Jump to navigation

  • Patnubay ng site
  • Laki ng letra
  • Text only
Mobile menu button
San Francisco Voter Guide logo
Online EdisyonPamplet ng Impormasyon Para sa Botante & Halimbawang BalotaPinagsamang Pambuong-Estado na Tuwirang Primaryang Eleksyon
Hunyo 7, 2022

Elections and accessibility

  • sfelections.org
  • Kadaliang Magamit
  • English
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Filipino
  • Pangkalahatang Impormasyon
    • Mabilisang Gabay para sa Hunyo 7, 2022 na Eleksyon
      • May mga Tanong ba Kayo?
      • Sulat mula sa Direktor
      • Pangkalahatang Buod ukol sa Opisyal na mga Mapagkukunan ng Impormasyon ng Botante
      • Ang Ballot Simplification Committee
      • Elections Commission (Komisyon para sa mga Eleksyon)
      • Mga Bagong Linya ng mga Pinagbobotohang Distrito para sa 2022
      • Mga Opsiyon sa Pagboto
      • Mapa at Lokasyon ng mga Opisyal na Kahon na Hulugan ng Balota sa San Francisco
      • Batas sa mga Karapatan Ng Botante
      • Accessible na Pagboto at mga Serbisyo
      • Matutulungan namin kayo: Tulong sa wikang Filipino
      • Libreng mga Klase sa Ingles
      • hide
      • Balota para sa Hunyo 7, 2022 na Eleksyon
      • Pagmamarka sa Inyong Balota
      • Mga Madalas Itanong ukol sa Pagpaparehistro at Pagboto sa San Francisco
      • Impormasyon Ukol sa mga Ipinagbabawal na Gawain sa Eleksyon
      • Mga Pangunahing Kaalaman tungkol sa Sistema ng Pagboto sa Lungsod
      • Panatilihing Napapanahon ang Impormasyon sa Inyong Rehistrasyon bilang Botante!
      • Impormasyon ukol sa Pagkapribado ng inyong Rehistrasyon bilang Botante
      • Safe at Home Program (Programang Ligtas sa Tahanan)
      • Mahalagang Paalala!
      • Itigil na ang pagtanggap ng inyong nakalimbag na Voter Information Pamphlet (Pamplet na Nagbibigay ng Impormasyon sa Botante)
      • Magboluntaryo! Maging isang Poll Worker!
      • Hanapin ang Kinaroroonan ng inyong Botohan at ang Halimbawang Balota Ninyo
      • XML Streams
      • Site Guide
  • Impormasyon tungkol sa Kandidato
    • Impormasyon ng Kandidato
      • Mga Limit sa Boluntaryong Gastos
      • Mga Pag-Endoso ng Partido sa mga Kandidato
      • Katungkulan sa Lungsod at County ng San Francisco na Pagbobotohan sa Eleksyong Ito
      • Primaryang Eleksyon ng California
      • Mga Pahayag ng Inyong mga Kandidato
      All Candidate Statements
      所有候選人聲明
      Todas las declaraciones de las candidatos
      Lahat ng mga Pahayag ng mga Kandidato
    • Mga Kandidato para sa Representative (Kinatawan) ng Estados Unidos, Distrito 11
    • Mga Kandidato para sa Representative (Kinatawan) ng Estados Unidos, Distrito 15
    • Mga Kandidato para sa Asembleya ng Estado, Distrito 17
    • Mga Kandidato para sa Asembleya ng Estado, Distrito 19
    • Mga Kandidato para sa Abugado ng Lungsod
  • Mga Lokal na Panukalang-batas sa Balota
    • Impormasyon tungkol sa mga Lokal na Panukalang-batas na nasa Balota at mga Argumento
      • Pangkalahatang Buod ng Utang ng San Francisco
      • Mga Salitang Dapat Ninyong Malaman
      • Proposisyon A: Bond (utang ng gobyerno) para sa Pagiging Maaasahan ng Muni at Kaligtasan sa mga Kalye
      • Proposisyon B: Building Inspection Commission (Komisyon sa Pag-iinspeksiyon ng mga Gusali)
      • Proposisyon C: Iskedyul ng mga Gawain para sa Recall (Pagpapaalis sa Katungkulan) at Pagtatalaga para sa Nabakanteng mga Katungkulan
      • Proposisyon D: Office of Victim and Witness Rights (Opisina para sa mga Karapatan ng mga Biktima at Saksi); Serbisyo Legal para sa mga Biktima ng Karahasan sa Tahanan
      • Proposisyon E: Behested Payments (Perang Hinihiling ng Pampublikong Opisyal para sa Layuning Lehislatibo, para sa Gobyerno, o Pangkawanggawa)
      • Proposisyon F: Pangongolekta at Pagtatapon sa Basura
      • Proposisyon G: Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan
      • Proposisyon H: Panukala ukol sa Recall (Pagpapaalis sa Katungkulan) ni Chesa Boudin

You are here

  1. Bahay ›
  2. Mga Lokal na Panukalang-batas sa Balota ›
G
Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan

Dapat bang itakda ng Lungsod sa mga taga-empleyo na mayroong mahigit sa 100 empleyado sa buong mundo na magkaloob ng may bayad na pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan, kung saan hindi lalampas ang pagliban sa 80 oras sa isang taon, para sa kanilang mga empleyado na nasa San Francisco? 

Buod ng Ballot Simplification Committee (Komite para Gawing mas Simple ang Balota) 

Kung Ano Ito Ngayon: Sa pangkalahatan, itinatakda ng Lungsod sa mga taga-empleyo na pagkalooban ang mga empleyado ng may bayad na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit, batay sa bilang ng mga oras na nakapagtrabaho sa San Francisco. Nagkakaloob din ang Lungsod sa mga empleyado nito ng may bayad na pagli­ban nang dahil sa sakit. 

Walang batas ang Lungsod na tumutugon sa may bayad na pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. 

Ang Mungkahi: Simula sa Oktubre 1, 2022, sa pangkalahatan ay itatakda ng Proposisyon G sa pribadong mga taga-empleyo at sa Lungsod na magkaloob ng may bayad na pagliban sa mga empleyado tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. Ipatutupad ang itinatakdang ito sa pribadong mga taga-em­pleyo na may mahigit sa 100 empleyado sa buong mundo, at sasakupin lamang ang mga empleyadong nagtatrabaho sa San Francisco. Ang dami ng pagliban na ipagkakaloob kada taon ay magiging katumbas ng bilang ng oras na regular na nagtatra­baho ang bawat empleyado sa loob ng dalawang linggo, nang hanggang sa pinakamarami nang bilang na 80 oras. Maaari lamang gamitin ang pagliban na ito sa panahon ng emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. 

Kasama sa emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan ang: 

• lokal o pang-estadong emergency sa kalusugan kaugnay ng anumang nakahahawang sakit, na idineklara ng opisyal sa kalusugan ng lokal na gobyerno o ng estado; o 

• panahon na nagpapatupad ng Spare the Air Alert (Pag-alerta nang Dahil sa Hangin na Masama sa Kalusugan). 

Maaaring magamit ng mga empleyado ang pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan sa ilang pagkakataon, kasama na kung: 

• hindi makapagtrabaho ang empleyado o ang miyembro ng kanyang pamilya nang dahil sa mga rekomendasyon o itinatakda ng kautusan sa kalusugan na tumutugon sa emergency; 

• nakararanas ang empleyado o ang miyembro ng kanyang pamilya ng mga sintomas ng sakit na lumikha ng emergency, o na-test na positibo sa sakit; o 

• pangunahing nagtatrabaho ang empleyado sa labas ng gusali at may sakit sa puso o baga, may problema sa paghinga, buntis, o 60 taong gulang o higit pa, kapag ipinatutupad ang Spare the Air Alert. 

Maaaring piliin ng empleyado na gamitin ang pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan, o ang may bayad na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit, sa mga pagkakataon na maaa­ring ipatupad ang dalawang ito. Hindi naililipat sa susunod na taon ang anumang hindi pa nagagamit na pagliban nang dahil sa emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. 

Ang Ibig Sabihin ng Botong “OO”: Kapag bumoto kayo ng “oo,” gusto ninyong itakda sa pribadong mga taga-empleyo, na mayroong mahigit sa 100 empleyado sa buong mundo, at sa Lungsod, na magkaloob ng may bayad na pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan, kung saan hindi lalam­pas ang pagliban sa 80 oras sa isang taon, para sa kanilang mga empleyado na nasa San Francisco. 

Ang Ibig Sabihin ng Botong “HINDI”: Kapag bumoto kayo ng “hindi,” ayaw ninyong itakda ang bagong may bayad na pagli­ban na ito tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. 

Pahayag ng Controller (Tagapamahala ng Pinansiya) Tungkol sa "G" 

Naglabas na ang Controller ng Lungsod na si Ben Rosenfield ng sumusunod na pahayag tungkol sa magiging epekto sa pinan­siya ng Proposisyon G:

Sa aking opinyon, kapag inaprubahan ang mungkahing ordi­nansa ng mga botante, magkakaroon ito ng kakaunti hanggang sa malaking pagtaas ng gastos ng gobyerno.

Itatakda ng mungkahing ordinansa sa mga taga-empleyo na may mahigit sa 100 empleyado sa buong mundo na magkaloob ng pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan sa mga empleyadong nagtatrabaho sa San Francisco sa pana­hon ng emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan, kasama na ang emergency sa kalidad ng hangin. Maaaring gamitin ng mga empleyado ang pagliban na ito para sa natukoy nang mga layu­nin. Magkakaloob ang mga taga-empleyo ng hanggang sa 80 oras ng may bayad na pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pam­publikong kalusugan, batay sa bilang ng regular na oras ng pagtatrabaho ng empleyado. Bilang pagtugon sa pandemyang COVID-19, itinakda ng pederal, pang-estado, at lokal na mga batas sa mga taga-empleyo, na may espesipikong laki ng kom­panya, na magkaloob ng may bayad na pang-emergency na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit. Pinagtitibay ng mungkahing ordi­nansa ang mga itinatakda na katulad nito, pero hindi nito inaamyendahan ang kasalukuyang batas. 

Kasama sa gastos ng gobyerno ng lungsod ang mga gawain para sa pagpapatupad at pagtitiyak ng pagsunod ng pribadong mga taga-empleyo, kasama na ang isa o higit pang posisyon ng compliance officer (opisyal para matiyak ang pagsunod sa batas) na may gastos na $170,000 kada taon. Mas mahirap ang pagtataya ng gastos ng Lungsod nang dahil sa kautusang ito ukol sa may bayad na pagliban sa mga taon sa hinaharap. Ang benepisyo ng may bayad na pagliban dahil sa sakit na COVID-19 nang hanggang sa 80 oras, na ibinibigay sa bawat kawani ng lungsod tuwing may emergency, ay karaniwan nang hindi itinu­turing na dagdag na bayad. Ang mga empleyado ay mayroon ding mga balanse sa regular na may bayad na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit na posible nilang magamit. Maaaring magkaroon ng malaking epekto sa pinansiya ng Lungsod ang pagpapahaba ng panahon ng pagpapatupad ng benepisyo sa pagliban tuwing may emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan. Ibubunsod ang epektong ito ng laki ng halaga para sa bayad sa overtime upang mapunan ang indi-indibidwal na pagliban. Noong nakaraang panahon, maliit na bahagi lamang ito ng aktuwal na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit, pero mahirap maging tiyak sa panghuhula nito. 

Kung Paano Napunta sa Balota ang "G" 

Noong Marso 1, 2022, bumoto ang Board of Supervisors ng 11 sa 0 upang mailagay ang Proposisyon G sa balota. Bumoto ang mga Superbisor ayon sa sumusunod: 

Oo: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton. 

Hindi: Wala.

 

Kailangan ng panukalang-batas na ito ng 50%+1 botong oo para maipasa. 

Argumento ng May-Panukala na Pabor sa Proposisyon G

Bumoto ng OO sa Proposisyon G upang maprotektahan ang mga essential worker (nagtatrabaho sa industriyang mahalaga sa pagpapatuloy ng kritikal na mga gawain) at ang pampublikong kalusugan 

Naipakita na ng COVID-19 ang malalawak na agwat sa pagprotekta sa mga essential worker, at ang taon-taon na lumalalang panahon ng sunog, na nagdudulot ng mas maraming araw kung saan masama sa kalusugan ang kalidad ng hangin. 

Tutugunan ng Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan o Public Health Emergency Leave ang pagiging malala ng mga bantang ito, sa pamamagitan ng dalawang karagdagang linggo ng may bayad na pagliban sa daan-daang libong manggagawa sa San Francisco sa panahon ng emergency — may bayad na pagliban na pumoprotekta sa ating lahat. 

Awtomatikong maaaring magamit ang Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan sa panahon ng anumang emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan kung may sakit kayo, kailangang magkuwarantenas, kailangang mag-alaga ng miyembro ng pamilya, o hindi makapagtrabaho nang dahil dito. 

Maaaring agad na magamit ang Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan nang hindi na kailangang maipon pa, at sinasakop nito ang lahat ng empleyado ng pribadong kompanya na may 100 o higit pang empleyado sa kabuuan ng mundo, at mga empleyado ng Lungsod. 

Sa mga araw na masama sa kalusugan ang kalidad ng hangin, magkakaroon ng Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan ang mga manggagawang nagtatrabaho sa labas ng gusali at may hika o iba pang kondisyon na sensitibo sa hangin na mababa ang kalidad. 

Ang pagprotekta sa mga nagtatrabaho ay pagprotekta sa pampublikong kalusugan. 

Naipakita na sa atin ng pandemya na malusog lamang tayo kung malusog din ang ating mga kapitbahay. Walang sinumang indibidwal ang dapat pumili sa pagitan ng pagbabayad ng upa o pagpasok sa trabaho habang may nakahahawa at maaaring nakamamatay na sakit. Walang magulang na dapat pumili sa pagitan ng pagsuweldo at paghahatid sa may sakit na anak sa paaralan. Sa pamamagitan ng pagpapahaba sa bisa ng Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan para sa mga emergency sa kasalukuyan at sa hinaharap, ginagamit natin ang mga leksiyong mula sa pandemyang ito, at mas magiging handa na tayo para sa susunod. 

Binibigyang-lakas ng polisiyang ito, na nakabatay sa sentido komun, ang mga nagtatrabaho upang maprotektahan nila ang sarili at tayong lahat. Pinamunuan ng San Francisco ang bansa sa pamamagitan ng pagpasa sa may bayad na pagliban nang dahil sa sakit noong 2006. Mamuno tayong muli at ipasa ang Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan sa 2022. 

Samahan kami sa pagboto ng OO sa Proposisyon G. 

Superbisor Gordon Mar 

Superbisor Connie Chan 

Superbisor Hillary Ronen 

Superbisor Dean Preston

 

Ang mga argumento ay opinyon ng mga awtor at hindi siniyasat ng anumang opisyal na ahensiya para sa kawastuhan. Inilimbag ang mga argumento ayon sa pagkakasumite. Hindi iwinasto ang maling spelling o grammar.
Sagot sa Argumento ng May-Panukala na Pabor sa Proposisyon G

Walang Isinumiteng Sagot o Argumento ng Katunggali Laban sa Proposisyon G

Ang mga argumento ay opinyon ng mga awtor at hindi siniyasat ng anumang opisyal na ahensiya para sa kawastuhan. Inilimbag ang mga argumento ayon sa pagkakasumite. Hindi iwinasto ang maling spelling o grammar.
May Bayad na Argumentong PABOR sa Proposisyon G

May Bayad na Argumento na PABOR sa Proposisyon G

Sinusuportahan ng mga Manggagawang Lider ang Proposisyon G 

Naapektuhan nang lubos ng pandemya ang essential workers (nagtatrabaho sa industriyang mahalaga sa pagpapatuloy ng kritikal na mga gawain), mula sa mga manggagawa sa pangangalaga ng kalusugan at first responders (unang tumutugon sa panahon ng krisis) hanggang sa mga nagbebenta sa tindahan at nagkakaloob ng mga serbisyo. Kapag kailangang pumili ng may sakit na mga empleyado sa pagitan ng kabuhayan at kalusugan, o kapag kailangang pumili ng magulang sa pagitan ng suweldo o pagpapapasok sa may sakit na bata sa paaralan, lahat tayo ay nasa mas masamang kalagayan. Binibigyang-lakas ng pagpapalawak ng may bayad na pagliban sa panahon ng emergency sa pampublikong kalusugan ang mga nagtatrabaho, at nang maprotektahan nila ang mga sarili, at ang ating buong komunidad.  

San Francisco Labor Council (Konseho sa Paggawa ng San Francisco) 

Ang totoong (mga) pinagmulan ng pondo para sa bayad sa pagpapalimbag ng argumentong ito: San Francisco Labor & Neighbor Member Education  / Political Issues Committee (Komite para sa Edukasyon ng mga Kasaping Manggagawa at Kapitbahay / Politikal na mga Usapin sa San Francisco) na itinataguyod ng SF Labor Council.

May Bayad na Argumento na PABOR sa Proposisyon G

Nalampasan ng San Francisco ang pandemyang ito sa pamamagitan ng pamumuno sa mga pagsusumikap para sa pampublikong kalusugan at pagsuporta sa ating mga komunidad.  Napanatili tayo sa maayos na kalagayan ng essential workers sa pamamagitan ng pagpapanatiling bukas sa mga groseriya, klinika para sa pangangalaga ng kalusugan, at pagganap ng kritikal na mga serbisyo. Kailangan nating tiyakin na makakukuha ang mga manggagawang maaapektuhan ng sakit o problema sa kalidad ng hangin ng kinakailangan na karagdagang panahon para gumaling o para alagaan ang may sakit na miyembro ng pamilya.  Bumoto ng OO sa Prop G! 

Sinusuportahan ng mga San Francisco Democratic Party (Partido Demokratiko) ng San Francisco ang Prop G. 

Honey Mahogany, Tagapangulo*  

Keith Baraka, Pangalawang Tagapangulo* 

Li Miao Lovett, Pangalawang Tagapangulo* 

Peter Gallotta, Pangalawang Tagapangulo* 

Anabel Iban͂ez, Sekretarya para sa Pakikipagkomunikasyon * 

Janice Li, Sekretarya para sa Pagkakaroon ng mga Rekord, Direktor ng Lupon ng BART* 

Carolina Morales, Tesorero* 

Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club (Alice B. Toklas na Samahang Demokratiko na LGBT) 

Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club (Harvey Milk na Samahang Demokratiko na LGBT) 

*Para lamang sa identipikasyon; pumipirma ang awtor bilang indibidwal at hindi sa ngalan ng organisasyon.

Ang totoong (mga) pinagmulan ng pondo para sa bayad sa pagpapalimbag ng argumentong ito: Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club PAC:

Ang tatlong pinakamalalaking nagbigay ng kontribusyon sa true source recipient committee (komite na tumatanggap mula sa tunay na pinagmulan ng pondo): 1. Golden State Warriors, 2. National Union of Healthcare Workers (Pambansang Unyon ng mga Manggagawa para sa Pangangalagang Pangkalusugan) 3. David Campos for Assembly 2022 (David Campos para sa Asembleya 2022).

Pagtatapos ng May Bayad na Argumento na PABOR sa Proposisyon G

Ang mga argumento ay opinyon ng mga awtor at hindi siniyasat ng anumang opisyal na ahensiya para sa kawastuhan. Inilimbag ang mga argumento ayon sa pagkakasumite. Hindi iwinasto ang maling spelling o grammar.
May Bayad na Pangangatwiran na KONTRA sa Proposisyon G

May Bayad na Argumento na LABAN sa Proposisyon G

Nagpapataw ang Proposisyon G ng nakabibigat na karagdagang pasanin sa lokal na mga negosyo na nahihirapan na sa maling pamamahala ng San Francisco sa pandemyang COVID-19.  Malala pa rito, hindi isinasama ng Proposisyon G ang mga nonprofit na naka-ayon sa City Hall mula sa mga itinatakda nito. Bumoto ng HINDI.

San Francisco Republican Party (Partido Republikano ng San Francisco)

John Dennis, Tagapangulo

Howard Epstein

Richard Worner

Ang totoong (mga) pinagmulan ng pondo para sa bayad sa pagpapalimbag ng argumentong ito: San Francisco Republican Party.

Ang mga argumento ay opinyon ng mga awtor at hindi siniyasat ng anumang opisyal na ahensiya para sa kawastuhan. Inilimbag ang mga argumento ayon sa pagkakasumite. Hindi iwinasto ang maling spelling o grammar.
Legal Text

Ordinance to amend the Police Code to require employers to provide public health emergency leave during a public health emergency.

NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain font.

            Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font.

         Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font.

         Asterisks (*   *   *   *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables.

Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:  

Section 1. The Police Code is hereby amended by adding Article 33P, consisting of Sections 3300P.1 through 3300P.14, to read as follows:

ARTICLE 33P:  PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY LEAVE

SEC. 3300P.1.  TITLE.

This Article 33P shall be known as the “Public Health Emergency Leave Ordinance.”

SEC. 3300P.2.  DEFINITIONS.

For purposes of this Article 33P, the following definitions apply:

“Agency” means the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement or its successor agency.

“Air Quality Emergency” means a day when the Bay Area Air Quality Management District issues a Spare the Air Alert.  

“City” means the City and County of San Francisco.

“Emergency Responder” means an Employee whose work involves emergency medical services, including but not limited to emergency medical services personnel, physicians, nurses, public health personnel, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, 911 operators, and persons with skills or training in operating specialized equipment or other skills needed to provide aid in a Public Health Emergency.

“Employee” means any person providing labor or services for remuneration who is an employee under California Labor Code Section 2775, as may be amended from time to time, including a part-time or temporary employee, and who performs work as an employee within the geographic boundaries of the City. “Employee” includes a participant in a Welfare-to-Work Program when the participant is engaged in work activity that would be considered “employment” under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and any applicable U.S. Department of Labor Guidelines. “Welfare-to-Work Program” includes any public assistance program administered by the Human Services Agency, including but not limited to CalWORKS and the County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP), and any substantially similar successor programs, that require a public assistance applicant or recipient to work in exchange for their grant.

“Employer” means any person, as defined in Section 18 of the California Labor and Employment Code, including corporate officers or executives, who directly or indirectly or through an agent or any other person, including through the services of a temporary services or staffing agency or similar entity, employs or exercises control over the wages, hours, or working conditions of 100 or more employees worldwide, including one or more Employees; provided however that “Employer” shall not include a Non-Profit Organization if the majority of the annual revenue of the Non-Profit Organization is program service revenue that is not unrelated business taxable income under 26 U.S.C. § 512, as may be amended from time to time, and the Non-Profit Organization does not engage in Healthcare Operations. “Employer” shall include the City, but shall not include any government entity other than the City. 

“Family Member” means any person for whom an Employee may use paid sick leave to provide care pursuant to Administrative Code Section 12W.4(a), as may be amended from time to time. 

“Healthcare Operations” means the provision of diagnostic and healthcare services and devices including, without limitation, hospitals, medical clinics, diagnostic testing locations, dentists, pharmacies, blood banks and blood drives, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, other healthcare facilities, healthcare suppliers, home healthcare services providers, mental health providers, or any related and/or ancillary healthcare services. “Healthcare Operations” also includes veterinary care and all healthcare services provided to animals. “Healthcare Operations” excludes fitness and exercise gyms and similar facilities. 

“Healthcare Provider” means a “Health care provider” as that term is defined in the regulations implementing the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 C.F.R. § 825.102, as may be amended from time to time.

“Nonprofit Organization” means a nonprofit corporation, duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation and (if a foreign corporation) in good standing under the laws of the State of California, which corporation has established and maintains valid nonprofit status under 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3), as may be amended from time to time, and all rules and regulations promulgated under such Section.

“Operative Date” means the date this Article 33P becomes operative, which shall be October 1, 2022.

 “Public Health Emergency” means a local or statewide health emergency related to any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease, declared by the City’s local health officer or the state health officer pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code, or an Air Quality Emergency.  

“Public Health Emergency Leave” means paid leave provided by an Employer to an Employee during a Public Health Emergency for the uses described in Section 3300P.4(a) or Section 3300P.4(b), as applicable.  

“Vulnerable Population” means a person who has been diagnosed with heart or lung disease; has respiratory problems including but not limited to asthma, emphysema, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; is pregnant; or is age 60 or older.

SEC. 3300P.3. PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY LEAVE REQUIREMENTS.

(a) Allocation of Public Health Emergency Leave. 

      (1) Except as provided in subsections (a)(2) and (a)(3) below, on the Operative Date, and on January 1 of each year thereafter, an Employer shall allocate Public Health Emergency Leave to each Employee that may be used for all purposes specified in Section 3300P.4(a) or Section 3300P.4(b), as applicable, during that calendar year. The allocation shall be calculated as follows:

                  (A) For an Employee who works a full-time, regular, or fixed schedule, the allocation shall be equal to the number of hours over a two-week period that the Employee regularly works or takes paid leave, not to exceed 80 hours; provided, however, for the remainder of 2022 beginning on the Operative Date, the allocation shall be equal to the number of hours over a one-week period that the Employee regularly works or takes paid leave, not to exceed 40 hours.  

                  (B) For an Employee whose number of weekly work hours varies, the allocation shall be equal to the average number of hours over a two-week period that the Employee worked or took paid leave during the previous calendar year, or since the Employee’s start date if after the beginning of the previous calendar year, not to exceed 80 hours; provided, however, for the remainder of 2022 beginning on the Operative Date, the allocation shall be equal to the average number of hours over a one-week period that the Employee worked or took paid leave during the previous calendar year, or since the Employee’s start date if after the beginning of the previous calendar year, not to exceed 40 hours. 

      (2) If an Employee was not employed on the Operative Date, or on January 1 of a calendar year thereafter, on the start date of the first Public Health Emergency that begins during the Employee’s employment, an Employer shall allocate Public Health Emergency Leave to each such Employee that may be used for all purposes specified in Section 3300P.4(a) or Section 3300P.4(b), as applicable, during that calendar year. The allocation shall be calculated as follows:

                  (A) For an Employee who works a full-time, regular, or fixed schedule, the allocation shall be equal to the number of hours over a two-week period that the Employee regularly works or takes paid leave, not to exceed 80 hours; provided, however, for the remainder of 2022 beginning on the Operative Date, the allocation shall be equal to the number of hours over a one-week period that the Employee regularly works or takes paid leave, not to exceed 40 hours.   

                  (B) For an Employee whose number of weekly work hours varies, the allocation shall be equal to the average number of hours over a two-week period that the Employee worked or took paid leave during the previous six months, or since the Employee’s start date if the Employee has been employed for fewer than six months, not to exceed 80 hours; provided, however, for the remainder of 2022 beginning on the Operative Date, the allocation shall be equal to the average number of hours over a one-week period that the Employee worked or took paid leave during the previous six months, or since the Employee’s start date if the Employee has been employed for fewer than six months, not to exceed 40 hours.

      (3) Offset provisions.

                  (A) During 2022, (i) if an Employer voluntarily extended additional paid leave or paid time off that Employees may use for the reasons described in Section 3300P.4 and that paid leave or paid time off remains in effect on or after the Operative Date of this Article 33P, or (ii) if State COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave requirements are extended beyond September 30, 2022, an Employer may reduce the allocation of Public Health Emergency Leave under subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) for every hour an Employee takes such paid leave or paid time off after the Operative Date.

                  (B) During 2023 and subsequent years, if an Employer is required by federal, state, or City law to provide paid leave or paid time off to address a public health threat, which Employees may use for the reasons described in Section 3300P.4, an Employer may reduce the allocation of Public Health Emergency Leave under subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) for every hour of such paid leave or paid time off the Employer is required to provide.

                  (C) If circumstances that are similar to those described in subsection (a)(3)(A) or subsection (a)(3)(B) merit the addition of other offsets to reduce the otherwise applicable allocation of Public Health Emergency Leave, the Agency may issue guidelines or rules authorizing additional circumstances for an offset of the otherwise applicable allocation of Public Health Emergency Leave. By way of illustration but not limitation, the Agency would be authorized to issue such guidelines or rules if a state law were to require Employers to provide paid leave to address a public health threat, which Employees could use for reasons that are similar to but not the same as the reasons described in Section 3300P.4, or if certain Employers were to voluntarily extend additional paid leave in response to a public health threat that later becomes a Public Health Emergency, which Employees could use for the reasons described in Section 3300P.4.

(b) For the duration of a Public Health Emergency, Public Health Emergency Leave shall be made available to Employees in addition to any paid leave that the Employer offered or provided to Employees as of the date the Public Health Emergency began.  

(c) Public Health Emergency Leave shall be available for immediate use for the purposes described in Section 3300P.4(a) or Section 3300P.4(b), as applicable, regardless of how long the Employee has been employed by the Employer, the Employee’s status (as full-time, part-time, permanent, temporary, seasonal, salaried, paid by commission, or any other status), or any other consideration pertaining to the Employee. 

(d) An Employee may use Public Health Emergency Leave for the purposes described in Section 3300P.4(a) or Section 3300P.4(b), as applicable, before using other accrued paid leave. An Employee may voluntarily choose, but an Employer may not require, induce, or encourage the Employee, to use other accrued paid leave provided by the Employer to the Employee before the Employee uses Public Health Emergency Leave.

(e) This Article 33P provides minimum requirements pertaining to Public Health Emergency Leave and shall not be construed to prevent an Employer from providing or advancing additional paid leave to an Employee, and shall not be construed to limit the amount of paid leave that may be provided to an Employee. This Article shall not be construed to preempt, limit, or otherwise affect the applicability of any other law, regulation, requirement, policy, or standard that provides for greater or different types of paid or unpaid leave, or that extends other protections to employees.  

(f) An Employer is not required to carry over an Employee’s unused Public Health Emergency Leave from year to year. 

(g) Compensation rates under this Article 33P shall be:

      (1) For an Employee who is not exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA, an Employer may calculate pay for Public Health Emergency Leave using either of the following methods:

                  (A) In the same manner as the regular rate of pay for the workweek in which the Employee uses Public Health Emergency Leave, whether or not the Employee works overtime in that workweek; or

                  (B) By dividing the Employee’s total wages, not including overtime premium pay, by the Employee’s total hours worked in the full pay periods of the 90 days of employment prior to the Employee’s use of Public Health Emergency Leave.

      (2) For an Employee who is exempt from the overtime provisions of FLSA and California labor law, pay for Public Health Emergency Leave shall be calculated in the same manner as the Employer calculates wages for other forms of paid leave.

      (3) In no circumstance may Public Health Emergency Leave be provided at less than the minimum wage rate required by the Minimum Wage Ordinance, Administrative Code Chapter 12R. 

SEC. 3300P.4. PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY LEAVE USE.

(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) below, an Employee may use Public Health Emergency Leave during a Public Health Emergency if the Employee is unable to work due to any of the following:

      (1) The recommendations or requirements of an individual or general federal, state, or local health order (including an order issued by the local jurisdiction in which an Employee resides) related to the Public Health Emergency.

      (2) The Employee has been advised by a Healthcare Provider to isolate or quarantine.

      (3) The Employee is experiencing symptoms of and seeking a medical diagnosis, or has received a positive medical diagnosis, for a possible infectious, contagious, or communicable disease associated with the Public Health Emergency.

      (4) The Employee is caring for a Family Member who is subject to an order as described in subsection (a)(1), has been advised as described in subsection (a)(2), or is experiencing symptoms as described in subsection (a)(3).

      (5) The Employee is caring for a Family Member if the school or place of care of the Family Member has been closed, or the care provider of such Family Member is unavailable, due to the Public Health Emergency. 

      (6) An Air Quality Emergency, if the Employee is a member of a Vulnerable Population and primarily works outdoors.

(b) An Employer of an Employee who is a Healthcare Provider or an Emergency Responder may elect to limit such an Employee’s use of Public Health Emergency Leave, but at a minimum such an Employee may use Public Health Emergency Leave during a Public Health Emergency to the extent that the Employee is unable to work due to any of the following:

      (1) The Employee has been advised by a Healthcare Provider to isolate or quarantine.

      (2) The Employee is experiencing symptoms of and is seeking a medical diagnosis, or has received a positive medical diagnosis, for a possible infectious, contagious, or communicable disease associated with the Public Health Emergency and does not meet federal, state, or local guidance to return to work.

      (3) An Air Quality Emergency, if the Employee is a member of a Vulnerable Population, primarily works outdoors, and has been advised by a Healthcare Provider not to work during an Air Quality Emergency.

(c) With respect to subsections (a)(1), (2), and (6) and subsections (b)(1) and (3) above, if an Employee is able to telework without increasing the Employee’s exposure to disease or unhealthy air quality, the Employee may not use Public Health Emergency Leave.

(d) An Employer may not require, as a condition of an Employee’s taking Public Health Emergency Leave, that the Employee search for or find a replacement worker to cover the hours during which the Employee is on Public Health Emergency Leave.

(e) An Employer may not require, as a condition of an Employee’s taking Public Health Emergency Leave, that the Employee take Public Health Emergency Leave in increments of more than one hour.

(f) An Employer may require the Employee to follow reasonable notice procedures in order to use Public Health Emergency Leave, but only when the need for Public Health Emergency Leave is foreseeable.

(g) An Employer may require a doctor’s note or other documentation to confirm an Employee’s status as a member of a Vulnerable Population, if that Employee uses Public Health Emergency Leave for a use inapplicable to an Employee who is not a member of a Vulnerable Population.  An Employer may not otherwise require the disclosure of health information for use of Public Health Emergency Leave.

(h) An Employer shall provide payment for Public Health Emergency Leave taken by an Employee no later than the payday for the next regular payroll period after the Public Health Emergency Leave is taken.

SEC. 3300P.5. NOTICE OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS.

(a) The Agency shall, no later than 30 days after the effective date of this Article 33P, publish and make available to Employers, in English, Spanish, Chinese, Filipino, and any other language spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco workforce, a notice suitable for posting by Employers in the workplace informing Employees of their rights under this Article 33P. The Agency shall update this notice on December 1 of any year in which there is a change in the languages spoken by more than 5% of the San Francisco workforce. In its discretion, the Agency may combine this notice with the notice required by Section 12W.5(a) of the Administrative Code.

(b) Every Employer shall provide the notice prepared by the Agency under subsection (a) above to Employees in all languages the Agency makes available by posting it in a conspicuous place at any workplace or job site where any of its Employees works, and where feasible by providing it to Employees via electronic communication, which may include email, text, and/or posting in a conspicuous place in an Employer’s web-based or app-based platform. 

(c) On the written notice that an Employer is required to provide under Section 246(i) of the California Labor Code, as may be amended from time to time, an Employer shall set forth the amount of Public Health Emergency Leave that is available to the Employee under this Article 33P. If an Employer provides unlimited paid leave or paid time off to an Employee, the Employer may satisfy this subsection (c) by indicating on the notice or the Employee’s itemized wage statement “unlimited.” This subsection (c) shall apply only to Employers that are required by state law to provide such notice to Employees regarding paid sick leave available under California law.

SEC. 3300P.6. EXERCISE OF RIGHTS PROTECTED; RETALIATION PROHIBITED.

(a) It shall be unlawful for an Employer or any other person to interfere with, restrain, or deny the exercise of, or the attempt to exercise, any right protected under this Article 33P.

(b) It shall be unlawful for an Employer or any other person to discharge, threaten to discharge, demote, suspend, reduce other Employee benefits, or in any manner discriminate or take adverse action against any person in retaliation for exercising rights protected under this Article 33P. Such rights include but are not limited to the right to use Public Health Emergency Leave pursuant to this Article 33P; the right to file a complaint or inform any person about any Employer’s alleged violation of this Article 33P; the right to cooperate with the Agency in its investigations of alleged violations of this Article 33P; and the right to inform any person of that person’s potential rights under this Article 33P.

(c) It shall be unlawful for any Employer absence control policy to count an Employee’s use of Public Health Emergency Leave as an absence that, alone or in combination with other absences, may lead to or result in discipline, discharge, demotion, suspension, or any other adverse action.

(d) Protections of this Section 3300P.6 shall apply to any person who mistakenly but in good faith alleges violations of this Article 33P.

(e) Taking adverse action against a person within 90 days of the person’s filing a complaint with the Agency or a court alleging a violation of any provision of this Article 33P; informing any person about an Employer’s alleged violation of this Article; cooperating with the Agency or other persons in the investigation or prosecution of any alleged violation of this Article; opposing any policy, practice, or act that is unlawful under this Article; or informing any person of that person’s rights under this Article shall raise a rebuttable presumption that such adverse action was taken in retaliation for the exercise of one or more of the aforementioned rights.

SEC. 3300P.7. EMPLOYER RECORDS.

Employers shall retain records documenting hours worked by Employees and Public Health Emergency Leave taken by Employees, for a period of four years, and shall allow the Agency access to such records, with reasonable notice, to monitor compliance with the requirements of this Article 33P. When an issue arises as to an Employee’s entitlement to Public Health Emergency Leave under this Article, if the Employer does not maintain or retain accurate and adequate records documenting hours worked by the Employee and Public Health Emergency Leave taken by the Employee, or does not allow the Agency reasonable access to such records, it shall be presumed that the Employer has violated this Article, absent clear and convincing evidence otherwise.

SEC. 3300P.8. IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT.

(a) The Agency is authorized to implement and enforce this Article 33P and may promulgate guidelines or rules for such purposes. Any rules promulgated by the Agency shall have the force and effect of law and may be relied on by Employers, Employees, and other persons to determine their rights and responsibilities under this Article. 

(b) An Employee or any other person, who has reason to believe that a violation of this Article 33P has occurred may report the suspected violation to the Agency. The Agency shall encourage such reporting by keeping confidential, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the name and other identifying information of the individual reporting the suspected violation; provided, however, that with the authorization of the reporting individual, the Agency may disclose the name of the reporting individual and identifying information as necessary to enforce this Article or for other lawful purposes.

(c) The Agency may investigate possible violations of this Article 33P.      

      (1) Where the Agency has reason to believe that a violation has occurred, it may order any appropriate temporary or interim relief to mitigate the violation or maintain the status quo pending completion of a full investigation.    

      (2) Where, following an investigation that affords due process, including notice of the alleged violation and the right to respond, the Agency determines that a violation has occurred, the Agency may issue a determination of violation and order any appropriate relief. 

                  (A) If any Public Health Emergency Leave was unlawfully withheld, the dollar amount of paid leave withheld from the Employee multiplied by three, or $500, whichever amount is greater, shall be awarded as an administrative penalty paid to the Employee, pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIIC, Section 1(e)(5). 

                  (B) For violation of Section 3300P.6, the Agency shall award appropriate restitution to each person subjected to the violation, including but not limited to reinstatement and back pay. 

                  (C) Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIIC, Section 1(e)(5), the Agency may order administrative penalties of $500 for each of the following violations: failure to post notice pursuant to Section 3300P.5, violation of Section 3300P.6, refusing to allow access to records pursuant to Section 3300P.7, failure to maintain or retain accurate and adequate records pursuant to Section 3300P.7, and any other violation not specified in this Section 3300P.8(c)(2). These penalties shall be increased cumulatively by 50% for each subsequent violation of the same provision by the same Employer within a three-year period. 

                  (D) To compensate the City for the reasonable regulatory costs of investigating and remedying the violation, pursuant to California Constitution Article XIIIC, Section 1(e)(3), the Agency may also order the Employer to pay to the City an amount that does not exceed its investigation and administrative enforcement costs.   

      (3) The determination of violation shall provide notice to the Employer of the right to appeal the determination to the City Controller and that failure to do so within 15 days shall result in the determination becoming a final administrative decision, which the City may seek to enforce as a judgment in superior court.

      (4) The determination of violation shall specify a reasonable time period for payment of any relief ordered. The Agency may award interest on all amounts due and unpaid at the expiration of such time period at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code, as may be amended from time to time.

      (5) The remedies and penalties provided under subsection (c)(2) above are cumulative.

      (6) The Agency may require that remedies and penalties due and owing to Employees be paid directly to the City for disbursement to the Employees. The Controller shall hold these funds in escrow for the Employees. The Agency shall make best efforts to distribute such funds to Employees. In the event such funds are unclaimed for a period of three years, the Controller may undertake administrative procedures for escheat of unclaimed funds under California Government Code Section 50050, et seq., as may be amended from time to time. Such escheated funds shall be dedicated to the enforcement of this Article 33P or other laws the Agency enforces.

(d) Appeal Procedure. An appeal from a determination of violation (“Appeal”) may be filed by the Appellant in accordance with the following procedures:

      (1) The Appellant shall file the Appeal with the City Controller and serve a copy on the Agency. The Appeal shall be filed in writing within 15 days of the date of service of the determination of violation, and shall specify the basis for the Appeal and shall request that the Controller appoint a hearing officer to hear and decide the Appeal. Failure to submit a timely, written Appeal shall constitute concession to the violation, and the determination of violation shall be deemed the final administrative decision upon expiration of the 15-day period. Further, failure to submit a timely, written Appeal shall constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, which shall serve as a complete defense to any petition or claim brought against the City regarding the determination of violation.

      (2) Following the filing of the Appeal and service of a copy on the Agency, the Agency shall promptly afford Appellant an opportunity to meet and confer in good faith regarding possible resolution of the Determination of Violation.

      (3) Within 30 days of receiving an Appeal, the Controller shall appoint an impartial hearing officer who is not part of the Agency and immediately notify the Agency and Appellant of the appointment.  

      (4) The hearing officer shall promptly set a date for a hearing. The hearing must commence within 45 days of the date of the Controller’s notice of appointment of the hearing officer, and conclude within 75 days of such notice, provided, however, that the hearing officer may extend these time limits upon a determination of good cause.  

      (5) The hearing officer shall conduct a fair and impartial evidentiary hearing.  The Agency shall have the burden of proof in such hearing. 

      (6) Within 30 days of the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing officer shall issue a written decision affirming, modifying, or dismissing the determination of violation. The hearing officer’s decision shall be the final administrative decision. The decision shall consist of findings, a determination, any relief ordered, a reasonable time period for payment of any relief ordered, and notice to the Employer of the right to appeal by filing a petition for a writ of mandate in San Francisco Superior Court under California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.5, et seq., as may be amended from time to time, and that failure to file a timely appeal shall result in the final administrative decision becoming enforceable as a judgment by the superior court.

      (7) Appellant may appeal the final administrative decision only by filing in San Francisco Superior Court a petition for a writ of mandate under California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.5, et seq., as applicable, and as may be amended from time to time.

(e) Where an Employer fails to comply with a final administrative decision within the time period required therein, the Agency may take any appropriate enforcement action to secure compliance, including referring the action to the City Attorney to seek to enforce the final administrative decision as a judgment in superior court, and/or except where prohibited by State or Federal law, requesting that City agencies or departments revoke or suspend any registration certificates, permits, or licenses held or requested by the Employer until such time as the violation is remedied. 

SEC. 3300P.9.  CIVIL ENFORCEMENT.

The City Attorney or any person aggrieved by a violation of this Article 33P may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against an Employer for violating any requirement of this Article 33P and, upon prevailing, shall be entitled to such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation including, without limitation, all forms of relief available under Section 3300P.8(c), plus interest on all amounts due and unpaid at the rate of interest specified in subdivision (b) of Section 3289 of the California Civil Code. The court shall award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to the prevailing party.

SEC. 3300P.10. WAIVER THROUGH COLLECTIVE BARGAINING.

All or any portion of the requirements of this Article 33P shall not apply to Employees covered by a bona fide collective bargaining agreement to the extent that such requirements are expressly waived in the collective bargaining agreement in clear and unambiguous terms.

SEC. 3300P.11. PREEMPTION.

Nothing in this Article 33P shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any power, right, or duty in conflict with federal or state law. The term “conflict,” as used in this Section 3300P.11, means a conflict that is preemptive under federal or state law.  

SEC. 3300P.12. CITY UNDERTAKING LIMITED TO PROMOTION OF THE GENERAL WELFARE.

In undertaking the adoption and enforcement of this Article 33P, the City is undertaking only to promote the general welfare. The City is not assuming, nor is it imposing on its officers and employees, an obligation for breach of which it is liable in money damages to any person who claims that such breach proximately caused injury. This Article does not create a legally enforceable right by any member of the public against the City.

SEC. 3300P.13. SEVERABILITY.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Article 33P, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Article. The voters hereby declare that they would have passed this Article and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word not declared invalid and unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of this Article or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SEC. 3300P.14. AMENDMENT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.

(a) The Board of Supervisors may by ordinance amend this Article 33P with respect to matters relating to its implementation and enforcement and matters relating to Employer requirements for verification or documentation of an Employee’s use of Public Health Emergency Leave. 

(b) The Board of Supervisors may by ordinance amend this Article 33P’s substantive requirements or scope of coverage as follows:

      (1) as to Air Quality Emergencies, without limitation, and

      (2) as to other provisions of this Article, only for the purpose of adopting greater or additional substantive requirements or broader coverage.

(c) In the event any provision in this Article 33P is held legally invalid, the Board of Supervisors retains the power to adopt an ordinance concerning the subject matter that was covered in the invalid provision.

(d) Nothing in this Article 33P prevents the Board of Supervisors by ordinance from providing for greater or different types of paid or unpaid leave, or extending other protections to employees or other workers.

Section 2. Effective Date and Operative Date.

(a)  The effective date of this ordinance shall be 10 days after the date the official vote count is declared by the Board of Supervisors. 

(b)  As stated in Police Code Section 3300P.2, this ordinance shall become operative on October 1, 2022.

 

 

  • Impormasyon tungkol sa mga Lokal na Panukalang-batas na nasa Balota at mga Argumento
    • Pangkalahatang Buod ng Utang ng San Francisco
    • Mga Salitang Dapat Ninyong Malaman
    • Proposisyon A: Bond (utang ng gobyerno) para sa Pagiging Maaasahan ng Muni at Kaligtasan sa mga Kalye
    • Proposisyon B: Building Inspection Commission (Komisyon sa Pag-iinspeksiyon ng mga Gusali)
    • Proposisyon C: Iskedyul ng mga Gawain para sa Recall (Pagpapaalis sa Katungkulan) at Pagtatalaga para sa Nabakanteng mga Katungkulan
    • Proposisyon D: Office of Victim and Witness Rights (Opisina para sa mga Karapatan ng mga Biktima at Saksi); Serbisyo Legal para sa mga Biktima ng Karahasan sa Tahanan
    • Proposisyon E: Behested Payments (Perang Hinihiling ng Pampublikong Opisyal para sa Layuning Lehislatibo, para sa Gobyerno, o Pangkawanggawa)
    • Proposisyon F: Pangongolekta at Pagtatapon sa Basura
    • Proposisyon G: Pagliban nang Dahil sa Emergency sa Pampublikong Kalusugan
    • Proposisyon H: Panukala ukol sa Recall (Pagpapaalis sa Katungkulan) ni Chesa Boudin

Subaybayan kami!



© SF Department of Elections all rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

  • Pangkalahatang Impormasyon
  • Impormasyon tungkol sa Kandidato
  • Mga Lokal na Panukalang-batas sa Balota