Shall Alison Collins be recalled (removed) from the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District?
Digest by the Ballot Simplification Committee
The Way It Is Now: Alison Collins is a member of the Board of Education (School Board) that governs the San Francisco Unified School District (School District). The School District operates the San Francisco public school system through 12th grade.
On November 6, 2018, Alison Collins was elected to the School Board to a four-year term ending on January 8, 2023.
On November 8, 2022, the City will hold its regularly scheduled election for School Board members, and the candidates elected at that time would serve for a full four-year term beginning on January 8, 2023.
The Proposal: Proposition A is a recall measure that would remove Alison Collins from the School Board 10 days after the Board of Supervisors declares the results of this election. The Mayor would then appoint a replacement to serve on the School Board for the rest of Alison Collins’ term.
The replacement appointed by the Mayor may run as a candidate for the School Board in the November 2022 election.
A "YES" Vote Means: If you vote "yes," you want to remove Alison Collins from the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District.
A "NO" Vote Means: If you vote "no," you want to keep Alison Collins on the School Board for the San Francisco Unified School District.
Controller's Statement on "A"
City Controller Ben Rosenfield has issued the following statement on the fiscal impact of Proposition A:
Should the proposed School Board recall measure be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would have a minimal impact on the cost of government.
As is always the case in our ballot analysis, this does not include the cost of administering the election, which is unchanged regardless of the outcome of the measure.
How "A" Got on the Ballot
On September 7, 2021, the Department of Elections (Department) received a petition to recall Board of Education member Alison Collins. After review, the Department determined that the petition contained a sufficient number of valid signatures to require a special municipal (recall) election be held.
The total number of signatures on the petition was 75,304. The Department reviewed 3,765 randomly selected signatures (5% of the total submitted) which indicated the petition contained a number of valid signatures greater than the minimum 51,325 signatures required for the petition to be deemed successful.
This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass.
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition APaid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
This campaign is personal.
We saw the fallout in our own family when schools were closed: Siva’s high school honors student failing classes and barely leaving his bed; Autumn’s kids happily learning in person elsewhere. It was unfair.
So when emails, calls, and protests went unheard, we started this recall to give families hope.
We knew nothing about politics, so we stood up and asked for help. And help came from all over the city.
Parents and teachers joined forces to collect signatures. 80,000 people signed to recall the school board -- the first citywide recall in decades.
Our school board is incompetent, and you should recall them. Renaming instead of reopening. Ignoring a massive budget deficit. Collins’s anti-Asian tweets and $87 million lawsuit against our schools.
But this recall is about more than that. It’s about giving our most disadvantaged kids a brighter future.
Siva grew up under a government more fixated on changing the street signs than filling the potholes -- or having working schools. Where every family who could afford to (and many who could not) put their kids in private school.
Siva’s family could not afford it. But they sent him anyway, even when it meant skipping food for days. That education is why he’s here today, instead of breaking down ships in the sweltering sun like so many of his friends.
We are failing San Francisco’s most disadvantaged children in the same way: changing school names instead of making sure the kids inside can read. Ignoring the learning loss that will steal their dreams.
We’re standing up for them, fighting for every kid to get a great education and build a successful life.
We need you. Will you help us?
Vote YES to recall the school board.
www.recallsfschoolboard.org
Autumn Looijen & Siva Raj
Recall Campaign Co-leads
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Recall School Board Members López, Collins & Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Arthur Rock, 2. David Sacks, 3. Garry Tan.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
Vote YES on the non-partisan, parent-led recall of Alison Collins! Due to her negligent "leadership," SFUSD is facing a $125 million budget shortfall, was the only major metropolitan district in America to not return middle and high school students to classrooms last year, and has one of the worst racial achievement gaps in California. Collins' response to these challenges has been to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars renaming schools, sue the district for $87 million after she was censured for posting anti-Asian tweets, and attack parents. Enough is enough. Recall Collins to put students first.
San Francisco Republican Party
John Dennis, Chairman
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: San Francisco Republican Party County Central Committee (State Account).
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
I support the recall of all three San Francisco School Board members because they have failed at their jobs and failed our students.
Events of the last year and a half of this global pandemic have put our public school system in an incredibly challenging position, and right now we are at a crossroads.
Our kids must come first. But our School Board's priorities have often been severely misplaced, undermining the education and mental health of our students.
This grassroots recall effort is led by parents whose kids have fallen far behind in their education, are breaking down from the mental health challenges of a pandemic, exacerbated by chaos in our public school system. These three school board members didn't listen to their voices, prioritize their kids in the classroom or try to solve the immense problems facing the District.
It's essential that we have leadership that will tackle the challenges of hiring a new Superintendent who will lead the District through one of the most pivotal times in its history, help move the District out of its current dire fiscal situation and back onto solid financial footing, and focus on helping our students succeed after spending more than a year out of the classroom.
It's time for new school board members who put kids first.
Mayor London Breed
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Concerned Parents Supporting the Recall of Collins, Lopez, and Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Brian Singerman, 2. Terence Abad, 3. Ann Hsu.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
I support the recall of all three Board of Education Members, Collins, Lopez and Moliga, because they have failed in their responsibilities as members of the Board and have failed our students and families.
These three Board of Education members have all too often focused on politics instead of students.
While they should have been singularly focused on safely reopening our schools, they voted against hiring a consultant to help with that process - which the Superintendent described as a “body blow” to reopening efforts - and spent time discussing renaming our schools rather than re-opening them.
They’ve allowed the school district’s fiscal standing to deteriorate so severely that the state Superintendent of Public Instruction intervened to stop the school district from becoming financially insolvent. The district needs strong and responsible leadership to right the ship.
Families are pulling their children from our schools, and enrollment is at its lowest level in decades. We need leadership that prioritizes and uplifts all of our students and that is fully focused on their well-being over personal political priorities.
Senator Scott Wiener
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Concerned Parents Supporting the Recall of Collins, Lopez, and Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Brian Singerman, 2. Terence Abad, 3. Ann Hsu.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
As parents, students, teachers, and graduates of Galileo Academy of Science & Technology, we join our esteemed graduate Mayor London Breed in support of the recall of Commissioners Collins, Moliga and Lopez.
Our community suffered greatly during COVID, a situation made worse by the School Board not listening to us or putting student needs and education first. By their actions on certain matters and inaction on others, they have shown that their priorities are not aligned with ours and that they are unwilling and incapable of fixing the budget problems of the entire school district.
Their continued presence makes it nearly impossible to attract the best superintendent to San Francisco. Therefore, they should be recalled on February 15th.
Ann Hsu
Barbara Hanscome
Bonnie McFarland
Chanda Seymour
Curtis Chan
David McGinn
Dung Ky Tran
Heike Hiss
Jenny Qiao
Joanne Bedwell
Lyla Patel
Matthew Mumper
Mindy Ng
Serena Chan
Summer Himell
Tina Fan
Valerie Azinheira
Wendy Hanrahan
Xiaoqing He
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Recall School Board Members Lopez, Collins and Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. David Sacks, 2. Arthur Rock, 3. Garry Tan.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
This Board of Education has failed so completely at its job that we now face a special election to recall several of its members.
Families for San Francisco considers five principles in evaluating each removal:
1 - Performance: failure to perform the duties of the office to a minimum standard.
2 - Process: undemocratic processes while in office; blatant disregard of rules and procedures.
3 - Power: abuse of power and position to harass or diminish the voice of constituents.
4 - Interest: placing personal interest over the interests of the public and/or the institution that is overseen.
5- Conduct: pattern of conduct that disrupts the proper functioning of the position, office, or agency.
Alison Collins has failed to perform to the minimum standards for a Board of Education commissioner. Collins was a champion for the school renaming project instead of fighting to reopen them during the pandemic. She has abused her office to harass and diminish constituents on multiple occasions. She demonstrated extreme bias against the AAPI community and failed to apologize. When multiple political figures called on her to resign, she responded by suing the school district and her colleagues.
Families for San Francisco recommends a vote to recall Commissioner Alison Collins.
Patrick Wolff - Executive Director
Families for San Francisco
familiesforsanfrancisco.com
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Families for San Francisco.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
Educators in support of recalling Lopez, Collins, & Moliga
As career educators, proud Democrats, and San Francisco residents, we fully support the recall of SFUSD Board of Education Commissioners Lopez, Collins, and Moliga.
They have disregarded stakeholder input from parents and community members, and publicly berated SFUSD staff and parents. Their “hands off” approach to the management of facilities bond monies have left schools in unsafe disarray, and now shamelessly want to take the $100m approved by voters for the Arts Center at 135 Van Ness to pay for their mistakes despite the years of SFUSD money already spent for the Arts Center and detailed planning. They reshuffled Public Education Enrichment Fund spending without stakeholder input, despite those funds being approved by San Francisco voters for Arts, Music, Sports, and Libraries.
Many of our schools should be renamed. Any racism or exclusion needs to be addressed, whether at Lowell High School or any school in our city. The Board has bungled these plans, using the pandemic to shut out community input and violating the adequate public notice rules of the Brown Act. Prioritizing this during the pandemic left all students, especially our most marginalized students, with substantial learning loss. With a budget crisis looming, the Board has continued to fund initiatives based on their own political agenda and do not benefit students and schools.
The recall does not call for permanent mayoral control of the Board. We must vote to Recall Lopez, Collins, and Moliga, before further damage is done to our schools and the services for our students and to address the declining enrollment.
William Hack, SFUSD Teacher, Principal, and Supervisor, retired.
Marcia Parrott, Teacher, Principal, retired
Nancy Yan Ng, School Social Worker, retired
Marigrace Cohen, Administrator, retired
Linda Festa Plack, Teacher, retired, Former Vice President UESF
Jean Ramirez, retired Educator
Pam Wong Kline, Teacher, Supervisor, retired
Terry Kline, Teacher, retired
Gilda Sullivan, Teacher, retired
Susan Stauter, SFUSD Artistic Director, retired
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Recall School Board Members Lopez, Collins & Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. David Sacks, 2. Arthur Rock, 3. Garry Tan.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
DON’T DESTROY THE MURALS. RECALL THE SCHOOL BOARD.
Commissioners Alison Collins, Faauuga Moliga, and Gabriela Lopez voted to paint over George Washington High School’s murals because they depict an unvarnished history of America’s founding.
These murals honestly present our first President and his times, highlighting the American Revolution and creation of the Constitution, and Washington’s commitment to education. They also show African American enslavement at Mount Vernon and the disastrous consequences of western expansion for Native Americans. The muralist, a colleague of Diego Rivera, was persecuted for his political views.
Poet Alice Walker, whose daughter attended George Washington High, commented: “it is never a good idea to destroy art; it is better to explain it. That is what education helps us to do; the murals depict George Washington in a truer light than most other works and histories.”
Dewey Crumpler, creator of the “Multi-Ethnic Heritage” mural at George Washington, warned, “If you whitewash that mural, it will only bleed in history more powerfully than it bleeds right now.”
As educators, artists, historians and citizens who oppose censorship, we want these murals, as well as those at Mission High School, Roosevelt Middle School, Aptos Middle School, and Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy, to be used for their intended purpose – to illustrate history.
President Biden stated “Great nations don’t ignore their most painful moments…they embrace them... And in remembering those moments, we begin to heal and grow stronger.”
When artworks depict uncomfortable but historically accurate images, they stimulate discussions about our past and energize students.
Don’t “cancel” the George Washington High murals. Recall Commissioners Alison Collins, Faauuga Moliga and Gabriela Lopez.
Matt Gonzalez, Former President Board of Supervisors*
John Burton, Former Chair California Democratic Party*
Robert Cherny
Rebecca Cherny
Robert Flynn Johnson
Jeff Brown, Former Public Defender*
Larry Griffin
John Rothman
Paul Arnautoff
Annette Melville
Marie Jose Durquet, Teacher
William Lee, Retired Chief Administrative Officer*
Dr. James Davis
Dr. Thomas Raffin
Carolyn Lee
David Takashima
Larry Simi
Peter G. Hanson
*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization.
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Recall School Board Members Lopez, Collins, Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. David Sacks, 2. Arthur Rock, 3. Garry Tan.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
We are parents, teachers and alumni of Lowell High School. We support the recall of all three members of the Board of Education, because they have failed the families of San Francisco and particularly of our school.
We agree with others who have pointed out the many ways that these elected officials have not done their jobs, not focused on dealing with the pandemic and so mismanaged finances that the state might take over the district. But there are other issues that affect our school in particular.
People across the district and even at Lowell disagree about whether there should be competitive or lottery admissions. But almost everyone agrees that before making such a fundamental change to a San Francisco institution, the board needed to learn as much as possible about the issue, look at studies of other schools and cities across the country and world and listen to people throughout the district and at our school who will be most affected by such a change.
That didn’t happen.
Instead, the School Board made a rushed decision in minimal time, did no research, allowed very little public input and made no effort at all to reach out to the school community. That is not the way important decisions should be made. Those elected to run large public institutions should know better. San Francisco deserves better.
Please vote to recall all three members of the Board of Education.
Lowell High School* faculty: Brian Danforth, Kathy Liu, Jennifer Moffitt, Eller Reller and John (Monty) Worth
Kate Lazarus, President, Lowell Alumni Association*
Former Presidents, Lowell Alumni Association*: Roberta Bleiweiss, Wendy Drefke Shinbori, Lisa Clay and John Trasviña
Former Presidents, Lowell PTSA*: Kwan Wang and Missy Sue Mastel
Jack Anderson, alumnus and retired Lowell High School* faculty
Terence Abad, alumnus
*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization.
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Terence Abad, Lisa Clay, Kate Lazarus, Missy Sue Mastel, Wendy Drefke Shinbori, John Trasviña and John (Monty) Worth.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
Three members (Collins, Lopez, Moliga) of the SF Board of Education have fueled the current crisis in SFUSD. These members have thwarted plans to open school safely, have mismanaged the budget, and have ignored community voices in developing educational policy. Instead, they have energized conflicts, have indulged in renaming schools, and have damaged academic excellence with a lottery admission at Lowell.
Education will continue to suffer if these commissioners continue to serve and make more poor, uninformed decisions. SFBOE desperately needs new leadership now.
Please help our children!
Vote YES to recall all 3 commissioners and save public education.
Kit Lam, SFUSD parent
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Kit Lam.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
Taxpayers deserve better! Recall School Board Members Collins, Moliga and Lopez!
San Francisco’s public schools are a disgrace to pupils and the taxpayers who underwrite expenditures.
Enrollment is about 49,500 students, less than half the 1970 enrollment when San Francisco’s population was almost 100,000 less than now.
School Board spending has created an enormous deficit. Over one year ago, the state Department of Education ordered the District to prepare a financial recovery plan from an expected deficit over $100,000,000 in 2022. Only now, with the State ready to assume decision-making over the operation and budget of our schools, is the School Board preparing a plan.
The Board hired several expensive local and out of town law firms to defend itself against three losing lawsuits for violating the open meeting law. These Board members put politics above students when they voted unlawfully to rename 44 schools, cover over historic murals at George Washington High School without obeying the California Environmental Quality Act, and suffered an attorney fee award of $145,000 while dumbing down admission requirements at Lowell High School. Lowell, a unique, nationally recognized high school with admission based on grades, tests, and essays, has been a multi-year obsession of these unqualified Board members to abandon merit and adopt lottery admissions.
Without merit, Commissioner Collins sued the District and board members for $87,000,000 costing the District another $120,000 in legal costs. Instead of seeking reimbursement from Collins, Commissioner Moliga and the Board opted to pay the costs -- effectively leaving less money for classrooms and students. The Board continues to assign pupils to schools outside their own neighborhood schools under a “lottery” system, which with busing, costs taxpayers millions.
For the sake of students and taxpayers, vote to recall Commissioners Collins, Moliga, and Lopez.
San Francisco Taxpayers Association
Quentin L. Kopp, President
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: San Francisco Taxpayers Association.
Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition A
We are Chinese Americans supporting the recall of Commissioner Collins.
Join us in voting YES on Proposition A.
The Chinese American community has no confidence in Commissioner Alison Collins, in her ability to effectively serve our school district.
Chinese Americans, and a diverse group of civic leaders have called for the resignation of Commissioner Collins because her past tweets exacerbated the fear and pain the Asian American community continues to endure after decades of discrimination and exclusion. This is especially true in a time of rampant AAPI Hate brought by COVID-19.
Commissioner Collins' record is dismal when looking at what she has done to improve K-8 education to better prepare all students for high school. "When the Superintendent sought Board approval for a safety coordinator to reopen schools post-COVID, she voted no." She failed to focus on safe school reopening. She and others ended the academic admissions policy at Lowell without listening to students, parents, Alumni, and Community. She failed to include us in the decision making process. She made us feel like we didn’t exist, that we don’t count. In the background, we hear the same sentiment many of our ancestors heard in the 1880s, “Too many Chinese (Asians)!”.
We firmly believe that Asians Belong.
Please stand with us by voting Yes on Proposition A to recall Commissioner Collins.
Bayard Peter Fong, Chinese American Democratic Club (CADC) President*
Eddie Chin, Former San Francisco School Board Commissioner
Linda Quan, Retired Accountant
Victor Seeto, Lowell HS Graduate
Sam Kwong, Architect
Calvin Louie, CPA
*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization.
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Bayard Peter Fong.
End of Paid Arguments IN FAVOR of Proposition A
Paid Arguments Against Proposition APaid Argument AGAINST Proposition A
JOIN SFUSD PARENTS & TEACHERS IN VOTING NO ON THE RECALL OF ALISON COLLINS
Alison Collins has worked to increase access to the Arts for all students, supported the wellness and achievement of African-American, Latinx, Native American and Asian/Pacific Islander youth. She advocated for wellness checks to help families get resources such as rent relief, anti-eviction services, mental health and food services.
Over the past 2 years she and the Board of Education have delivered:
-A crisis distance learning program for all 50,000+ students
-1.2 million meals to families in need
-Thousands of laptops, WiFi hotspots, and learning kits to students
-Safely returned to in-person instruction in spring 2020 and fall 2021 with robust contact tracing and safety protocols which prevented outbreaks and costly school shutdowns.
This recall is a political strategy funded by a few wealthy donors to benefit only a few politically while destabilizing district leadership and disrupting community efforts to improve our schools.
If the recall passes, you don’t get a vote in who represents you. The mayor will install political appointees. Our schools, students and families deserve leadership that represents them, not political insiders. Your vote should count. That is democracy.
Together we can demand every San Francisco child has a quality education and fight together to give all of our schools the resources they need.
VOTE NO ON THE RECALL OF ALISON COLLINS and NO ON ALL SCHOOL BOARD RECALLS
NoSchoolBoardRecall.org
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: No on Recalls of School Board Commissioners Lopez, Collins and Moliga.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Samantha Murphy, 2. Martin MacKerel, 3. Darcie Bell.
Paid Argument AGAINST Proposition A
The San Francisco Berniecrats and the San Francisco Latinx Democratic Club unequivocally oppose the Board of Education recalls against Commissioner Alison Collins.
The SF Berniecrats and the SF Latinx Democratic Club oppose undemocratic and frivolous recalls that cost the school district and voters money unnecessarily, especially when the proponents of the recall are funded with VC money. Elections matter, and the electoral process has been abused by millionaires paying $1.2 million to gather 50k signatures, allowing the affluent minority to overrule the will of the voters. There is an election in November, the voters have the right to decide then without the influence of appointed representatives having an unfair advantage. Let the voters decide!
San Francisco Berniecrats
San Francisco Latinx Democratic Club
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: San Francisco Berniecrats.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Brandee Marckmann, 2. Brett Wilkins, 3. Brandon Harami.
Paid Argument AGAINST Proposition A
Join the educators of San Francisco in voting NO on the recall of School Board Commissioner Alison Collins.
Because we care for our students and love our communities, UESF stands against the BOE recalls. With everything we are facing in education this year, our students need resources, not recalls. If Collins is recalled, voters have no say in her replacement. The mayoral appointee could be a proponent of privatization and/or charter schools which do not serve all students like public schools do. An independent AND elected school board serves the interests of students and educators in defending and strengthening public education.
Recall proponents claim a grassroots effort but they are backed by hundreds of thousands of dollars from conservatives and Trump supporters like David Sacks and Arthur Rock. Without the funding from these sources, they would not have been successful in collecting signatures to trigger this recall election.
Join teachers, workers, parents, city politicians, labor organizations, community groups and many others in VOTING NO on the recall of Alison Collins.
United Educators of San Francisco
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: UESF Candidates PAC.
Paid Argument AGAINST Proposition A
Democrats, VOTE NO on the recall
Follow the money. Recalls are a Republican strategy to overturn fair democratic elections, and they are coming for our schools. 200+ school board officials across the nation are being targeted as part of a dangerous movement. Republicans know they cannot win in normal elections, but fewer San Franciscans vote in recalls and that gives them a chance.
Recalls are a waste of money especially when the regular election is just months away! It's simple: if we don't like the actions of our representatives, we vote them out. San Franciscans disagree on a lot of things, but we agree on maintaining an open democratic process.
Focus on Facts
• 100% of schools are opened
• 0% COVID-related SFUSD student and teacher deaths
• 96% vaccinated SFUSD staff.
We do not always agree with the School Board, but we believe in elections not recalls.
VOTE NO RECALL
Winnie Porter
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: No School Board Recall.
The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. Melissa Daar, 2. Brandee Marckmann, 3. Sam Murphy.
Paid Argument AGAINST Proposition A
As an SFUSD parent and educator, I was elected to fight for equitable, inclusive and safe schools, and to ensure all students - not a select few - have access to a quality education. Over the last three years I have kept my promises to families.
When the global pandemic hit San Francisco, I and Board and District partners took extraordinary steps to keep our communities safe, support families, and continue instruction. We partnered with the community and private sector to distribute over 36,000 laptops and 15,000 hotspots to bridge the digital divide for every student that needed it. When our communities were experiencing food insecurity, we provided over one-million meals so no child went hungry.
We fought for clean air in every classroom, pushed for outdoor education, and took immediate action when we learned of potentially life-threatening conditions in one of our schools, Buena Vista - Horace Mann.
We never took a break. We did this in partnership with parents and educators, always centering our most vulnerable families. When some people wanted to rush reopening before staff said schools were ready, we said "NO!" It was our responsibility to keep families, and our city, SAFE. We have been doing the work we were elected to do.
Beyond the Covid 19 crisis, we enacted policies to involve youth in culturally responsive high school wellness programs. We became an Arts Equity District and made music instruction available to all elementary students, no matter their parent's income. We partnered with the Human Rights Commission to ensure all students PK - 12 see their culture reflected in the curriculum and their history celebrated in their schools.
This recall is an effort to silence your voice and overturn your success in electing educators and parents who are knowledgeable and committed to our public schools.
Make your VOICE heard. VOTE NO School Board Recalls!
(Learn more at: alisoncollinssf.com)
Alison Collins
The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Alison Collins.