Upang mapanatili ang serbisyo ng Caltrain at masuportahan ang pagbangon ng ekonomiya sa rehiyon, mapigilan ang kasikipan ng trapiko, magawang mas abot-kaya at mas madaling gamitin ang Caltrain, mabawasan ang polusyon sa hangin sa pamamagitan ng mas malilinis at mas tahimik na elektrik na tren, magawang mas mabilis ang pagbibiyahe, at maging mas madalas at mas malaki ang kapasidad ng Caltrain sa pagitan ng mga county ng Santa Clara, San Mateo at San Francisco, dapat bang pagtibayin ang resolusyon ng Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, na nagpapataw ng 30-taon na sales tax (buwis sa pagbebenta) na one-eighth (isa sa walong bahagi) na sentimo, nang may pangangasiwa at pag-o-audit, at nagkakaloob ng humigit-kumulang $100 milyon taon-taon para sa Caltrain na hindi na makukuha ng Estado?
WALANG-PINAPANIGANG PAGSUSURI NG ABUGADONG TAGAPAYO NG COUNTY SA PANUKALA RR
Nilagay ng Pinagsamang Mga Kapangyarihan na Lupon ng Peninsula Corridor (JPB o Caltrain) ang Panukala RR sa balota, na magpapahintulot sa mga pagtitinging transaksyon at buwis sa paggamit (buwis sa pagbebenta) na 0.125 porsiyento (isa't-kawalong sentimo) sa mga County ng Santa Clara at San Mateo at sa Lunsod at County ng San Francisco (pinagsama-samang "ang Mga County") sa loob ng tatlumpung (30) taon, na tinatayang magbibigay ng humigit-kumulang $100 milyon kada taon. Pinapahintulutan ang JPB na ilagay ang Panukala RR sa balota sa ilalim ng Seksyon 7286.65 ng Kodigo Sa Kita At Pagbubuwis ng California. Bago ang paglalagay sa balota, inaprubahan ng Lupon ng mga Superbisor ang pagsusumite ng panukala sa mga botante para sa tatlong County at ng mga namamahalang lupon ng Awtoridad sa Transportasyon ng Santa Clara Valley (VTA), Distrito ng Sasakyan ng Paghahatid ng County ng San Mateo (SamTrans), at Awtoridad sa Transportasyon ng Munisipal ng San Francisco (SFMTA).
Sa kasalukuyan, ang Caltrain ay pangunahing pinopondohan sa pamamagitan ng mga pamasahe ng pasahero. Nagmumula ang karagdagang pagpopondo para sa Caltrain sa mga kontribusyon ng miyembrong ahensiya mula sa VTA, SamTrans, at SFMTA. Ang nakasaad na layunin ng buwis sa pagbebenta ay para magtayo ng bago at nakalaang mapagkukunan ng kita para pondohan ang pagpapatakbo at pangkapital na gastusin ng serbisyo ng riles ng Caltrain, at wala ng iba pang layunin. Gaya ng nakasaad sa kumpletong teksto ng Panukala RR, ilalaan ang mga malilikom na buwis para sa mga sumusunod:
1. Para suportahan ang pagpapatakbo ng mga antas ng serbisyo ng Caltrain sa buong corridor mula sa San Francisco hanggang Gilroy;
2. Para suportahan ang pagpapalawig sa serbisyo sa abalang oras ng Caltrain mula sa anim na tren kada oras bawat direksyon hanggang walong tren kada oras bawat direksyon, pati na rin ang pagpapalawig sa serbisyo sa Gilroy hanggang sa hindi bababa sa limang tren sa umaga at limang tren sa hapon;
3. Para buuin at ipatupad ang mga programa para palawigin ang paggamit ng serbisyo ng Caltrain at padaliin ang paggamit sa sistema ng mga pasahero mula sa lahat ng antas ng kabuhayan;
4. Para makatulong na pahusayin ang iba pang lokal, panrehiyon, pang-estado, at pederal na pamumuhunan para isulong ang mga pangkapital na proyektong kinakailangan para ipatupad ang 2040 Pananaw sa Serbisyo ng Plano sa Negosyo ng Caltrain, na pinagtibay ng Caltrain noong Oktubre 3, 2019; at
5. Para pagkalooban ang Caltrain ng tuluy-tuloy na pondong susuporta sa mga taunang pangangailangan sa pagpapatakbo, pagpapanatili, at pangkapital ng de-kuryenteng serbisyo ng Caltrain na magiging mas madalas at mas maraming makakasakay.
Pangangasiwaan at kokolektahin ng Kagawaran ng Buwis at Pangangasiwa sa Bayarin ng California ang buwis. Susuriin ng independiyenteng komite ng mga nagbabantay na mamamayan ang pangangasiwa sa mga malilikom na buwis sa pagbebenta.
Ang botong "oo" ay isang boto para aprubahan ang isang buwis sa pagbebenta na 0.125% sa Mga County sa loob ng tatlumpung taon.
Ang botong "hindi" ay isang boto para hindi aprubahan ang buwis sa pagbebenta.
Kung may kahit dalawang-katlo ng lahat ng botanteng magpapatala ng balota ang boboto ng "oo" sa Panukala RR, aaprubahan ang buwis sa pagbebenta.
James R. Williams
Abugadong Tagapayo ng County, County ng Santa Clara
Mary E. Hanna-Weir
Kinatawang Abugadang Tagapayo ng County
Kung Paano Napunta sa Balota ang "RR”
Noong Agosto 6, 2020, inaprubahan ng Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Lupon ng mga Kinatawan mula sa mga Ahensiya ng Tatlong County ng Peninsula Corridor) ang resolusyon na naglalagay sa Proposisyon RR sa balota ng San Francisco County, San Mateo County, at Santa Clara County.
Pagkatapos nito, bumoto noong Agosto 7, 2020 ang Board of Supervisors (Lupon ng mga Superbisor) ng 11 sa 0 upang mailagay ang Proposisyon RR sa balota. Bumoto ang mga Superbisor nang ayon sa sumusunod:
Oo: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee.
Hindi: Wala.
Kailangan ng panukalang-batas na ito ng 66⅔% botong oo para maipasa.
Argumento ng May-Panukala na Pabor sa Panukalang RRArgumento na Pabor sa Panukalang Batas na RR
Bumoto ng Oo sa Panukalang-batas na RR upang maiwasan ang kasikipan sa trapiko at iligtas ang Caltrain, na napakahalagang lifeline o inaasahan sa buhay para sa ating Lungsod.
Ang Caltrain ay napakahalagang bahagi ng network ng transportasyon ng Bay Area, pero nasa panganib tayong mawala ito nang dahil sa COVID-19.
Hindi magtatagal nang habambuhay ang pandemyang ito at babalik ang trapiko. Isipin na lamang ninyo kung gaano kalala ang magiging sitwasyon kung walang Caltrain na nagpapanatili sa milyon-milyong kotse na wala sa ating mga kalye taon-taon.
Ililigtas ng Panukalang-batas RR ang Caltrain mula sa pagsasara, at paghuhusayin ang sistema, na magkakaloob ng mas mabibilis at mas madadalas na tren, mas mahuhusay na koneksiyon sa BART at sa Muni, libo-libong trabaho na magaganda ang suweldo, at malilinis at mas tahimik na mga tren upang mabawasan ang polusyon sa ingay at sa hangin.
Ipinapakita ng mga pag-aaral sa transportasyon na ang mga pagpapahusay na dahil sa Panukalang-batas RR ay makapaglalagay ng katumbas ng dalawang lane ng trapiko sa Caltrain sa halip na sa ating mga highway.
Titiyakin ng istriktong pagpapanagot sa pinansiya — kasama na ang pangangasiwa at taunang pampublikong pag-o-audit — na gagastusin ang bawat sentimo ng Panukalang-batas RR ayon sa naipangako. Ayon sa batas, kailangang suportahan ng lahat ng pondo ang sistema ng Caltrain sa loob ng mga county ng San Francisco, San Mateo, at Santa Clara — walang maaaring makuha ang Estado o maaaring magamit para sa anumang iba pang layunin.
Bumoto ng Oo sa RR — Iwasan ang Trapiko, Bawasan ang Polusyon, Iligtas ang Caltrain
• Iwasan ang kasikipan ng trapiko
• Gawing mas maluwag ang trapiko sa mga Highway 101 at 280
• Bawasan ang polusyon sa ingay at sa hangin sa pamamagitan ng mas malilinis at mas tahimik na mga electric na tren
• Lumikha ng mga lokal na trabaho
• Paghusayin ang mga koneksiyon ng Caltrain sa BART at sa Muni
• Gawin mas may equity o katarungan sa pagkakapantay-pantay ang mga pamasahe at magkaroon pang lalo ng diversity o pagkakaiba-iba ng mga sumasakay
• Bawasan ang panahon ng pagbibiyahe
• Lalo pang magkaroon ng kaligtasan para sa mga sumasakay at naglalakad
• Ihanda ang Caltrain sa pagpapalawak ng serbisyo tungo sa Downtown San Francisco
Habang bumabangon ang Bay Area mula sa pandemya at bumabalik ang mga tao sa trabaho, babalik din ang kasikipan ng trapiko. Tiyakin natin na hindi tayo mawawalan ng napakahalagang kailangan sa buhay at ng abot-kayang alternatibong transportasyon sa proseso. Bumoto ng Oo sa RR.
Dianne Feinstein, Senador ng Estados Unidos
London Breed, Mayor, Lungsod at County ng San Francisco
Shamann Walton, Caltrain Board of Directors (Lupon ng mga Direktor ng Caltrain) at San Francisco Board of Supervisors (Lupon ng mga Superbisor ng San Francisco)
Janice Li, BART Board of Directors (Lupon ng mga Direktor ng BART)
Dominique Monie, Kasamang Tagapangulo, San Francisco Transit Riders (Mga Sumasakay sa Transportasyon sa San Francisco)
Sagot sa Argumento ng May-Panukala na Pabor sa Panukalang RRSagot sa Argumento sa Balota bilang Pagsuporta sa Sales Tax (Buwis sa Pagbebenta) para sa Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CalTrain) — Proposisyon RR
TAMA NA, SOBRA NA!
Itataas ng Panukalang-batas RR ang porsiyento ng sales tax (buwis sa pagbebenta) nang mula 8.5 porsiyento tungo sa 8.625 porsiyento.
Maaaring hindi ito mukhang malaki, pero sa ganyang paraan nakakukuha ang mga gobyerno ng mas maraming pera mula sa karaniwang mga mamamayan: kaunti rito, kaunti roon, at hindi maglalaon, ay napakarami na.
Malala pa rito, regressive na buwis (kumukuha ng mas malaking porsiyento mula sa maliliit ang kita kaysa sa malalaki ang kita) ang sales tax. Gumagasta ang mga pamilyang mabababa ang kita ng mas mataas na porsiyento ng kanilang badyet sa mga bagay na pinapatawan ng sales tax kung ihahambing sa mga pamilyang matataas ang kita. Dahil dito, ang mga pamilyang mabababa ang kita ang siyang pinakamatatamaan ng pagtataas sa sales tax ng RR.
Partikular nang napinsala ang mga pamilyang mababa ang kita ng mga lockdown o hindi pagpapahintulot na lumabas sa bahay. Doble-dobleng suntok ang pagtataas ng sales tax na ito.
Ikinakatwiran ng mga may-panukala na “hindi magtatagal nang habambuhay ang pandemya.” Totoo iyan. Gayon pa man, totoo rin na tatagal ang pagtataas ng buwis na ito nang hanggang sa 30 taon.
Sa panahon ng pandemyang COVID-19, marami sa atin ang kinailangang maghigpit ng sinturon. Kailangang ganoon din ang gawin ng gobyerno. Kailangang magkasya ito sa malaki nang halaga ng pera na kinukuha na nito mula sa atin.
Huwag ninyong hayaan silang makakuha pa ng mas marami pa mula sa pera ninyo.
Panahon na para magsabi ng HINDI.
Padalhan sila ng mensahe.
Bumoto ng HINDI sa RR.
Eric Garris
Argumento ng Katunggali Laban sa Panukalang RRArgumento sa Balota Laban sa Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CalTrain) Sales Tax — Panukalang-batas RR
Napakagandang rekurso ng Caltrain. Gayon pa man, kasalukuyan nang lubhang napinsala ang ating mga lokal na komunidad sa pagsasara ng gobyerno ng ekonomiya nang dahil sa krisis na pandemyang Covid-19. Hindi na kaya pa ng mabababa at panggitna ang kita at ng mga walang trabaho na magdagdag ng isa na namang regressive sales tax sa panahong ito, lalo na ang iyong naka-iskedyul na tumakbo sa loob ng tatlumpung taon.
Nang dahil sa pandemya, nagkaroon na ng mga tanong tungkol sa kalusugan at kaligtasan sa pampublikong transportasyon sa pangkalahatan. Habang remote o mula sa malalayong lugar na nagtatrabaho ang mga manggagawa, na estado sa paggawa na malamang na magpatuloy sa nakikita nating hinaharap, talagang wala lang pangangailangan na pondohan ang mas maraming serbisyo ng Caltrain at magagastos na pag-a-upgrade o pagpapahusay.
Nawala na sa Caltrain ang mahigit sa 95% ng mga sumasakay dito sa panahon ng Covid-19. Bagamat maaaring makabalik ang mga sumasakay sa Caltrain sa pagdaan ng panahon, walang kabuluhan ang pagkolekta ng 30-taon na sales tax at ang paggasta ng malalaking halaga upang damihan pa ang serbisyo sa Caltrain, partikular na sa panahong nananatili pa rin ang sales tax na mayroon na tayo para sa transportasyon, at maaari nitong
pondohan ang Caltrain sa kasalukuyan at nakaraang mga antas ng serbisyo.
Pinopondohan ng naririyan nang transportation sales tax (buwis sa pagbebenta na nakalaan sa pampublikong transportasyon) ang tatlong ahensiya ng transportasyon ng mga county, ang Muni, VTA, at SAMTRANS, na siya namang nagbibigay ng subsidyo sa Caltrain sa pamamagitan ng $30 milyon/taon mula sa pondo ng mga nagbabayad ng buwis. Pahihintulutan ng pagpasa ng mungkahing sales tax na para sa Caltrain ang Muni, VTA, at SAMTRANS na mapanatiling hawak ang $30 milyon/taon para sa kani-kanilang sarili, sa halip na bigyan ng subsidyo ang Caltrain. Gayon pa man, ang mungkahing sales tax para sa Caltrain ay hindi lamang para palitan ang $30 milyon/taon na mga subsidyo, at sa halip, makakakalap ito ng $100 milyon/taon, na magneneto ng karagdagang $70 milyon/taon para sa Caltrain, at ng karagdagang $30 milyon para sa iba pang ahensiyang pantransportasyon. At heto ang panukala sa panahong pinakahindi kayang magbayad ng taumbayan ng buwis, at kung kailan maaaring mas mabawasan ang paggamit sa transportasyon.
Mangyaring bumoto ng hindi sa sales tax para sa Caltrain, na Panukalang-batas RR.
Para sa iba pang impormasyon, bisitahin ang: www.SVTaxpayers.org
Eric Garris
Sagot sa Argumento ng Katunggali Laban sa Panukalang RRSagot sa Argumento ng Katunggali Laban sa Proposisyon RR
Wala sa katwiran at walang impormasyon ang kaisa-isang katunggali na laban sa panukalang-batas RR, ngunit nagkakasundo kami sa isang mahalagang usapin: nawasak na ang ating mga komunidad ng COVID-19, at gayon din ang Caltrain at ang pampublikong transportasyon.
May mas mahusay pa tayong maggagawa kaysa sa pagbabalik lamang sa “dating normal” na walang-katapusang trapiko, mahahabang pagbibiyahe, at mas maraming polusyon.
Puwede tayong bumalik sa “bagong normal” na mas kaunting trapiko at mas malinis na hangin. Mahalaga ang RR sa pagtamo ng “bagong normal,” at sa paghahatid ng mga trabaho pabalik sa Bay Area.
Makatutulong sa atin ang panukalang-batas RR upang bumangon nang mas malakas kaysa sa dati:
Ang pagboto ng Oo sa RR ay magtatanggal sa libo-libong kotse mula sa mga highway araw-araw. Ipinapakita ng mga sarbey na babalik ang mga sumasakay sa pampublikong transportasyon. Kung wala ang Caltrain, mapipilitan silang magmaneho, kung kaya’t magiging mas malala pa ang trapiko kaysa sa panahong bago ang COVID-19.
Namumuhunan ang RR sa mas malinis, mas tahimik, at mas mabuti sa kapaligirang mga tren, kung kaya’t mababawasan ang polusyon sa ingay at sa hangin.
Pinoprotektahan ng RR ang Caltrain bilang abot-kaya at maaasahang pampublikong transportasyon. Libo-libong mahahalagang manggagawa — tulad ng mga nars, guro, at first responder — ang umaasa sa Caltrain araw-araw. Nararapat lamang sa kanilang magkaroon ng mabilis, hindi nagbabago-bago, at ligtas na transportasyon.
Titiyakin ng mga pangangasiwa at independiyenteng pag-o-audit ang pagiging bukas sa pagsisiyasat at pagpapanagot. Kailangang magbigay-suporta ang bawat sentimo sa mga pagsusumikap ng Caltrain na matanggal ang kasikipan ng trapiko at mabawasan ang polusyon.
Huwag magpabiktima sa mga taktika ng pananakot ng isang kritiko: Nagdaragdag lamang ang panukalang-batas RR ng isang sentimo sa binibiling $8 at hindi kasama sa buwis ang mahahalagang bagay na tulad ng groseriya at gamot. Maliit na halaga lamang iyan upang mabayaran ang pag-iwas sa kasikipan ng trapiko at mailigtas ang Caltrain.
Oo sa RR — Iligtas ang Caltrain, Bawasan ang Trapiko.
RescueCaltrain.org
David Chiu, Miyembro ng Asembleya ng Estado ng California*
Aaron Peskin, Superbisor ng San Francisco*
Sarah Cardona, Direktor ng Polisiya ukol sa Klima, Greenbelt Alliance*
Dominique Monie, Kasamang Tagapangulo, San Francisco Transit Riders
Fran Weld, Nakatataas na Bise Presidente, San Francisco Giants*
*Para lamang sa layunin ng identipikasyon; lumalagda ang awtor bilang indibidwal at hindi sa ngalan ng organisasyon.
Legal TextRESOLUTION NO. 2020 - 40
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA
* * *
IMPOSING A ONE-EIGHTH OF ONE PERCENT RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX TO BE USED FOR
OPERATING AND CAPITAL PURPOSES OF THE CALTRAIN RAIL SERVICE
WHEREAS, the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (hereinafter referred to as the “JPB”) is a joint exercise of powers authority duly formed pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Joint Exercise of Powers Act”) and the joint powers agreement by and between the City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”), the San Mateo County Transit District (“SMCTD”), and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (“VTA”), restated and dated October 3, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the JPB operates passenger rail service between San Francisco, California and Gilroy, California currently serving 32 stations along the 77-mile corridor, operating approximately 90 weekday trains, which include express, limited, and local trains (“Caltrain rail service”); and
WHEREAS, effective January 1, 2018, Part 1.7 (commencing with Section 7286.65) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California was amended by California Senate Bill No. 797 to authorize the JPB to submit to the voters of the City and County of San Francisco, and the Counties of San Mateo and Santa Clara (together, the “Counties”), a regional measure proposing to impose a retail transactions and use tax of not more than 0.125 percent to be used for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service; and
WHEREAS, the measure may only be submitted to the voters upon (a) a two-thirds vote of the JPB Board of Directors, (b) approval of the Boards of Supervisors of the Counties, and (c) approval of the governing boards of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, SMCTD, and VTA; and
WHEREAS, the JPB has proposed approval of this Resolution that has as its special purpose to authorize the JPB to impose a one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) retail transactions and use tax for a period of thirty (30) years, throughout the three Counties, to fund operating and capital expenses of the Caltrain rail service, and to support the operating and capital needs required to implement the Service Vision adopted by the JPB on October 3, 2019 as part of the Caltrain Business Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
Section 1. Title; Summary
This Resolution shall be known as the “2020 Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board Retail Transactions and Use Tax Resolution” and may also be referred to herein as the “Resolution.”
This Resolution imposes a retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) within the City and County of San Francisco, and the Counties of San Mateo and Santa Clara (together, the “Counties”) to be operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing not less than 110 days after the adoption of this Resolution by the voters, the authority to levy such tax to remain in effect for thirty (30) years, for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service.
The JPB or a successor agency, if any, will administer proceeds of the retail transactions and use tax imposed by this Resolution (“2020 Sales Tax”).
The JPB shall develop guidelines to administer the tax proceeds received from the enactment of the retail transactions and use tax, and shall allocate the tax proceeds to the operating and capital expenses of the Caltrain rail service. Administration of the 2020 Sales Tax proceeds will be subject to review by an independent citizens’ oversight committee to verify compliance with the purpose of the tax.
The provisions in this Resolution shall apply solely to the retail transactions and use tax adopted pursuant to this Resolution. Nothing in this Resolution is intended to modify, repeal or alter any resolutions previously adopted by the JPB.
Section 2. Definitions.
“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board or its successor agency.
“Boards of Supervisors” means the Boards of Supervisors in each of the Counties.
“Caltrain” means the passenger rail service on the rail line operated by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (or its successor agency) between Gilroy and San Francisco.
“CCSF” means the City and County of San Francisco
“Counties” means the City and County of San Francisco and the Counties of San Mateo and Santa Clara. The singular term “County” may also be used to mean any of the Counties.
“Department of Tax and Fee Administration” means the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration or any successor thereto.
“Government Code” means the Government Code of the State of California, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“Member Agencies of the JPB” means CCSF, SMCTD and VTA.
“Operative Date” means the date determined as described in Section 5 herein, July 1, 2021.
“JPB” means the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (or its successor agency).
“Public Utilities Code” means the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“Revenue and Taxation Code” means the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“Sales and Use Tax Law” means Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 6001 thereof, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“SMCTD” means the San Mateo County Transit District.
“Tax Proceeds” means amounts received by the JPB from the Department of Tax and Fee Administration from the imposition of the 2020 Sales Tax imposed pursuant to this Resolution.
“Tax” or “2020 Sales Tax” means the one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) retail transactions and use tax imposed by this Resolution upon approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the electors voting on the ballot measure set forth in Section 16 hereof, to be used for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service.
“Transactions and Use Tax Law” means Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 7251 thereof, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“Vehicle Code” means the Vehicle Code of the State of California, as amended and supplemented from time to time pursuant to its terms.
“VTA” means the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
Section 3. Findings.
The Board hereby finds and determines that the recitals set forth above and incorporated herein by reference are true and correct. In addition, the Board hereby finds:
The JPB is facing significant and ever increasing structural funding shortfalls which impact its ability to meet its operational needs, address its state of good repair requirements and undertake necessary capital improvements to sustain the Caltrain service.
Since its inception pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement by and between CCSF, SMCTD, and VTA, dated October 3, 1996, the JPB has had no dedicated source of funding other than passenger fares. Instead, the JPB relies on contributions from its Member Agencies to fulfill minimum financial requirements in its operating and capital budgets under two different funding formulas. For capital costs, each of the Member Agencies contributes an equal amount of capital funding each year. The Member Agencies also supplement operating funding based on the percentage of system ridership originating in each County. The levels of both capital and operating funding are determined by the funding capacity of the Member Agency with the least ability to provide its share of funding in any given year, and the amount that Member Agency can make available then becomes the standard against which the contributions of the other Member Agencies are calculated. This approach fosters an uncertain financial and planning environment for the JPB.
In an environment of continual escalation in operating, maintenance and repair costs, the JPB does not have the capacity to operate service levels that meet the rising passenger demands for Caltrain service.
The JPB’s farebox recovery rate of over 70%, which reflects the proportion of operating costs funded by passenger fares, exceeds all other rail commute services nationwide.
The Caltrain service is the seventh largest commuter rail service in the nation and it operates the most efficient such service based on costs per passenger mile.
To provide a means to address the JPB’s financial challenges, in 2017 the Governor signed Senate Bill No. 797, introduced by Senator Jerry Hill, authorizing the JPB to implement a new retail transactions and use tax of up to 0.125 percent if (i) the Board of Directors of the JPB adopts, by a two-thirds vote, a resolution submitting the measure to the voters, (ii) the measure is approved by the Boards of Supervisors of each of the Counties, (iii) the measure is approved by the governing boards of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, the SMCTD, and VTA, and (iv) the tax is adopted by a two-thirds vote of the Counties’ voters.
The JPB has embarked upon a project to electrify its right of way between San Francisco and San Jose which will transform the Caltrain service into a more environmentally sustainable, quiet and nimble operation commencing in 2022.
Although the electrified Caltrain service will eliminate the costs of diesel fuel, Caltrain will confront new system and technological costs for operation and maintenance of the electrified system, the electrical multiple unit rail cars, and the positive train control system.
The revenues derived from the 0.125 percent sales tax in the Counties is forecast to be sufficient to cover the operational needs of the Caltrain rail service, which, in turn, will reduce the pressure on the JPB to continually raise passenger fares and will reduce the need for the Member Agencies to contribute funding for operations.
Approval of this Resolution will place before the voters of the three Counties the opportunity to provide the JPB with a steady stream of funding to support the annual operating and maintenance needs of an electrified Caltrain service with increased frequency and capacity, which in turn will reduce traffic congestion and air pollution in the three Counties.
Section 4. Imposition of Retail Transactions and Use Tax; Special Purpose; Use of Proceeds.
Subject to the limits imposed by this Resolution and the provisions of Section 7286.65 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which took effect January 1, 2018, the JPB hereby imposes, in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the City and County of San Francisco County, County of San Mateo, and County of Santa Clara, an additional retail transactions and use tax at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%), such tax (i) to be imposed beginning on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing not less than 110 days after the approval of the retail transactions and use tax by the electors voting on the ballot measure set forth in Section 17 hereof, (ii) to remain in effect for a period of thirty (30) years, and (iii) to be for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service.
More specifically, this Resolution, if adopted, should be interpreted so as to:
impose a new one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) retail transactions and use tax in accordance with the provisions of Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and consistent with Article XIII C of the California Constitution;
set a maximum term of thirty (30) years during which time the retail transactions and use tax shall be imposed;
incorporate provisions identical to those of the Sales and Use Tax Law insofar as those provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements and limitations contained in Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code;
establish that the retail transactions and use tax be administered and collected by the Department of Tax and Fee Administration in a manner that adapts itself as fully as practicable to, and requires the least possible deviation from, the existing statutory and administrative procedures followed by the Department of Tax and Fee Administration in administering and collecting state transactions and use taxes as such terms are defined in the Sales and Use Tax Law;
authorize the administration of the retail transactions and use tax in a manner that will, to the degree possible, be consistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, minimize the cost of collecting the retail transactions and use taxes and at the same time minimize the burden of record keeping upon persons subject to taxation under the provisions of this Resolution;
require that proceeds of the Tax imposed by this Resolution be for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service and that the tax revenues from this measure will be prioritized:
To support the operation of Caltrain service levels throughout the corridor from San Francisco to Gilroy, including, but not limited to, expanded service and increased capacity realized through the operation of an electrified system. The required support includes the maintenance of equipment, infrastructure and systems necessary to sustain and expand the service;
To support the infrastructure, rolling stock, and capital projects necessary to advance the expansion of the Caltrain peak hour service from six trains per hour per direction to eight trains per hour per direction, as well as the expansion of the Gilroy service to a minimum of five morning and five afternoon trains;
To develop and implement programs to expand access to the Caltrain service and facilitate use of the system by passengers of all income levels, including establishing an affordability program with consideration of discounted passes and/or additional means-based fare discounts informed by Caltrain’s participation in the regional Means Based Fare Pilot Program;
To help leverage other local, regional, state and federal investments to advance capital projects necessary to implement the Caltrain Business Plan’s 2040 Service Vision, adopted by the JPB on October 3, 2019, including, but not limited to: the San Francisco Downtown Extension project including the Pennsylvania Avenue alignment, the extension of electrified train service to Gilroy, and grade separations throughout the Caltrain rail corridor; and
To provide the JPB with a steady stream of funding to support the annual operating, maintenance and capital needs of an electrified Caltrain service with increased frequency and capacity, which in turn will reduce traffic congestion and air pollution in the Counties; and
authorize the issuance, from time to time, of limited tax bonds to finance transportation improvements consistent with the purpose of the Tax and applicable law.
Section 5. Applicability; Effective Date; Operative Date and Period of Tax Imposition, Termination Date.
This Resolution shall be applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the Counties.
The Resolution will become effective at the close of the polls on the day of election at which the ballot measure set forth in Section 16 of this Resolution is adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the electors voting on such ballot measure at such election.
Pursuant to Section 7265 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, this Resolution shall be operative on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing not less than 110 days after the adoption of the Resolution, July 1, 2021.
The maximum period during which the 2020 Sales Tax will be imposed is thirty (30) years, terminating June 30, 2051.
Section 6. Administration of the 2020 Sales Tax Proceeds
Responsibility for Administration and Implementation. The JPB or a successor agency, if any, will administer the 2020 Sales Tax Proceeds.
Restrictions on the Use of Tax Proceeds. Tax Proceeds must be spent for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service.
Environmental Review. Environmental reporting, review, and approval procedures as provided under the National Environmental Policy Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, or other applicable laws will be adhered to as a prerequisite to implementation of any project funded with Tax Proceeds.
Independent Citizens Oversight; Audits. Administration of the Tax Proceeds will be subject to review by the nine-member JPB Citizens Advisory Committee, or a similar successor independent citizens oversight body, to verify that Tax Proceeds are invested in a way that is consistent with the purpose of the Tax. Annually, the JPB shall have an audit conducted by an independent auditor. The auditor shall review the receipt of Tax Proceeds and expenditure of Tax Proceeds. The JPB independent Citizens Advisory Committee shall receive the audit findings report, hold a public hearing and issue a report annually to provide the public with information regarding how Tax Proceeds are being spent. The hearing will be held at a public meeting subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act.
Section 7. Contract with the State.
Prior to the Operative Date, as provided in the Revenue and Tax Code, the JPB will contract with the Department of Tax and Fee Administration to perform all functions incident to the administration and operation of this Resolution and the 2020 Sales Tax; provided that, if the JPB shall not have contracted with the Department of Tax and Fee Administration prior to the Operative Date of this Resolution, the JPB shall nevertheless so contract and in such case, the Operative Date of this Resolution shall be the first day of the first calendar quarter following the execution of such a contract and references herein to June 30, 2051 shall be extended to permit collection of the 2020 Sales Tax for up to thirty (30) years.
Section 8. Transactions and Use Tax Rate of One-Eighth of One Percent; Excise Tax Rate of One-Eighth of One Percent
Transactions Tax Rate. For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail, a tax is hereby imposed upon all retailers in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of San Francisco County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) of the gross receipts of any retailer from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in the Counties on and after July 1, 2021. This tax shall be imposed for a maximum period of thirty (30) years.
Use Tax Rate. An excise tax is hereby imposed on the storage, use, or other consumption in San Francisco County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer on and after July 1, 2021 for storage, use, or other consumption in the Counties at the rate of one-eighth of one percent (0.125%) of the sales price of the property. This tax shall be imposed for a maximum period of thirty (30) years.
Section 9. Place of Sale.
For the purposes of this Resolution, all retail sales are consummated at the place of business of the retailer unless the tangible personal property sold is delivered by the retailer to an out-of-state destination or to a common carrier for delivery to an out-of- state destination. The gross receipts from such sales shall include delivery charges, when such charges are subject to state sales and use tax, regardless of the place to which delivery is made. In the event a retailer has no permanent place of business in the state or has more than one place of business, the place or places at which the retail sales are consummated shall be determined under rules and regulations to be prescribed and adopted by the Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
Section 10. Adoption of Provisions of State Revenue and Taxation Code.
Except as otherwise provided in this Resolution and except insofar as they are inconsistent with the provisions of Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all of the provisions of Part 1 (commencing with Section 6001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code are hereby adopted and made part of this Resolution as though fully set forth herein.
Section 11. Limitations on Adoption of State Law and Collection of Use Taxes.
In adopting the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, wherever the State of California is named or referred to as the taxing agency, the name of the JPB shall be substituted therefor. The substitution, however, shall not be made: (i) when the word “State” is used as part of the title of the State Controller, the State Treasurer, the State Board of Control, the Department of Tax and Fee Administration, State Treasury, or the Constitution of the State of California; (ii) when the result of that substitution would require action to be taken by or against the JPB or any agent, officer, or employee thereof rather than by or against the Department of Tax and Fee Administration, in performing the functions incident to the administration or operation of this Resolution; (iii) in those sections, including but not necessarily limited to, sections referring to the exterior boundaries of the State of California, where the result of the substitution would be to (a) provide an exemption from the 2020 Sales Tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not otherwise be exempt from the 2020 Sales Tax while such sales, storage, use, or other consumption remains subject to tax by the State of California under the provisions of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or (b) impose the 2020 Sales Tax with respect to certain sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property which would not be subject to tax by the State of California under said provisions of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and (iv) in Sections 6701, 6702 (except in the last sentence thereof), 6711, 6715, 6737, 6797, or 6828 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The names of “San Francisco County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County” shall be substituted for the word “state” in the phrase “retailer engaged in business in this state” in Section 6203 and in the definition of that phrase in Section 6203.
Section 12. Permit Not Required.
If a seller’s permit has been issued to a retailer under Section 6067 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, an additional transactor’s permit shall not be required by this Resolution.
Section 13. Exemptions, Exclusions, and Credits.
There shall be excluded from the measure of the 2020 Sales Tax the amount of any transactions and use tax imposed by the State of California or by any city, city and county, or county pursuant to the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law or the amount of any state-administered transactions and use tax.
There are exempted from the computation of the amount of transactions tax portion of the 2020 Sales Tax gross receipts derived from:
Sales of tangible personal property, other than fuel or petroleum products, to operators of aircraft to be used or consumed principally outside the County in which the sale is made and directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property under the authority of the laws of the State of California, the United States, or any foreign government.
Sales of property to be used outside the Counties which is shipped to a point outside the Counties, pursuant to the contract of sale, by delivery to such point by a retailer or his agent, or by delivery by the retailer to a carrier for shipment to a cosignee at such point. For the purposes of this subsection, delivery to a point outside the Counties shall be satisfied;
with respect to vehicles (other than commercial vehicles) subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, and undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Code by registration to an out-of- Counties address and by a declaration under penalty of perjury, signed by the buyer, stating that such address is, in fact, his or her principal place of residence; and
with respect to commercial vehicles, by registration to a place of business out-of-Counties, and a declaration under penalty of perjury, singed by the buyer, that the vehicle will be operated from that address.
Sale of tangible personal property if the seller is obligated to furnish the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the Operative Date of this Resolution; and
A lease of tangible personal property which is a continuing sale of such property for any period of time for which the lessor is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by the lease prior to the Operative Date of this Resolution.
For the purposes of numbered sections 3 and 4 of this Section 13(b), the sale or lease of tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time for which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised.
There are exempted from the use tax imposed by this Resolution, the storage, use or other consumption in the Counties of tangible personal property:
The gross receipts from the sale of which have been subject to a transactions tax under any state-administered transactions and use tax ordinance;
Other than fuel or petroleum products purchased by operators of aircraft and used or consumed by such operators directly and exclusively in the use of such aircraft as common carriers of persons or property for hire or compensation under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued pursuant to the laws of the State of California, the United States, or any foreign government. This exemption is in addition to the exemptions provided in Section 6366 and 6366.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California;
If the purchaser is obligated to purchase the property for a fixed price pursuant to a contract entered into prior to the Operative Date of this Resolution; and
If the possession of, or the exercise of any right or power over, the tangible personal property arises under a lease which is a continuing purchase of such property for any period of time for which the lessee is obligated to lease the property for an amount fixed by a lease prior to the Operative Date of this Resolution.
For the purposes of numbered sections 3 and 4 of this Section 13(c), above, storage, use, or other consumption, or possession, or exercise of any right or power over, tangible personal property shall be deemed not to be obligated pursuant to a contract or lease for any period of time during which any party to the contract or lease has the unconditional right to terminate the contract or lease upon notice, whether or not such right is exercised.
Except as provided in numbered section 7 of this Section 13(c), below, a retailer engaged in business in the County or Counties shall not be required to collect use tax from the purchaser of tangible personal property, unless the retailer ships or delivers the property into the County or Counties or participates within the County or Counties in making the sale of the property, including, but not limited to, soliciting or receiving the order, either directly or indirectly, at a place of business of the retailer in the County or Counties or through any representative, agency, canvasser, solicitor, subsidiary or person in the County or Counties under the authority of the retailer.
“A retailer engaged in business in the Counties” shall also include any retailer of any of the following: vehicles subject to registration pursuant to Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 3 of the Vehicle Code, aircraft licensed in compliance with Section 21411 of the Public Utilities Code, or undocumented vessels registered under Division 3.5 (commencing with Section 9840) of the Vehicle Code. That retailer shall be required to collect use tax from any purchaser who registers or licenses the vehicle, vessel, or aircraft at an address in any of the Counties.
“A retailer engaged in business in the Counties” shall also include any retailer that, in the preceding calendar year or the current calendar year, has total combined sales of tangible personal property in this state or for delivery in the state by the retailer and all persons related to the retailer that exceeds five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000). For purposes of this section, a person is related to another person if both persons are related to each other pursuant to Section 267(b) of Title 26 of the United Stated Code and regulations thereunder.
Any person subject to use tax under this Resolution may credit against that tax any transactions or reimbursement for transaction tax paid to a district imposing, or retailer liable for a transaction tax pursuant to Chapter 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code with respect to the sale to the person of the property, the storage, use or other consumption of which is subject to the use tax.
Section 14. Revenue and Taxation Code Amendments.
All amendments to Part 1 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to sales and use taxes and which are not inconsistent with Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and all amendments to Part 1.6 and Part 1.7 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, enacted subsequent to the effective date of this Resolution as described in Section 5 hereof, shall automatically become part of this Resolution; provided, however, that no such amendment shall operate so as to affect the rate of tax imposed by this Resolution.
Section 15. Issuance of Bonds.
From time to time, pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, the JPB is authorized to issue limited tax bonds payable from, and secured by a pledge of, Tax Proceeds for the operating and capital purposes of the Caltrain rail service.
Maximum bonded indebtedness which may be outstanding at any one time may not exceed the estimated proceeds of the 2020 Sales Tax as determined by the JPB.
Nothing herein shall limit or restrict in any way the power and authority of the JPB to issue bonds, notes or other obligations, to enter into loan agreements, leases, reimbursement agreements, standby bond purchase agreements, interest rate swap agreements or other derivative contracts or to engage in any other transaction under the Public Utilities Code, the Government Code or any other applicable law.
Section 16. Ballot Measure.
There shall be proposed to the voters of San Francisco County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County the following proposition:
“To preserve Caltrain service and support regional economic recovery, prevent traffic congestion, make Caltrain more affordable and accessible, reduce air pollution with cleaner and quieter electric trains, make travel times faster, and increase Caltrain frequency and capacity between Santa Clara, San Mateo and San Francisco counties, shall the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board’s resolution levying a 30-year one-eighth cent sales tax with oversight and audits, providing approximately $100 million annually for Caltrain that the State cannot take away, be adopted?”
Section 17. Enjoining Collection Forbidden.
No injunction or writ of mandate or other legal or equitable process shall issue in any suit, action, or proceeding against the State of California or the JPB, or against any officer of the State of California or the JPB, to prevent or enjoin the collection of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected under this Resolution or under Part 1.6 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.
Section 18. Severability.
If any provision of this Resolution or the application of this Resolution to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other provisions or actions taken to implement the Resolution, which are otherwise lawful, shall remain in full force and effect.