

MUNI已有用於升級、改善和維護的資金。

根據三藩市的10年資本計劃,提案A只增加了三藩市交通局預算的7.3%。48億元的資金已由地方、區域、州和聯邦來源提供。優先處理!

如果提案A獲得通過,與債券有關的物業稅將在四年內增加15%,其中一半的住宅份額由租客承擔。業主和租客每年已向債券持有人支付2.65億元。

三藩市的一般義務債券容量幾乎已經用盡。選民批准了6億元(2019年)用於可負擔房屋,以及2.45億元(2020年)用於無家可歸服務,這些都不是基礎設施!市府只剩下大約15億元,這意味著緊急基礎設施債券將面臨麻煩:地震安全、醫療保健和海濱安全。

提案A的4億元規模太大,時機不對,構思不周 — 這是疫情大流行前的想法。主計官預測市中心的全職勞動力將迅速恢復85%,這是通勤經濟不設實際的重新啟動。我們沒有能力重建為2019年設計的昂貴的MUNI 車隊、路線和員工隊伍。

三藩市必須為2022年在家工作、混合工作和靈活工作的格局重新設計交通,並做出明智的選擇,使MUNI能夠更加自立。

投票反對提案A。

Larry Marso 

transitbond.com

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反對提案 A 的論據

投票反對提案A... 

隨著三藩市走出疫情大流行,我們都想知道市區工作、市中心辦公室和通勤的前景。在家工作已被接受,視為常態,這對MUNI產生了極大的影響。

跟據《三藩市紀事報》報導,工作日的乘客量已驟降至2019年的一半左右,而且MUNI官員承認需要多年的時間才能瞭解COVID-19的影響。

市政廳盲目地將提案A匆匆列入選票,這將立即給三藩市帶來另外4億元的債券債務,並對所有物業徵收更高的稅金,包括更高的住宅物業稅,其中一半將以更高的租金轉嫁給租戶。

對於MUNI將把這筆錢用在何處或如何使用,並沒有明確的願景。

提案A還將首次把市議會荒唐和昂貴的「項目勞動協議」強加給MUNI,這種協議在大多數情況下終止了競爭性招標。

政客總是要求用債券來資助普通開支,例如維護道路、交通和學校,而他們卻把經常性收入花在那些支持率較低的項目上,例如市府的「非牟利組織」綜合體,它們對三藩市在可負擔房屋、無家可歸、藥物濫用和精神疾病方面的殘破政策有很大影響。

市政廳應該量入為出 — 少借錢!— 並在不增加稅收的情況下,以現有收入完成更多工作。三藩市有足夠的金錢來修復道路上的坑洞,維護火車、軌道和公車。

投票反對提案A。

您的一票非常重要。只要三分之一的選民就可以否決這項提案。

Larry Marso

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反駁反對提案 A 的論據

提案A將幫助我們的城市在擺脫疫情大流行的過程中重新走上正軌。一個可靠、快速、安全和可負擔的交通系統是恢復本地經濟工作的重要基礎。

三藩市最大的僱主們都承諾恢復各種安全的現場工作政策,這是努力恢復市中心大小企業所依賴的經濟活動的重要里程碑,並為我們的商店、餐館和辦公室重新注入活力和經濟支持。

提案A是我們現在可以採取的步驟,以確保我們的交通基礎設施處於良好的維修狀態,將人們快速、安全、可靠地送到目的地,減少公車之間的等待時間,更安全的登車平台,減少擁擠,並通過專用的交通車道更快地到達目的地。駕駛人士則受益於交通流量的改善和公車的良好維修,減少了阻塞街道的故障。

提案A具有明智的財政意義,它現在就可以利用聯邦配套資金,確保改善在公車、火車和行人安全的改進走得更遠,而且花費更少,而不是等待將來花費更多的維修費用。

而且提案A不提高稅金。 

請加入我們的行列,投票贊成提案A,以實現快速、安全、可靠、便利的交通。 

市長London Breed 

市議會主席Shamann Walton 

市議員Connie Chan 

市議員Catherine Stefani 

市議員Aaron Peskin 

市議員Gordon Mar 

市議員Dean Preston 

市議員Matt Haney 

市議員Myrna Melgar 

市議員Rafael Mandelman 

市議員Hillary Ronen 

市議員Ahsha Safai 

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
贊成提案 A 的付費論據

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A是對我們交通基礎設施的重要投資 

提案A – Muni可靠性和街道安全債券 - 將為我們系統的資本需求提供關鍵資金,支持基礎設施的改善,為本市的各鄰里社區提供可負擔、可靠和安全的交通選擇。

提案A不會提高稅金。因為債券是市府資本計畫的一部分,因此舊債券清償後由新債券取而代之,使稅率保持在2006年的水準。

交通設施資助並沒有跟上三藩市顯著的經濟成長,以及對於交通運輸系統日益增加的需求。

在疫情開始時,三藩市交通局(SFMTA)的營運虧損了數億美元,並減少基礎設施的投資以保持Muni運行。隨著聯邦救濟資金即將用盡,三藩市交通局資金的本地來源尚無著落。

在我們努力控制疫情影響之際,提案A是我們努力為所有三藩市居民提供快速、可靠和方便的交通,以及改善街道安全和交通流量的重要步驟。

Gwyneth Borden,三藩市交通局董事會主席*

Amanda Eaken,三藩市交通局董事會副主席*

Steve Heminger,三藩市交通局董事會董事*

Sharon Lai,三藩市交通局董事會董事*

Manny Yekutiel,三藩市交通局董事會董事*

Stephanie Cajina,三藩市交通局董事會董事*

*僅供識別身份;作者以個人名義簽名,並非代表某一組織。

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A投資於:

• 快速和方便的交通,縮短等車時間,減少登車後的延誤,並減輕駕駛人的擁堵路況。

• 改善安全和通行,通過改善十字路口,增進殘障人士的無障礙通行,使本市更接近零行人死亡的願景目標。

• 公平的交通系統,在所有鄰里社區提供可負擔的出行選擇和強化的公共交通服務。

提案A不會提高稅金,因為市府資本計畫在舊債券清償後由新債券取而代之,使稅率保持不變。

提案A通過提供配套的聯邦基礎設施資金,幫助市府以較低的成本進行所需的改善,避免因延誤產生的額外費用,具有明智的財政意義。

每個三藩市人都將從提案A受益 - 無論是步行、乘坐地鐵、騎自行車,還是開車。

www.yestommuni.com

參議員Scott Wiener

州眾議員Phil Ting

財政官Fiona Ma

Malia Cohen,加州公平委員會主席

估值官-記錄官Joaquin Torres

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

確保每個人獲得可負擔、清潔、安全、可靠和快速的交通,對於確保三藩市的企業和員工從COVID-19疫情中完全恢復至關重要。提案A將確保獲得聯邦配套資金,以目前較低的成本來滿足本市目前和未來的交通需求,而非在日後支付更多費用。

隨著員工開始返回市中心和本市各地的辦公室,他們需要從公車到火車的可靠、快速的公共交通來支持這一過渡,並確保人們能夠安全、準時地上班和回家。

我們的餐館和夜生活正在重新開放,人們很高興能夠外出吃飯、聽音樂,享受附近的酒吧。提案A提供改善基礎設施的資金,以確保我們的系統處於良好的維修狀態,為居民和遊客外出時提供安全、快速和方便的公共交通。

而且,舊債券會在新債券通過時清償,因此提案A不會提高任何人的稅金!

請加入我們,支持提案A!

Rodney Fong,三藩市商會主席兼執行長*

Ben Bleiman,三藩市酒吧業主聯盟創辦人*

金門大橋餐廳協會

www.yestomuni.com

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A是公交工作人員和乘客的雙贏

提案A不僅投資現代化的交通基礎設施,還投資於維持我們交通系統運行的男女工作人員。

提案A將通過更新過時的維修設施、公車車場和設備,提高Muni的可靠性和效率,同時創造高薪工作。

提案A使老化的設施和設備現代化,讓工作人員保持公車和火車正常運行,維修良好,減少乘客服務的中斷。

提案A有利於我們的交通基礎設施和每天辛勤工作、將我們帶到所需去處的三藩市人。

三藩市勞工理事會

三藩市建築行業理事會

卡車司機工會665地方分會

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

投票贊成提案A!

提案A通過更新設施和設備,實施保護和優先考慮公共交通乘客的保障措施,使Muni更可靠,並使我們的街道更安全。提案A會資助:

• 升級交通信號燈、路邊坡道、提醒駕駛人轉彎限制的標誌、行人倒數計時信號燈,以及新的和改進的照明。

• 安裝行人和自行車安全基礎設施,例如更寬的人行道、加高的人行穿越道、新鋪面、更安全的自行車道、公車道、更好的照明。

• 安裝環保基礎設施,如雨水收集、樹木和景觀設計。

• 降低速度限制,減少死亡、受傷和碰撞。

• 實施交通靜化和其他已證明能降低車速和事故的減速工具。

提案A通過提高安全來幫助三藩市實現「零死亡願景」,最終目標是消除交通死亡事故,優先考慮每個公交乘客的安全通行。

投票贊成提案A,就是投票支持安全的公共交通。

三藩市大眾運輸工具搭乘者

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

投票贊成提案A,支持安全的街道

在三藩市,平均每15個小時就有一個人因交通事故受傷而被送到醫院。我們的城市需要盡可能防止這些車禍。提案A將為行之有效的解決方案提供拯救生命的急需資金,使街道對每個人都更安全。

這項提案將會:

通過在由於資金不足而尚未修復的40%危險街道上重新設計人行穿越道和人行道,使步行到Muni更安全

通過更換舊的交通信號燈,給步行者「優先提醒」和更多時間過馬路,使他們在高風險的十字路口過馬路更安全

通過減少危險的超速行駛,使每個人更安全

漫步三藩市敦促您支持提案A。

漫步三藩市

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

住房和交通兩全其美!

可負擔的住房和高品質的交通對於繁榮和公平的城市都是至關重要的。作為世界級城市,三藩市的未來是擁有資金充足的公共交通系統,公平服務每個人,無論收入多寡或所在鄰里。

提案A為三藩市的公共交通系統注入必要的資金,為每個三藩市人提供方便、現代和可靠的交通。為了解決住房負擔性、氣候變化問題、從新冠疫情復甦,以及公平問題,我們必須始於資助有效率、安全、可持續和快速的公共交通系統。現在是時候投資城市的支柱Muni,它將每個人及時可靠地帶到工作地點和要去的地方。

讓我們在公共交通向前邁進,而不是倒退!

支持提案A!

SF YIMBY

住房行動聯盟

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

三藩市LGBTQ鄰里社區領導人支持提案A,因為它使民眾能夠公平使用本市的公共交通系統,並確保乘客能夠安全、快速、可靠地前往要去的地方。

無論是去市中心上班、在週末購物,還是和朋友出去吃飯,居民能夠依靠可靠、安全和準時的交通工具都是非常重要的。

通過基本的基礎設施改善,提案A投資於:

• 使用維修良好的基礎設施和系統提供可靠的交通服務

• 更快、更方便的公共交通,連接到全市各個目的地和區域公共交通系統

• 減少等待火車或公車的時間,並減少登車的延誤

• 乘坐公共交通更舒適而且較不擁擠

重要的是,提案A不會提高您的稅金。

請與我們一起投票贊成提案A,建立更可靠、更快速和更安全的Muni。

Alice B. Toklas LGBT民主黨俱樂部

州參議員Scott Wiener

市議員Rafael Mandelman 

灣區捷運董事Bevan Dufty

灣區捷運董事Janice Li

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A是對我們交通基礎設施的一項重要投資,將為本市各鄰里社區的公交乘客大幅改善出行體驗,使城市的交通系統更清潔,並且提升街道安全。

當我們從疫情走出時,公共交通系統也必須比以前更可靠、更快速、更清潔,並且公平服務我們所有的鄰里社區。

提案A投資可負擔的出行選擇和強化的公共交通服務,並且通過減少碳排放、減緩車速、改善自行車和行人基礎設施,以此提升服務不足鄰里社區的安全和健康

通過提案A可以確保獲得聯邦配套資金,以目前較低的成本實現改善,而非在日後後支付更多費用,因此具有明智的財政意義。

而且,提案A不會提高稅金。

每個三藩市人都應該擁有可負擔、清潔、安全和可靠的公共交通。

和我們一起支持提案A!

www.yestomuni.com

三藩市城市規劃與研究協會 (SPUR)

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A將確保三藩市的所有鄰里社區,從BayView Hunters Point到Fillmore和Western Addition,都能得到我們交通系統的更好服務。

我們都應該享有可靠、安全、清潔的地鐵和公車,使我們準時上班和上學。我們都應該享有安全無障礙的登車區,以及清楚標示的人行穿越道和路邊坡道,以保護行人和防止交通意外。

提案A為各鄰里社區的公平挹注投資,並為我們的交通系統提供所需的關鍵資金:

• 可負擔的出行選擇

• 加強服務不足鄰里社區的公共交通服務

• 減少碳排放、減緩車速、大幅改善自行車和行人基礎設施,以此提升服務不足鄰里社區的安全和健康。

• 縮短出行時間,增加獲得當地良好工作的機會

提案A不會提高稅金。

請投票贊成提案A,因為每個鄰里社區的居民都有權享有快速、可靠、安全和清潔的公共交通服務。

Shamann Walton,三藩市市議會主席

Malia Cohen,加州公平委員會主席

Amos Brown牧師

A. Philip Randolph學會

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

三藩市自行車聯盟支持提案A

我們設想交通系統在未來是民眾首選的出行方式,既能補充所有可持續的出行模式,也能安全通行。人們可以選擇搭乘Muni、騎自行車,或步行到他們需要去的地方。

提案A讓我們有機會升級已有數十年歷史的設施和基礎設施,降低車速,並以拯救人命的布局重新設計街道,優先考慮行人和自行車騎士,以此確保Muni的可靠性,進而實現我們的夢想。

三藩市自行車聯盟相信,對交通友好的城市就是對自行車友好的城市,我們鼓勵您投票贊成提案A!

三藩市自行車聯盟

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A將改善Muni網路的基礎設施,確保三藩市的每個人都能獲得可靠、可負擔、快速和安全的交通服務,無論您是在Excelsior、Mission或Tenderloin居住或工作。

提案A將使三藩市交通局的公車車場現代化,以確保公車和火車獲得有效率和及時的維護,並建設電動汽車充電的基礎設施,使環保公車車隊實現零排放的目標。

提案A將加寬公車站的人行道,使乘客能夠更快上車,並劃分公車專用車道,使公車不會堵在路上,減少出行時間。轉乘將更迅速方便,頻繁的班車意味著乘客不需要長時間等待下一輛公車。

這項提案將使我們的街道更安全,因為它實施了交通靜化措施,降低機動車車速度以減少車禍,並改善十字路口,增進殘障人士的無障礙通行。

和我們一起支持提案A,實現可靠、可負擔、快速的交通。

Joaquin Torres,估值官-記錄官

三藩市西班牙裔商會

Roberto Hernandez,CANA執行長

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據

提案A將使所有人受益。它投入資金修復MUNI,靜化交通,並使我們的街道更安全。

而且,這一切都不需要提高稅金。

長期拖延的維修和資金短缺使我們的公共交通系統變得不可靠。但是,提案A將通過使我們的鐵路系統現代化,維修、升級和翻新老化的設施和設備來解決這個問題。

隨著三藩市人口的不斷增加,我們必須對MUNI進行投資,使居民能夠方便進出所有的鄰里社區。提案A是一個世代難逢的機會,讓我們投資於現在和未來需要的MUNI系統。 

三藩市理應享有一個安全、清潔和有效率的公共交通系統。請與我們一起投票贊成提案A!

華埠交通研究和改進項目 (TRIP)

華協中心

三藩市華裔商會

Rose Pak民主黨俱樂部

Rosa Chen,三藩縣交通管理局公民諮詢委員會

Edwin M. Lee亞太民主黨俱樂部

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:更安全街道和可靠、無障礙交通委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的兩大貢獻者是:John Stewart公司,一樓公共事務公司。

贊成提案A的付費論據結束

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反對提案 A 的付費論據

反對提案A的付費論據

無論您是業主還是租戶,都不要把您辛苦賺來的稅金交給三藩市市政廳官員。提案A也不例外。投票反對提案A,這是一個4億美元的債券騙局。 

我們已經看到了市長London Breed和市議會在過去如何利用天馬行空、感覺良好的債券提案來誤導選民,最終使納稅人花費巨額,卻幾乎沒有任何可衡量的結果。 

不要忽視顯而易見的棘手問題: 

您是租戶嗎?對您的公寓樓徵收的房產稅將由房東轉嫁給您。沒錯,提案A允許50%的稅金轉嫁,所以您將支付更多租金。 

其次,提案A關於提高安全性的承諾是一個謊言。只要無賴的地方檢察官Chesa Boudin(博徹思)拒絕被追究罪犯責任,MUNI公車和火車的安全就無法得到有意義的改善。MUNI火車、公車、公車站的犯罪活動猖獗,毒品交易堵塞了附近的人行道。如果沒有包括刑事起訴在內的實際問責制,提案A無法解決任何問題。 

請向市政廳的貪婪官僚表示強烈反對。告訴他們不要再欺騙我們這些納稅人,而是利用他們現有的資金解決刑事起訴的問題,不要給租戶和房主造成負擔。投票反對提案A。 

Richie Greenberg,主席 

投票贊成罷免博徹思委員會 

RecallChesaBoudin.org 

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:投票贊成罷免博徹思委員會。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的三大貢獻者是:1.David Sacks,2.Daniel o'Keefe,3.Linn Yeaser Coonan。

反對提案A的付費論據

提案A模棱兩可的語言旨在允許MTA將債券收益用於災難性的項目或是他們喜歡的任何項目。

去年一月,中央地鐵專案承認最初的成本估計為19.3億美元,完工日期為2022年9月。 

它比預算高出3.53億美元,進度落後4年。聯邦政府出資約10億美元。目前,三藩市納稅人要支付4.39億美元,而且還在增加中。三藩縣交通管理局的一項調查顯示,三藩市交通局歷來從未按時或在預算內完成過一個項目!中央地鐵的最終成本將為21億美元,長度1.6英里,這太離譜了!

然而,SFMTA在2020年將每份90萬美元的「唯一來源」合約授予特殊利益實體,這些實體希望使汽車無法通行Twin Peaks、Great Highway和Golden Gate公園!他們把汽車妖魔化,卻忘記車主貢獻了每加侖67美分的高額汽油稅,以及當它想討好「朋友」時建造這些街道的資金。MTA無視競爭性招標,用納稅人的金錢來滿足它的政治議程!看看它的Taraval Street和Van Ness Avenue項目,耗費了多年時間仍然沒有完成。 

沒有任何官僚機構比得上三藩市交通局。不要用4億美元來獎勵它,讓納稅人再花6.9億美元來支付30年的利息!

投票反對提案A。

三藩市納稅人協會

發起人:法官Quentin L. Kopp(退休)會長

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:Quentin L. Kopp。

反對提案A的付費論據

請投票反對提案A。 

市交通局(MTA)總是需要資金用於交通基礎設施項目。但是這項債券提案僅資助大類項目,而不是具體項目,這將使一些項目獲得資金,而其他項目則沒有,而且沒有保障或有意義的監督。提案A不是我們目前需要的解決方案。 

交通運輸融資非常複雜。這些項目需要多年的開發、設計和建設。 

市交通局定期開發新項目,並且尋求資金。市交通局最近談到了良好維修狀態,這意味著適當維護現有設備、設施、街道和車輛。然而,市交通局被「加強」和「擴大」Muni Forward、Vision Zero而分心,無法落實維護核心基礎設施。 

更好的方法是現在為具體項目提供資金,維護城市的交通基礎設施。我們應該為未來做好準備,擁有現代化的Muni設施和車輛,以及運作正常、沒有破損的停車場、交通設備和街道。選民會支持一個乾淨的交通維護債券。 

市交通局也需要認真的治理改革,著重提供基本和有效的服務。 

提案A不是目前正確的答案。 

請投票反對提案A,謝謝您。 

David Pilpel 

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是:David Pilpel。

 

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
法律文本

Ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the City and County of San Francisco on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, for the purpose of submitting to San Francisco voters a proposition to incur the following bonded indebtedness of the City and County: $400,000,000 to finance the costs of construction, acquisition, and improvement of certain transportation, street safety and transit related capital improvements, and related costs necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes; authorizing landlords to pass-through 50% of the resulting property tax increase to residential tenants under Administrative Code, Chapter 37; applying provisions of Administrative Code, Section 6.27, requiring certain funded projects to be subject to a Project Labor Agreement; providing for the levy and collection of taxes to pay both principal and interest on such bonds; incorporating the provisions of Administrative Code, Sections 5.30 through 5.36, setting certain procedures and requirements for the election; finding that the proposed bond is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and finding that the proposed bond is in conformity with the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b), and with the General Plan consistency requirements of Charter, Section 4.105, and Administrative Code, Section 2A.53.

Note: Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman; 
deletions are strikethrough italics Times New Roman.

          Board amendment additions are double underlined.  

          Board amendment deletions are strikethrough normal.  

Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:

Section 1.  Findings.

A.  This Board of Supervisors (“Board”) recognizes the City’s current street, transit and transportation infrastructure (“Street, Transit and Transportation System”) is unable to meet current and future demands, and that the reliability, efficiency and safety of City streets, transit and transportation infrastructure requires modernization and new investment to maintain a state of good repair and to meet future demands.

B.  The cost of making the necessary and required improvements to the Street, Transit and Transportation System was estimated by the Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force (dated February 2013) at $10.1 billion over the next 15 years (referred to herein as the “2030 Task Force”).

C.  The work of the 2030 Task Force was supplemented by the Mayor’s 2045 Task Force (dated January 2018) which identified additional transportation investment funding needs of $22 billion.

D.  Both the 2030 and 2045 Task Force Reports were augmented by the efforts of Transportation 2050 (“Transportation 2050”) to update the vision for transportation developed though the City’s ConnectSF process, including additional community input received through the SFMTA’s 2021 Citywide Community Survey.

E.   Transportation 2050 outlines the resources needed to achieve a community-driven vision and identify revenue and reliable funding solutions to fund the cost of  transportation needs in San Francisco, which includes, among other resources, the issuance of general obligation bonds.

F.  A significant number of Muni bus yards and facilities were constructed decades ago, with some being over one hundred years old, and are obsolete and need to be repaired, upgraded and rebuilt to allow for Muni buses to be repaired faster, prevent breakdowns to support reliable Muni service.

G.  On-street infrastructure improvements for public transit helps reduce travel times and delays for Muni and enables more reliable and more frequent service.

H.  Muni’s train control system is over 20 years old and is obsolete and needs to be replaced to increase subway capacity, reduce delays and deliver reliable, high-frequency Muni Metro light rail service.

I.    Redesigning and constructing streets to improve safety, accessibility and visibility for pedestrians and cyclists, and implementing traffic calming and speed reduction tools supports the City’s Vision Zero policy goal to eliminate all traffic deaths in San Francisco.

J.  A strong public transit system is one of the most important tools the City has to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change, reducing mobility gaps across the City as documented in the MUNI Service Equity Strategy, and by improving the reliability and speed of Muni service and creating safer spaces for pedestrians and cyclists, San Francisco will become a more livable and sustainable place to live.

K.  The Board recognizes the need to make substantial investments in the City’s Street, Transit, and Transportation System to create a system that is more reliable, safe, equitable, and efficient and that such investment will expand job access and connectivity for underserved communities in the outer neighborhoods of the City, and in this way the City’s transportation investment will meet future demands on the transportation system, while sustaining the economic dynamism and resilience of the City.

L.   The Board further recognizes that sustainable transportation includes inclusive investments that support the City’s transit and transportation workforce and the participation of the City’s local and disadvantaged business enterprises.

M.  The Muni Reliability and Street Safety General Obligation Bond (“Bond”) will provide a portion of the funding necessary to construct, improve and rehabilitate the Street and Transportation System (as further defined in Section 3 below).

N.  This Board now wishes to describe the terms of a ballot measure seeking approval for the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance all or a portion of the City’s improvements to its Street and Transportation System as described below.

O.  The City’s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds at or below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and/or the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors; provided however, the City’s debt management policy shall not be construed as impairing or limiting the obligation of the City to levy taxes to pay principal and interest on the bonds authorized under this Ordinance.

Section 2.  A special election is called and ordered to be held in the City on Tuesday, the 7th day of June, 2022, for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the City a proposition to incur bonded indebtedness of the City for the projects described in the amount and for the purposes stated:

“MUNI RELIABILITY AND STREET SAFETY GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND.  $400,000,000 of bonded indebtedness to increase Muni’s reliability, safety and frequency to, among other things, reduce delays, improve disabled access and equity, increase subway capacity and improve pedestrian, bicycle and traffic safety by repairing, constructing and improving deteriorating Muni bus yards, facilities, transportation infrastructure and equipment, and constructing and redesigning streets and sidewalks, subject to citizen oversight and independent, regular audits; and to pay related costs; with a duration up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.010/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of approximately $30,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits; authorizing landlords to pass-through to residential tenants in units subject to Chapter 37 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (“Residential Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance”) 50% of the increase in the real property taxes attributable to the cost of the repayment of the bonds; and applying the provisions of Administrative Code Section 6.27, requiring certain funded projects to be subject to a Project Labor Agreement.  The City’s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds at or below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and/or the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.”

The special election called and ordered shall be referred to in this ordinance as the “Bond Special Election.”

Section 3.  PROPOSED PROGRAM.  All contracts that are funded with the proceeds of bonds authorized hereby shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 83 of the City’s Administrative Code (“First Source Hiring Program”), which fosters construction and permanent employment opportunities for qualified economically disadvantaged individuals.  In addition, all contracts that are funded with the proceeds of bonds authorized hereby also shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 14B of the City’s Administrative Code (“Local Business Enterprise and Non-Discrimination in Contracting Ordinance”), which assists small and micro local businesses to increase their ability to compete effectively for the award of City contracts, to the extent the Local Business Enterprise and Non-Discrimination Contracting Ordinance does not conflict with applicable state or federal law.  Notwithstanding any exclusion applicable to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency contained in Administrative Code Chapter 6.27 (“Citywide Project Labor Agreement Ordinance”), contracts funded with proceeds of bonds authorized hereunder, which bonds are issued on or after June 7, 2022, shall be subject to Project Labor Agreements that include all of the required terms set forth in subsection (e) of Administrative Code Section 6.27 and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 6.27, as Section 6.27 may be amended from time to time, unless the application of this requirement would cause the City to violate the conditions of a state, federal, or other funding source.  The Board of Supervisors may, by Ordinance, modify the June 7, 2022 deadline to accommodate the negotiation of Project Labor Agreements. 

A.  CITIZENS’ OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE.  A portion of the Bond shall be used to perform audits of the Bond, as further described in Section 15.  

Projects to be funded under the proposed Bond may include but are not limited to the following (as further described in the Bond Accountability Report, on file with the Clerk in File No. 211290, which is incorporated by reference as set forth in full herein): 

B.   MAKING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM WORK BETTER.  A portion of the Bond may be allocated to the repair, renovation and modernization of SFMTA bus yards, facilities and equipment through the agency’s Building Progress Program to speed up Muni repairs and maintenance.

C.   MUNI NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS.  To enable faster, more frequent, and more reliable Muni service, a portion of the Bond may be allocated to improve certain network improvements, including but not limited to smart signals, wider sidewalks at bus stops, and dedicated traffic lanes. 

D. MUNI RAIL MODERNIZATION.  To improve train operation’s speed, reliability and capacity, a portion of the Bond may be allocated to strengthen and expand critical components.  

E.   STREET SAFETY AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR SAFETY AND FLOW.  To improve street safety and traffic signals, a portion of the Bond may be allocated to more effectively manage congestion in the City, improve the overall reliability of the transit system, and improve pedestrian safety by replacing obsolete and deteriorating traffic signal infrastructure, and installing pedestrian countdown signals and audible pedestrian signals to improve visibility and the overall safety and efficiency of the City’s transportation network.

F.   ON-STREET IMPROVEMENTS.  To enhance and modernize City streets, a portion of the Bond may be allocated to enhance streets and sidewalks, including but not limited to curb bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, and improved sidewalks at intersection corners; median islands; various bikeways including separated bikeways; bicycle parking; and installing basic infrastructure to decrease the cost of future projects, such as underground signal conduit.

G. SPEED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT.  A portion of the Bond may be allocated to fund traffic calming and other speed reduction improvements to make streets safer.

Section 4.  BOND ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

The Bond shall include the following administrative rules and principles:

A.  OVERSIGHT.  The proposed bond funds shall be subjected to approval processes and rules described in the San Francisco Charter and Administrative Code. Pursuant to S.F. Administrative Code 5.31, the Citizen’s General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee shall conduct an annual review of bond spending, and shall provide an annual report of the bond program to the Mayor and the Board.

B.   TRANSPARENCY.  The City shall create and maintain a multilingual web page outlining and describing the bond program, progress, and activity updates.  The City shall also hold an annual public hearing and reviews on the bond program and its implementation before the Board of Supervisors, Capital Planning Committee, and the Citizen’s General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee.

Section 5.  The estimated cost of the bond financed portion of the project described in Section 2 above was fixed by the Board by the following resolution and in the amount specified below:

Resolution No. 52-22, $400,000,000.  

Such resolution was passed by two-thirds or more of the Board and approved by the Mayor of the City (“Mayor”).  In such resolution it was recited and found by the Board that the sum of money specified is too great to be paid out of the ordinary annual income and revenue of the City in addition to the other annual expenses or other funds derived from taxes levied for those purposes and will require expenditures greater than the amount allowed by the annual tax levy.

The method and manner of payment of the estimated costs described in this ordinance are by the issuance of bonds of the City not exceeding the principal amount specified.

Such estimate of costs as set forth in such resolution is adopted and determined to be the estimated cost of such bond financed improvements and financing, as designed to date.

Section 6.  The Bond Special Election shall be held and conducted and the votes received and canvassed, and the returns made and the results ascertained, determined and declared as provided in this ordinance and in all particulars not recited in this ordinance such election shall be held according to the laws of the State of California (“State”) and the Charter of the City (“Charter”) and any regulations adopted under State law or the Charter, providing for and governing elections in the City, and the polls for such election shall be and remain open during the time required by such laws and regulations.

Section 7.  The Bond Special Election is consolidated with the General Election scheduled to be held in the City on Tuesday, June 7, 2022.  The voting precincts, polling places and officers of election for the June 7, 2022 General Election are hereby adopted, established, designated and named, respectively, as the voting precincts, polling places and officers of election for the Bond Special Election called, and reference is made to the notice of election setting forth the voting precincts, polling places and officers of election for the June 7, 2022 General Election by the Director of Elections to be published in the official newspaper of the City on the date required under the laws of the State of California.

Section 8.  The ballots to be used at the Bond Special Election shall be the ballots to be used at the June 7, 2022 General Election.  The word limit for ballot propositions imposed by San Francisco Municipal Elections Code Section 510 is waived.  On the ballots to be used at the Bond Special Election, in addition to any other matter required by law to be printed thereon, shall appear the following as a separate proposition:

“MUNI RELIABILITY AND STREET SAFETY BOND.  To increase Muni’s reliability, safety and frequency, reduce delays, improve disabled access and equity, increase subway capacity and improve pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic safety by repairing, constructing and improving deteriorating Muni bus yards, facilities, transportation infrastructure and equipment, and constructing and redesigning streets and sidewalks; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $400,000,000 in general obligation bonds, with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.010/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of approximately $30,000,000, subject to citizen oversight and independent audits?  The City’s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds at or below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and/or the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.”

Each voter to vote in favor of the issuance of the foregoing bond proposition shall mark the ballot in the location corresponding to a “YES” vote for the proposition, and to vote against the proposition shall mark the ballot in the location corresponding to a “NO” vote for the proposition.

Section 9.  If at the Bond Special Election it shall appear that two-thirds of all the voters voting on the proposition voted in favor of and authorized the incurring of bonded indebtedness for the purposes set forth in such proposition, then such proposition shall have been accepted by the electors, and bonds authorized shall be issued upon the order of the Board.  Such bonds shall bear interest at a rate not exceeding applicable legal limits.

The votes cast for and against the proposition shall be counted separately and when two-thirds of the qualified electors, voting on the proposition, vote in favor, the proposition shall be deemed adopted.

Section 10.  For the purpose of paying the principal and interest on the bonds, the Board shall, at the time of fixing the general tax levy and in the manner for such general tax levy provided, levy and collect annually each year until such bonds are paid, or until there is a sum in the Treasury of said City, or other account held on behalf of the Treasurer of said City, set apart for that purpose to meet all sums coming due for the principal and interest on the bonds, a tax sufficient to pay the annual interest on such bonds as the same becomes due and also such part of the principal thereof as shall become due before the proceeds of a tax levied at the time for making the next general tax levy can be made available for the payment of such principal.

Section 11.  This ordinance shall be published in accordance with any State law requirements, and such publication shall constitute notice of the Bond Special Election and no other notice of the Bond Special Election hereby called need be given.

Section 12.  The Board, having reviewed the proposed legislation, makes the following findings in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq., the CEQA Guidelines, 15 Cal. Code Regs., Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq., (“CEQA Guidelines”), and San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 31 (“Chapter 31”): 

As set forth by the Planning Department, in a determination dated October 21, 2021, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No. 211290 and incorporated in this ordinance by reference, the Board finds that the bond proposal  is not subject to CEQA.  As the establishment of a government financing mechanism that does not involve any commitment to specific projects to be constructed with bond funds, it is not a project as defined by CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.  The use of bond proceeds to finance any specific project or portion of any specific project will be subject to approval of the applicable decision-making body at that time, upon completion of planning and any further required environmental review under CEQA.

Section 13.  The Board finds and declares that the proposed Bond is (i) in conformity with the priority policies of Section 101.1(b) of the San Francisco Planning Code, (ii) in accordance with Section 4.105 of the San Francisco Charter and Section 2A.53(f) of the San Francisco Administrative Code, and (iii) consistent with the City’s General Plan, and adopts the findings of the Planning Department, as set forth in the General Plan Referral Report dated November 18, 2021, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board in File No. 211290 and incorporates such findings by reference.

Section 14.  Under Section 53410 of the California Government Code, the bonds shall be for the specific purpose authorized in this ordinance and the proceeds of such bonds will be applied only for such specific purpose. The City will comply with the requirements of Sections 53410(c) and 53410(d) of the California Government Code.]

Section 15.  The Bonds are subject to, and incorporate by reference, the applicable provisions of San Francisco Administrative Code Sections 5.30 – 5.36 (“Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee”).  Under Section 5.31 of the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee, to the extent permitted by law, one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) of the gross proceeds of the Bonds shall be deposited in a fund established by the Controller’s Office and appropriated by the Board of Supervisors at the direction of the Citizens’ General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to cover the costs of such committee.

Section 16.  The time requirements specified in Section 2.34 of the San Francisco Administrative Code are waived.

Section 17.  The City hereby declares its official intent to reimburse prior expenditures of the City incurred or expected to be incurred prior to the issuance and sale of any series of bonds in connection with the Project (collectively, the “Future Bonds”).  The Board hereby declares the City’s intent to reimburse the City with the proceeds of the Future Bonds for the expenditures with respect to the Project (“Expenditures” and each, an “Expenditure”) made on and after that date that is no more than 60 days prior to adoption of this Resolution.  The City reasonably expects on the date hereof that it will reimburse the Expenditures with the proceeds of the Future Bonds.

Each Expenditure was and will be either (a) of a type properly chargeable to a capital account under general federal income tax principles (determined in each case as of the date of the Expenditure), (b) a cost of issuance with respect to the Future Bonds, (c) a nonrecurring item that is not customarily payable from current revenues, or (d) a grant to a party that is not related to or an agent of the City so long as such grant does not impose any obligation or condition (directly or indirectly) to repay any amount to or for the benefit of the City.  The maximum aggregate principal amount of the Future Bonds expected to be issued for the Project is $400,000,000.  The City shall make a reimbursement allocation, which is a written allocation by the City that evidences the City’s use of proceeds of the applicable series of Future Bonds to reimburse an Expenditure, no later than 18 months after the later of the date on which the Expenditure is paid or the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three years after the date on which the Expenditure is paid.  The City recognizes that exceptions are available for certain “preliminary expenditures,” costs of issuance, certain de minimis amounts, expenditures by “small issuers” (based on the year of issuance and not the year of expenditure) and expenditures for construction projects of at least 5 years.

Section 18.  The appropriate officers, employees, representatives and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do everything necessary or desirable to accomplish the calling and holding of the Bond Special Election, and to otherwise carry out the provisions of this ordinance.

  • Text-only version
  • 地方選票提案和論據的資料
    • 三藩市債務概覽
    • 名詞解釋
    • 提案 A: Muni可靠性與街道安全債券
    • 提案 B: 樓宇檢查委員會
    • 提案 C: 罷免時間表和空缺任命
    • 提案 D: 受害者和證人權利辦公室;家庭暴力 受害者的法律服務
    • 提案 E: 奉命捐款
    • 提案 F: 垃圾收集和處理
    • 提案 G: 公共衛生緊急休假
    • 提案 H: 關於博徹思(Chesa Boudin)的罷免提案

關注我們!



© SF Department of Elections all rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

  • 一般資料
  • 候選人資料
  • 地方選票提案