Jump to navigation

  • 網站導引
  • 字型大小
  • 純文字
Mobile menu button
San Francisco Voter Guide logo
線上版三藩市選民資料手冊和選票樣本 聯合普選
2022年11月8日

Elections and accessibility

  • sfelections.org
  • 無障礙通行
  • English
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Filipino
  • 一般信息
    • 2022年11月8日選舉快速指南
      • 有疑問嗎?
      • 處長的信
      • 官方的選民資訊資源概覽
      • 選票簡釋委員會
      • 選舉委員會
      • 2022年新的選區分界線
      • 三藩市市議會選區地圖
      • 投票方法的選擇
      • 三藩市的官方選票投遞箱
      • 志願者! 成為投票工作人員!
      • 選民權利
      • 協助三藩市未來選舉的外展宣傳!
      • 無障礙投票和服務
      • 多種語言的選民服務:中文協助
      • 免費英文班
      • hide
      • 2022年11月8日選舉的選票
      • 標記您的選票
      • 三藩市選民登記和投票的常見問題
      • 關於被禁止的選舉活動
      • 三藩市投票系統概要
      • 確保您的選民登記資料處於最新狀態!
      • 選民登記資料隱私
      • 居家安全計劃
      • 重要提示!
      • 停止收到印刷版的《選民資料手冊》
      • 找到您的投票地點和您的選票樣本
      • XML Streams
      • Site Guide
  • 候選人資料
    • 候選人和職位資料
      • 自願經費限制
      • 候選人的政黨支持
      • 本次選舉中即將選出三藩市市縣的職位
      • 加州的選舉
      • 您的候選人聲明
      All Candidate Statements
      所有候選人聲明
      Todas las declaraciones de las candidatos
      Lahat ng mga Pahayag ng mga Kandidato
    • 國會眾議員第11選區候選人
    • 國會眾議員第15選區候選人
    • 州眾議員第17選區候選人
    • 州眾議員第19選區候選人
    • 教育委員會候選人
    • 社區大學董事會候選人
    • 灣區捷運董事第8選區候選人
    • 估值官-記錄官候選人
    • 地方檢察官候選人
    • 公共辯護律師候選人
    • 市議會第2選區候選人
    • 市議會第4選區候選人
    • 市議會第6選區候選人
    • 市議會第8選區候選人
    • 市議會第10選區候選人
  • 地方選票提案
    • 地方選票提案和論據的資料
      • 三藩市債務概覽
      • 名詞解釋
      • 提案 A: 退休人員補充生活費調整; 退休委員會與執行總監的合約
      • 提案 B: 工務局及委員會、衛生與街道局及委員會
      • 提案 C: 無家可歸者監督委員會
      • 提案 D: 可負擔房屋 — 創制提案請願書
      • 提案 E: 可負擔房屋 — 市議會
      • 提案 F: 圖書館保護基金
      • 提案 G: 學生成功基金 — 對三藩市聯合校區的撥款
      • 提案 H: 在偶數年舉行的市府選舉
      • 提案 I: 金門公園內甘迺迪大道(JFK Drive) 以及大公路(Great Highway)的車輛
      • 提案 J: 金門公園內甘迺迪大道(JFK Drive) 的休閒使用
      • 提案 K: 按三藩市高等法院命令, 提案K已在選票上移除。
      • 提案 L: 用於交通項目的銷售稅
      • 提案 M: 住宅單位的空置稅
      • 提案 N: 金門公園地下停車設施; 金門公園廣場管理委員會
      • 提案 O: 用於市立大學的額外地塊稅

您在這裡

  1. 首頁 ›
  2. 地方選票提案 ›
N
金門公園地下停車設施; 金門公園廣場管理委員會

市府是否應被允許使用公共資金收購、經營或補貼金門公園音樂廳地下停車場的公共停車位,並指示金門公園廣場管理委員會解散,將停車場的管理權移交給市府的康樂和公園委員會?

摘要 由選票簡釋委員會撰寫

現況:康樂和公園委員會(下稱委員會)監督並制定康樂和公園管理局的政策。康樂和公園管理局負責管理本市的公園、遊樂場和康樂中心。

在1998年6月,選民批准了一項提案,建立一個稱為金門公園廣場管理委員會(下稱管理委員會)的非營利組織,負責在音樂廳下面建造一個不使用公共資金的地下停車場。該提案並未提及使用公共資金來經營停車場的問題。

管理委員會和委員會將地下停車場的空間租給一個非營利組織,由它負責管理並使用停車場的收入用作支付營運費用和償還建築貸款。市議會制定停車場的收費率。

建議:提案N將允許市府使用公共資金收購、營運或補貼音樂廳地下停車場的公共停車位。

提案N還提議解散管理委員會,將職責移交給委員會。

投「贊成」票的意思是:如果您投「贊成」票,即表示您希望允許市府使用公共資金來收購、營運或補貼金門公園音樂廳地下停車場的公共停車位,並指示管理委員會解散。

投「反對」票的意思是:如果您投「反對」票,即表示您反對進行這些變更。

市主計官對提案「N」的意見書

市主計官Ben Rosenfield就提案N對本市財政的影響發表以下聲明:

在我看來,如果建議的創制法令獲得選民通過,可能會減少政府的成本,因為法令將允許市府對現有的金門公園廣場管理委員會的債務進行再融資,這可能會為市府節省未來的成本。

本法令將修訂1998年金門公園振興法案,允許市府使用公共資金收購、營運或補貼金門公園廣場地下停車設施的公共停車位。擬議的法令沒有明確規定停車設施的公共資金用途,將由市長和市議會透過正常的預算程序決定。

本法令還將解散金門公園廣場管理委員會,並將停車設施和其他廣場管理委員會財產的管轄權移交給康樂和公園管理局。

提案「N」如何被列入選票

2022年6月21日,選務處收到市長Breed簽署的一項擬議法令。

根據《市政選舉法》,市長可透過此種方式將一項法令列入選票。

本提案需要有50%+1的贊成票才能獲得通過。

贊成提案 N 的論據

支持提案N,以改善金門公園的進出便利和減少交通擠塞

提案N將支持改善依賴駕駛的人士進出金門公園的機會,讓市府對金門公園音樂廳停車場的管理和停車費用有更大的靈活性。

目前,金門公園音樂廳的地下停車場並未完全滿足公眾的需求。停車費定價高,而且停車場在一年中的大部分時間都是空置的。

為什麼提案N會列在選票上 

提案N允許市府將公共資金用於停車場,使管理和設定停車費用更有靈活性,並幫助市府實現政策優先事項,包括改善那些依賴車輛獲得通道去享用金門公園的遊客。市府可以將資金用於停車場,以實現政策目標,包括但不限於:

• 為殘障遊客提供停車補貼 

• 為低收入遊客提供停車補貼 

• 優化定價以履行財政義務,同時確保停車場的費用是遊客可負擔得起 

提案N也可以改善停車管理和更靈活的定價。這些變化將有助於確保停車位隨時可用且可負擔的,進而減少停車場和街道上的堵塞。此外,更好的管理和靈活的定價將有助於償還建設停車場的未償債務。

我敦促您投票贊成提案N,以改善金門公園的進出便利和減少交通擠塞。 

市長London Breed 

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反駁贊成提案 N 的論據

沒有提交反駁反對提案N_的論據

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
贊成提案 N 的付費論據

贊成提案N的付費論據

三藩市民主黨支持提案N

提案N是一項常識性的提案,將確保每個想遊覽金門公園的人都能做得到。

通過將目前音樂廳地下停車場移交由三藩市娛樂和公園管理局管理,可以將停車費設定在確保需要開車去公園三藩市老年人、低收入家庭和殘障人士的能夠負擔的水平。

提案N有助於推動更多的人通行於我們安全、綠色的開放空間和金門公園的世界級機構。

三藩市民主黨人呼籲你們投票贊成提案N。

三藩市民主黨

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是: Yes on Prop N, Committee for Accessibility & Reduced Traffic Congestion。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是: A San Francisco for All of Us。

贊成提案N的付費論據

投票贊成提案N,以使金門公關的停車場更加方便和實惠。

我們城市最大的公共公園,金門公園,是由三藩市娛樂和公園管理局管理的。金門公園的停車場也應該由三藩市娛樂和公園管理局管理,而不是由私人管理,以更好地支持公平和使用的機會。

有800 個車位的停車場建在金門公園的音樂廳下,以減少公園內的車流,並直接連接到迪揚博物館和加州科學館。但長期以來,由於價格昂貴,該停車場一直沒有被訪客充分利用,導致很多人開車進入公園和在公園裡附近尋找免費停車位。

在三藩市娛樂和公園管理局的管理下,停車位將能夠以支持公平和使用目標的費率來設定,例如提供停車折扣給需要開車去公園的三藩市老年人、殘障人士和低收入家庭。

更明智的停車管理意味著可以更快償還剩餘的停車場債務 – 然後收益可用於金門公園持續的無障礙設施改善和服務。

這項常識性提案將益於我們的公園和每個想來享受公園的人 – 並終於將釋放停車場的潛力,以支持更公平和使用機會,以及減少金門公園的車流。請投票贊成提案N。 

Walk SF 

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是: Yes on Prop N, Committee for Accessibility & Reduced Traffic Congestion。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是: A San Francisco for All of Us。

贊成提案N的付費論據

提案N確保金門公園的音樂廳停車場得到有效利用,使市府和鄰近的博物館能更好地服務需要駕車前往公園東部的金門公園遊客。

停車場的智能管理包括為低收入和有殘障的遊客提供停車費補貼,並確保在需要時提供停車位,減低遊客在公園內繞行尋找街道停車位的需要。

我們認同,市府可以而且應該做更多的工作,使公園的東端更方便被更多的遊客造訪。管理停車場是實現許多無障礙設施改進的第一步。

提案N具有智能的環境和良好的政府意識。我們呼籲你們支持提案N。

三藩市環保選民聯盟

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是: Yes on Prop N, Committee for Accessibility & Reduced Traffic Congestion。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是: A San Francisco for All of Us。

贊成提案N的付費論據

提案N將有助於減少金門公園內街道的擁堵,使我們的公共開放空間對每個人都更安全。

目前,由於停車費用昂貴,停車場的使用率不高,導致汽車在金門公園和附近的街道上繞圈,尋找其他停車位。更多繞行的汽車對每個人來說都意味著更危險的街道。

提案N使市政府在管理停車場和制定停車費方面有更大的靈活性,這將確保那些需要停車的人能夠負擔得起,並使汽車離開地面街道。按照提案N,市府可以為低收入和有殘障的訪客降低停車費用,改善所有人通行公園的便利性。

我們呼籲你投票贊成提案N,以改善金門公園的交通便利性,減少交通擁堵。

Kid Safe SF

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是: Yes on Prop N, Committee for Accessibility & Reduced Traffic Congestion。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是: A San Francisco for All of Us。

贊成提案N的付費論據

金門公園是我們城市中的一片綠洲,擁有安全的開放空間和世界級的機構,每個人都應該能夠進入和享受。

提案N增加了那些需要開車的人進入金門公園的機會。目前,有800個車位的地下停車場價格過高、利用率低、而且管理不善。由於市府能控制停車費,提案N讓每個人都能更方便地使用停車場,而且需要停車的人更能負擔得起。

提案N讓停車場能夠提供折扣給老年人、殘障人士、低收入家庭和來自權益優先社區的人。更多來四面八方的人將能夠遊覽公園和其中景點。

提案N減少了司機在街道邊停車時可能與其他司機和遊覽公園的人發生衝突,因為減少了駕車人士在街道上停車的需要,這樣使我們的公園空間更安全。使用停車場的人可以從Fulton街直接到達停車場入口,或從林肯路通過MLK大道到達。

為了通行和安全,請投票贊成提案N。

SF YIMBY 

GrowSF 

Streets for People 

城市環保主義者

Northern Neighbors 

發展列治文區

Southside Forward 

這項論據的刊登費用的資金真正來源是: Yes on Prop N, Committee for Accessibility & Reduced Traffic Congestion。

向委員會提供資金的真正來源的唯一貢獻者是: A San Francisco for All of Us。

贊成提案N的付費論據結束

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
反對提案 N 的付費論據

沒有提交反對提案N的付費論據

所登載論據為作者意見,其準確性未經任何官方機構校核。英文原文的拼寫及文法錯誤均未經改正。中文譯文與英文原文儘可能保持一致。
法律文本

Ordinance amending the Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998 (“Proposition J”) to state that the City may use public funds to acquire, operate, or subsidize public parking in the Golden Gate Park Concourse Underground Parking Facility (“Parking Facility”); directing the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority (“Concourse Authority”) to commence dissolution proceedings; and, upon said dissolution, transferring jurisdiction of the Parking Facility and certain other property from the Concourse Authority to the Recreation and Park Department, repealing Proposition J in its entirety, and deleting references to the Concourse Authority from the Municipal Code.

NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain font.

Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font.

Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font.

Asterisks (*   *   *   *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables.

Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:

Section 1.  Background.  

(a)   On June 2, 1998, San Francisco voters adopted Proposition J, the Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998.  Proposition J authorized the creation of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority (the “Authority”), a non-profit public benefit corporation, that would have the power to (1) construct a parking facility (the “Garage”) under the Music Concourse (the “Concourse”) at Golden Gate Park using only private funds, and then to operate the Garage, (2) improve the Concourse surface area, and (3) study and recommend traffic and transit infrastructure plans for Golden Gate Park.  In addition, Proposition J authorized the Board of Supervisors to set aside property in or near the Concourse for the Garage and to place such property under the jurisdiction of the Authority, provided that upon dissolution of the Authority, jurisdiction would revert to the Recreation and Park Commission.  

(b)   On September 4, 1998, the City adopted Resolution No. 715-98, which set aside certain property in Golden Gate Park for the Garage and placed it under the Authority’s jurisdiction. On November 21, 2003, the City adopted Resolution No. 737-03, which placed additional property under the Authority’s jurisdiction and approved a 35-year ground lease (the “Lease”) between the Music Concourse Community Partnership (“MCCP”), as tenant, and the City, acting through the Authority and the Recreation and Park Department, as landlord.  The Lease authorized MCCP to construct the Garage on the property at its own expense, and subject to certain budgetary approvals of the City, to use Garage revenues to pay off the debt it incurred to construct the Garage and ongoing operating costs.  The MCCP continues to operate the Garage under the Lease, and the Recreation and Park Department has been performing the duties of the Authority as landlord.  

 (c) On May 7, 2022, following multiple hearings and extensive public comment, the City enacted Ordinance No. 74-22, which approved the Golden Gate Park Access and Safety Program (“the Program”).  The Program builds on traffic and infrastructure recommendations of the Authority in furtherance of Proposition J, and comprises a series of proposals intended to improve traffic safety and expand public access to the Park.  Recognizing the key role of the Garage in these efforts, the Board of Supervisors in Ordinance No. 74-22 urged the Recreation and Park Department to work with the MCCP, as well as with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, the Mayor’s Office on Disability, the Fine Arts Museums, and other stakeholders, to increase usage of the Garage, which has been underutilized in recent years.

(d) As an interim step towards these efforts, it is appropriate to amend Section 7 of Proposition J, to clarify that the prohibition against using public funds to construct the Garage does not restrict the City from using public funds on the Garage now that the Garage is fully constructed, notwithstanding the Lease and MCCP’s outstanding construction debt.  The purpose of this amendment is to allow the City to consider measures such as acquiring the Garage from MCCP; assisting further with Garage operations; and/or subsidizing public parking at the Garage.  But in clarifying the ability of the City to use public funds for such purposes, this measure does not approve any specific action by the City at this time.  Any future approvals shall be subject to all applicable laws, including without limitation the California Environmental Quality Act and the City’s Charter.

(e) Separate and distinct from allowing the use of City funds on the Garage, it is also appropriate for the Authority to commence dissolution proceedings.  The Authority no longer holds regular meetings, and Section 3 of Proposition J contemplated the eventual dissolution of the Authority, and the key purposes of Proposition J have been fully achieved: the Garage was constructed in 2006, the original surface improvements to the Concourse have been completed, and the Authority has issued traffic and transit infrastructure plans for Golden Gate Park.  Dissolving the Authority will allow the Garage and real property previously set aside for the Authority to return to the jurisdiction of the Recreation and Park Commission, so that the Recreation and Park Department may assume a greater role in managing the Garage in order to promote safety, accessibility, and mobility in the Park.  

(f) Upon dissolution of the Authority, Proposition J and the various references to the Authority that appear in the Municipal Code would be repealed.  Nevertheless, this ordinance does not diminish the core principles of Proposition J.  Rather, the People of the City and County of San Francisco reaffirm their commitment to those principles, namely, that (1) Golden Gate Park should be safe and accessible for all, scenically beautiful, environmentally sensitive, and culturally diverse; (2) the City should reduce the impact of automobiles in Golden Gate Park while still providing long-term assurance of safe, reliable, and convenient access for visitors to the Park, including visitors to its cultural institutions; (3) net Garage revenues in excess of what is needed for the Garage should be used for the operation, maintenance, improvement, or enhancement of Golden Gate Park; and (4) the City should not grant any free parking, discounts, or other preferences for parking in the Garage to any officials, commissioners, directors, or employees of the City or any of the institutions located in Golden Gate Park unless such preference is made available on the same terms to members of the public.

Section 2.  The Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998, the link to which appears at the Appendix at the end of the Administrative Code, is hereby amended by revising Section 7, to read as follows:

Section 7.  [Construction and Operation of the Underground Parking Facility; Concourse Surface Improvements]

The Authority shall construct or cause the Underground Parking Facility to be constructed with private funds.  It is intended that such funds be received by the Authority, on behalf of the City, as one or more philanthropic gifts.  No public funds shall be used in the construction of the Underground Parking Facility, except as follows.  The Authority may enter into agreements with the de Young Museum, Academy of Sciences, and/or the City and County, to coordinate the construction of the Underground Parking Facility with the construction projects relating to the facilities for those cultural institutions that may involve City funds, on such terms and conditions as the Authority and such affected parties may agree, if such coordination would result in cost savings to the City and County associated with such other projects.  In addition, the prohibition against the use of public funds to construct the Underground Parking Facility shall not be construed to prohibit the City from using public funds to acquire, operate, or subsidize public parking in the Underground Parking Facility. 

*  *  *  *

Section 3.  Dissolution of Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority; Jurisdictional Transfer to Recreation and Park Commission.

(a) The People of the City and County of San Francisco hereby direct the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority Board of Directors to take all actions necessary to dissolve the Authority pursuant to state law.  The General Manager of the Recreation and Park Department (the “General Manager”), or the General Manager’s designee, may assist with the dissolution process as the Authority and the General Manager deem appropriate.  

(b) Consistent with Section 3 of Proposition J, upon dissolution of the Authority, jurisdiction of the Garage and the real property previously set aside for the Authority in Resolution Nos. 715-98 and 737-03 shall transfer to the Recreation and Park Commission; and the Recreation and Park Department shall succeed to the role of the Authority as landlord under the Lease with the MCCP.  The General Manager may enter into any modifications or amendments to the Lease, including to any of its exhibits, that the General Manager determines, in consultation with the City Attorney, are necessary or advisable to memorialize the dissolution and jurisdictional transfer, and are in the best interests of the City, do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City, and are in compliance with all applicable laws, including the City’s Charter.  The Recreation and Park Department is also authorized to accept and expend all assets of the Authority that may remain after the Authority has paid or adequately provided for all of its debts, obligations, and liabilities pursuant to the dissolution process.

(c) Upon dissolution of the Authority, the General Manager shall notify the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the City Attorney of the dissolution, in writing.  The City Attorney shall then ensure that the Municipal Code incorporates the amendments specified in Sections 5, 6, and 7 of this ordinance. 

Section 4.  Repeal of The Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998.  Upon dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority pursuant to Section 3, the Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998 (“Proposition J”) shall be repealed in its entirety, by operation of this Section 4.  

Section 5.  Upon dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority pursuant to Section 3, Chapter 16, Article XV, of the Administrative Code shall be amended by revising Section 16.700, by operation of this Section 5, to read as follows:

SEC. 16.700.  PARTICIPATION.

   The following shall be eligible to participate in the Health Service System:

   *   *   *   *

    (c)   All members of the following boards and commissions during their time in service to the City and County of San Francisco:

      (1)   Access Appeals Commission

      (2)   Airport Commission

      (3)   Art Commission

      (4)   Asian Art Commission

      (5)   Board of Education

      (6)   Board of Appeals

      (7)   Building Inspection Commission

      (8)   Civil Service Commission

      (9)   Commission on the Aging

      (10)   Commission on the Environment

      (11)   Commission on the Status of Women

      (12)   Community College District Governing Board

      (13)   Concourse Authority

      (14)   Elections Commission

      (15)   Entertainment Commission

      (16)   Ethics Commission

      (17)   Fine Arts Museums Board of Trustees

      (18)   Fire Commission

      (19)   Film and Video Arts Commission

      (20)   First Five Commission

      (21)   Health Commission

      (22)   Health Service Board

      (23)   Human Rights Commission

      (24)   Human Services Commission

      (25)   Juvenile Probation Commission

      (26)   Law Library Board of Trustees

      (27)   Library Commission

      (28)   Municipal Transportation Authority

      (29)   Planning Commission

      (30)   Police Commission

      (31)   Port Commission

      (32)   Public Utilities Commission

      (33)   Recreation and Parks Commission

      (34)   Public Works Commission 

      (35)   Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board

      (36)   Retiree Health Care Trust Fund Board

      (37)   Retirement Board

      (38)   Sanitation and Streets Commission

      (39)   Sheriff’s Department Oversight Board

      (40)   Small Business Commission

      (41)   Sunshine Ordinance Task Force

      (42)   War Memorial and Performing Arts Center Board

      (43)   Youth Commission

   *   *   *   *

Section 6.  Upon dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority pursuant to Section 3, Article III, Chapter 1, of the Campaign and Government Conduct Code shall be amended by revising Section 3.1-103 and deleting 3.1-255, by operation of this Section 6, to read as follows:

SEC. 3.1-103.  FILING OFFICERS.

   Persons holding designated positions shall file the specified statements, declarations, and certificates with the filing officers designated in this Section.

   (a)   MEMBERS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.

      (1)   Members of the following boards and commissions shall file their Form 700 Statements of Economic Interests, Sunshine Ordinance Declarations, and Certificates of Ethics Training with the Ethics Commission:

*   *   *   *

          Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority Board of Directors

           *  *  *  *

   (b)   DEPARTMENT HEADS.

      (1)   The following department heads of City agencies shall file their Form 700 Statements of Economic Interests, Sunshine Ordinance Declarations, and Certificates of Ethics Training with the Ethics Commission:

*   *   *   *

           Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority, Chief Executive Officer

          *   *   *   *

SEC. 3.1-255.  GOLDEN GATE PARK CONCOURSE AUTHORITY.

Designated Positions

Disclosure Categories

Directors

1

Chief Executive Officer

1

Section 7.  Upon dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority pursuant to Section 3, the Park Code shall be amended by revising Sections 6.12 and 12.35, by operation of this Section 7, to read as follows:

SEC. 6.12.  GOLDEN GATE PARK ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM.

   *   *   *   *

   (e)   Disability Access Standards. The following disability access standards shall apply to the closures of John F. Kennedy Drive and related roads as set forth in subsection (b).

      (1)   Disability access to Golden Gate Park shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998.

      *  *  *  *

      (3)   The Department, in consultation with the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, Fine Arts Museums, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority, and Mayor’s Office on Disability, shall maintain at least the following disability access measures:

      *  *  *  *

SEC. 12.35. GOLDEN GATE PARK CONCOURSE UNDERGROUND PARKING FACILITY.

   (a)   The rates to be charged for parking in the Golden Gate Park Underground Parking Facility may be set by the SFMTA in accordance with Section 6.14. Until such time as the SFMTA has set rates with approval of the Recreation and Park Commission and the Board of Supervisors, the rates, which are subject to annual adjustment under Section 12.20, shall continue to apply:

Each hour

Maximum

Weekdays

$4.50

$25.00

Weekends

$5.00

$28.00

Flat Rate After 6:00 p.m.

$15.00

Monthly Rate (daytime)

$200.00

      (b)   The deposit and expenditure of all amounts collected from this facility are subject to the provisions of the “Golden Gate Park Revitalization Act of 1998,” Appendix 41 of the Administrative Code.

Section 8.  Effective and Operative Dates.

(a)  In accordance with Section 380 of the Municipal Election Code, the effective date of this ordinance shall be 10 days after the date the official vote count is declared by the Board of Supervisors.

(b)  Sections 1, 2, and 3(a) of this ordinance shall be operative on the effective date of the ordinance.

(c)  Sections 3(b), 3(c), 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this ordinance shall become operative upon dissolution of the Golden Gate Park Concourse Authority.

Section 9.  Scope of Ordinance.  In enacting this ordinance, the People of the City and County of San Francisco intend to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Municipal Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions or deletions, in accordance with the “Note” that appears under the official title of the ordinance.

*        *        *

  • 地方選票提案和論據的資料
    • 三藩市債務概覽
    • 名詞解釋
    • 提案 A: 退休人員補充生活費調整; 退休委員會與執行總監的合約
    • 提案 B: 工務局及委員會、衛生與街道局及委員會
    • 提案 C: 無家可歸者監督委員會
    • 提案 D: 可負擔房屋 — 創制提案請願書
    • 提案 E: 可負擔房屋 — 市議會
    • 提案 F: 圖書館保護基金
    • 提案 G: 學生成功基金 — 對三藩市聯合校區的撥款
    • 提案 H: 在偶數年舉行的市府選舉
    • 提案 I: 金門公園內甘迺迪大道(JFK Drive) 以及大公路(Great Highway)的車輛
    • 提案 J: 金門公園內甘迺迪大道(JFK Drive) 的休閒使用
    • 提案 K: 按三藩市高等法院命令, 提案K已在選票上移除。
    • 提案 L: 用於交通項目的銷售稅
    • 提案 M: 住宅單位的空置稅
    • 提案 N: 金門公園地下停車設施; 金門公園廣場管理委員會
    • 提案 O: 用於市立大學的額外地塊稅

關注我們!



© SF Department of Elections all rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

  • 一般信息
  • 候選人資料
  • 地方選票提案