Parcel Tax for San Francisco Unified School District

Shall the City replace its 2018 Parcel Tax for the San Francisco Unified School District with a new tax that changes the annual tax rate from $320 per parcel to $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year, and with an exemption for people age 65 or older, until June 30, 2038, for an estimated revenue of $48.1 million a year?

Digest by the Ballot Simplification Committee

The Way It Is Now: San Francisco Unified School District (School District) educates about 54,000 students a year and employs about 6,900 teachers.

In June 2018, a majority of San Francisco voters approved an annual parcel tax to provide funding to the School District (2018 School Parcel Tax). As of July 1, 2020, this tax rate is $320 per parcel of taxable property, with an adjustment for inflation each year. The 2018 School Parcel Tax expires on June 30, 2038.

The School District can use the money collected through this tax to:

• Increase salaries and benefits for teachers and other School District employees;

• Increase staffing and funding at high-needs schools and community schools;

• Provide professional development;

• Invest in technology, including digital learning; and

• Fund public charter schools.

People age 65 or older before July 1 of the tax year are exempt from this tax if they own an interest in the property being taxed and if the property is where they live most of the time.

The 2018 School Parcel Tax has been challenged in court, and the money collected through this tax may or may not be available to the School District.

The Proposal: Proposition J would replace the 2018 School Parcel Tax, which was approved by a majority of voters, with a new parcel tax that needs the approval of two-thirds of voters.

Beginning on July 1, 2021, Proposition J would change the tax rate to $288 per parcel of taxable property. This tax would be adjusted for inflation each year and would expire on June 30, 2038.

People age 65 or older before July 1 of the tax year would be exempt from this tax if they own an interest in the property being taxed and if the property is where they live most of the time.

The School District could use the money collected through this tax for the same purposes as the 2018 School Parcel Tax.

A "YES" Vote Means: If you vote "yes," beginning on July 1, 2021, you want the City to replace the 2018 School Parcel Tax with a new tax that changes the annual tax rate from $320 per parcel to $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year and with an exemption for people age 65 or older.

A "NO" Vote Means: If you vote "no," you do not want to make this change.

Controller's Statement on "J"

City Controller Ben Rosenfield has issued the following statement on the fiscal impact of Proposition J:

Should the proposed measure be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would generate tax revenues of approximately $48.1 million annually. Similar to the tax it would be replacing, the funds generated would be dedicated for teacher salaries, staffing and other purposes of the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) as specified in the measure.

The proposed measure sunsets the annual parcel tax on real property in San Francisco approved by the voters in June 2018 (Measure G), that as of July 1, 2021 would be $320 per parcel, and replaces it with a parcel tax of $288. The validity of the existing tax has been challenged in court and revenues have been reserved in the event the City loses the lawsuit and must refund taxpayers. The proposed tax would increase over time as the per parcel rate is adjusted for inflation and would be effective July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2038.

How "J" Got on the Ballot

On June 16, 2020, the Department of Elections received a proposed ordinance signed by Mayor Breed.

The Municipal Elections Code allows the Mayor to place an ordinance on the ballot in this manner.

This measure requires 66⅔% affirmative votes to pass.

The above statement is an impartial analysis of this measure. Some of the words used in the ballot digest are explained in Words you need to know >.

Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition J

Vote YES vote on Proposition J to Protect San Francisco's Schools

Our City faces unprecedented challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and budget shortfalls that severely hurt our City's schools. These issues have been compounded by the need for new methods of distance learning and the precautions required to protect our children, teachers, and staff. Proposition J will replace the tax voters approved in 2018, allowing the school district access to much-needed funding. It will not increase taxes.

Funds from Prop J will be spent to improve teacher salaries and modernize our schools, investing in technology for digital learning that will be vital for education in the COVID-19 era. Prop J will ensure that our public-schools have the tools required to continue providing a safe, high-quality education during this pandemic.

Our teachers deserve to be paid a living wage, and our school district must be able to offer competitive compensation so that San Francisco can attract and retain quality educators. Today, many of our schools are understaffed because neighboring districts can offer higher salaries and lower cost of living.

Prop J will also fund professional development for teachers and staff, while strengthening computer science and technology programs so that our students are set up to excel in college and graduate ready to compete in the modern global economy.

Funds collected through Prop J will be spent entirely to improve the San Francisco Unified School District. None of the funds can be taken by the state or federal government and an oversight committee that institutes annual audits will ensure that all funds are spent as promised.

Join parents, teachers, business and technology leaders and working men and women voting YES on J. Kids in San Francisco deserve access to a great public education and teachers deserve to be paid a living wage.

Mayor London Breed

Board of Supervisors

United Educators of San Francisco

San Francisco Labor Council

Parents for Public Schools

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition J

No Rebuttal to the Proponent’s Argument In Favor of Proposition J Was Submitted

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Opponent's Argument Against Proposition J

VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION J - The Joke is on us!

Yet another unfair tax method is emblemized by the parcel tax, which if enacted, taxes all real estate parcels the same, whether it's the Salesforce building or a 2-bedroom house in the Mission.

While Prop J lowers this 2018 tax by $22/parcel, it doesn't correct the innate unfairness of taxing billion dollar downtown buildings the same as cottages.

Such parcel tax was allowed by City Hall to pass, not by 2/3rd of voters, but only by 50% plus one. Other opponents sued City Hall, so City Hall now requires a 2/3rd majority to pass Proposition J.

Don't give it to them! Vote NO!

San Francisco Taxpayers Association

Judge Quentin L. Kopp (Ret.).

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Rebuttal to Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition J

Proposition J will help attract and retain great teachers, so San Francisco's children can succeed.

Now, more than ever, we appreciate the value of our teachers. San Francisco teachers deserve to be paid a living wage, and our school district must compete to attract and retain quality educators in these uncertain times.

Prop J will continue an essential source of funding for San Francisco schools to improve and maintain academic programs in reading, writing, math, science and technology, and attract and retain high quality teachers at a time when it is most necessary.

Prop J will make sure every kid in every school across San Francisco has access to the highest quality teachers and the best educational programs regardless of the neighborhood they live in.

Prop J simply fixes a legal loophole to continue an essential source of funding for San Francisco schools WITHOUT INCREASING TAXES. By voting yes, we ensure that funding for teachers and classrooms does not get taken away at a time when it is most necessary.

An independent Oversight Committee will ensure all funds are spent appropriately.

We are at high risk of losing our dedicated teachers, who work tirelessly to support our kids, and were already struggling to make ends meet prior to the pandemic. It's high time our teachers receive a raise that will help our schools attract and retain quality educators and reduce the District's teacher shortage.

Vote YES on Prop J to help San Francisco students thrive.

Learn more at supportsfschools.com

Strengthen our City by supporting our teachers and kids. Vote YES on Proposition J.

San Francisco Board of Education

United Educators of San Francisco

United Administrators of San Francisco

San Francisco Labor Council

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition J

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Our educators need a living wage more than ever before. In a time of crisis, we must make sure every child can receive a high-quality education. Prop J will ensure our schools continue to thrive beyond this pandemic and ensure our school district can offer competitive salaries.

Our teachers are being asked to do the impossible right now by implementing remote learning for thousands of children. Every day, they're working to make sure the pandemic doesn't get in the way of our kids' dreams - they deserve better pay now, more than ever. Vote Yes on Prop J to attract and retain our best educators.

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer

Supervisor Catherine Stefani

Supervisor Aaron Peskin

Supervisor Gordon Mar

Supervisor Dean Preston

Supervisor Matt Haney

Supervisor Norman Yee

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman

Supervisor Hillary Ronen

Supervisor Shamann Walton

Supervisor Ahsha Safai

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Vote Yes on J. The Democratic Party will always stand with teachers. We believe in a strong public education system that works for all children and helps those that need it most. Proposition J will ensure every child continues to have access to the highest quality teachers. Join the San Francisco Democratic Party in supporting Yes on J.

Democratic Party Chair David Campos

Democratic Party Member Anabel Ibanez

Democratic Party Member Bevan Dufty

Democratic Party Member Faauuga Moliga

Democratic Party Member Jane Kim

Democratic Party Member Keith Baraka

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

It's vital that we continue to provide the best learning opportunities for all students during the pandemic. Teachers are at the core of ensuring that our children can continue to receive a quality education, and it's only right to compensate them fairly for going above and beyond during these trying times.

Many of our schools were already understaffed prior to the pandemic because neighboring districts can offer higher salaries and lower costs of living. Creating a stable source of funding for our educators is critical to ensuring our school district can weather this financial crisis and continue providing high-quality education for every child in San Francisco. Vote Yes on J.

San Francisco United School District Board of Education

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

History has shown that when communities invest in good jobs, everyone benefits. Let's do what's right by hardworking teachers. Our dedicated teachers deserve to be paid a living wage, especially now when they are struggling to survive this financial crisis while continuing to teach remotely. Vote Yes on J.

San Francisco Labor Council

United Educators of San Francisco

United Administrators of San Francisco

San Francisco Building Trades Council

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Vote Yes on J!. We are doing our utmost to provide innovative, high-quality distance learning within our remote classrooms and support our students in every way possible during these uncertain times.

We can't afford to lose passionate educators because of the pandemic and the affordability crisis. Enough is enough. Teachers need a living wage to continue working in SF. Proposition J will ensure San Francisco schools can retain and recruit our strongest teachers. Yes on J!

Leslie Hu, SFUSD Teacher

Rebecca Fedorko, SFUSD Teacher

Michelle Camp, SFUSD Teacher

Katherine Melvin, SFUSD Teacher

Carolyn Samoa, SFUSD Teacher

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

As parents, we know that great teachers are the foundation of our children's success. Proposition J will make sure our kids continue to receive the best education by giving schools the critical funding to retain our high-quality teachers, especially during this economic crisis. Vote Yes on J.

Parents for Public Schools

SF Families Union

Coleman Advocates

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Great teachers are the key to world-class schools. That is why we urge voters to vote Yes on Proposition J. We need high-quality teachers to have the best academic programs in reading, writing, social studies, math and science. Proposition J will provide the financial resources needed to support and retain the best teachers beyond this crisis. Vote Yes on J.

Assemblymember David Chiu

Assemblymember Phil Ting

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer

Supervisor Gordon Mar

Supervisor Norman Yee

Board of Education Member Jenny Lam

DCCC Member Jane Kim

Chun Yun Li, SFUSD Family Liaison

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Everyone agrees a child's chances of getting a good teacher should not depend on their ZIP code. Prop J will ensure all children in all schools have access to great teachers and great academic programs, regardless of where they live. Join Black community leaders to ensure every child has equal access to opportunity by voting Yes on J.

Mayor London Breed

Supervisor Shamann Walton

Fmr. Supervisor Sophie Maxwell

Board of Education Commissioner Stevon Cook

Board of Education Commissioner Alison Collins

Democratic Party Vice Chair Keith Baraka

Democratic Party Vice Chair Honey Mahogany

Police Commission Commissioner Dionjay Brookter

Firefighters Local 798 President Shon Buford

VP for Paraeducators, United Educators of San Francisco Carolyn Samoa

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Latinx leaders support Prop J. Children in our communities deserve access to a great education and good schools, especially for students who need additional support with bilingual education. San Francisco teachers are the bedrock of our communities and we're proud to stand with them. Vote Yes on J.

Fmr. Supervisor John Avalos

Board of Education President Mark Sanchez

Board of Education Commissioner Gabriela Lopez

Democratic Party Chair David Campos

Democratic Party Member Anabel Ibañez

Latino Task Force Co-Chair Tracy Gallardo

SF Latino Democratic Club PAC Chair Gabriel Medina

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition J

San Francisco educators have pioneered the best support systems for LGBTQ youth so they have a safe place to learn and thrive. We are proud to support the dedicated SF educators who are crucial to children's success. Vote Yes on J.

Senator Scott Wiener

Fmr. Assemblymember Tom Ammiano

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman

BART Board Member Bevan Dufty

Democratic Party Chair David Campos

Board of Education President Mark Sanchez

Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Support Our Schools Committee.

The three largest contributors to the true source recipient committee: 1. UESF Committee on Political Education,
2. Marc Benioff, 3. Philip Halperin.

End of Paid Arguments IN FAVOR of Proposition J

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Paid Arguments Against Proposition J

No Paid Arguments AGAINST Proposition J Were Submitted

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.

Legal Text

Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code and Administrative Code to repeal the annual parcel tax in the Living Wage for Educators Act of 2018 (the “Act”) that, as of July 1, 2021, will be $320 plus a one-year consumer price index adjustment (and subject to future annual consumer price index adjustments), and replace it on July 1, 2021 with a $288 annual parcel tax (also subject to future annual consumer price index adjustments) to be spent, as under the Act, by the San Francisco Unified School District for purposes related to educators’ compensation and educational improvements; and increasing the City’s appropriations limit by the amount collected under the new tax for four years from November 3, 2020.

NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain font.

Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font.

Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font.

Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code subsections or parts of tables.

Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco:

Section 1. Pursuant to Articles XIII A and XIII C of the Constitution of the State of California, this ordinance shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the City and County of San Francisco at the November 3, 2020, consolidated general election.

Section 2. The Business and Tax Regulations Code is hereby amended by deleting Article 16, consisting of Sections 1601 through 1609, as follows:

Article 16. Living Wage for Educators Parcel Tax

Section 1601. Title.

This Article shall be known and may be cited as “Living Wage for Educators Act of 2018” (hereinafter the “Act”).

Section 1602. Necessity and Authority.

A. The People of the City and County of San Francisco (hereinafter “the City”) have determined that:

1. A parcel tax is necessary to attract and retain quality teachers and staff within the San Francisco Unified School District (hereinafter the “School District”).

2. The Bay Area is one of the most expensive places to live in the country. Skyrocketing rents and the Bay Area’s affordability crisis have made it difficult for San Francisco teachers to make ends meet and nearly impossible for them to live in the City.

3. Great teachers are at the center of student achievement. San Francisco schools need the resources to employ great teachers, so every student has the opportunity to thrive.

4. In recent years, the School District has recently hired more than 500 teachers annually, but still has a teacher shortage. This measure will allow the School District to not only train and retain the best teachers but also recruit new high-quality teachers.

5. California schools have suffered from consistent underfunding. The state ranks 42nd in per-pupil spending across the nation. San Francisco can do something about that by supporting local programs that will prepare the City’s students for college and 21st century jobs. All of the revenue from this measure will be spent right here in San Francisco public schools and cannot be taken away by the State.

B. This Article and the special tax authorized herein are adopted pursuant to Section 1.101 and other applicable provisions of the Charter, and Article XI sections 5 and 6 of the California Constitution.

Section 1603. Imposition.

A. A special non-ad valorem parcel tax (hereinafter the “Parcel Tax”) is hereby established and shall be levied annually on the owner of each parcel of taxable real property within the City, unless the owner is by law exempt from taxation, in which case, the Parcel Tax shall be assessed to the holder of the possessory interest in such parcel, unless such holder is also by law exempt from taxation. The Parcel Tax is an excise tax on the use of property within the City.

B. The Parcel Tax shall hereby be established and levied each year, commencing July 1, 2018, on each parcel of taxable real property, improved or unimproved, within the boundaries of the City at the rate of two hundred and ninety-eight dollars ($298.00) per year per parcel, and adjusting for inflation each year thereafter by the San Francisco All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as reported by the United States Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

C. For the purposes of this Article, a “parcel of taxable real property” shall be defined as any unit of real property in the City which receives a separate tax bill for ad valorem property taxes from the City’s Office of the Treasurer and Tax Collector (hereinafter the “Tax Collector”).

D. The collection of the Parcel Tax shall commence July 1, 2018 and expire June 30, 2038.

E. All property that the Tax Collector has determined to be otherwise exempt from property taxes, or on which no ad valorem property taxes have been levied, in any year shall also be exempt from the Parcel Tax in such year. The Tax Collector’s determination of exemption or relief for any reason of any parcel from taxation, other than the Senior Citizen Exemption or Unit Owner Parking Space Exemption, shall be final on the taxpayer for purposes of the Act. Taxpayers desiring to challenge the Tax Collector’s determination should do so under the procedures established by the Tax Collector’s Office, applicable provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code or other applicable law. Taxpayers seeking any refund of taxes paid pursuant to the Act shall follow the procedures applicable to tax refunds pursuant to the California Revenue and Taxation Code.

F. An optional exemption (heretofore the “Senior Citizen Exemption”) from the Parcel Tax will be made available annually to each individual in the City who attains 65 years of age prior to July 1 of the tax year, and who owns a beneficial interest in the parcel, and who uses that parcel as his or her principal place of residence, and who applies to the City on or before July 1 of each tax year, or during the first year of the tax at a date to be determined by the Tax Collector. Any application for such exemption must be submitted to the Tax Collector, pursuant to any rules and regulations of the Tax Collector, and must be renewed annually.

G. An optional exemption (heretofore the “Unit Owner Parking Space Exemption”) from the Parcel Tax will be made available annually to each owner of a parcel of taxable real property which (1) is classified as a “parking space” by the City and County of San Francisco’s Assessor-Recorder’s Office, (2) is contiguous to an exempt residential parcel, and (3) includes shared ownership between both the parking space parcel and exempt residential parcel. Parcels of taxable real property which are considered parking lots or other commercial spaces shall not be exempted under this section. Any application for such exemption must be submitted to the Tax Collector, pursuant to any rules and regulations of the Tax Collector, and must be renewed annually.

Section 1604. Levy, Collection and Purpose.

A. The proceeds of the Parcel Tax shall be deposited into a special fund, maintained by the City, which proceeds, together with any interest and any penalties thereon, collected each fiscal year shall be used solely for the purposes set forth in this section. The proceeds from the Parcel Tax shall be expended only for these purposes.

B. The City shall transfer all money deposited into the special fund to the School District for the purposes set forth in this section. The School District shall use these proceeds only for these purposes.

C. The proceeds collected by the levy of the Parcel Tax shall be used to:

1. Raise the salary of teachers so the School District can compete with other school districts in recruiting and retaining qualified and prepared teachers to support student achievement;

2. Raise the salary of paraeducators so the School District can better support individualized learning;

3. Increase staffing and supports at high-needs schools;

4. Increase staffing and program funding at Community Schools;

5. Provide additional professional development to all teachers and paraeducators;

6. Provide more competitive compensation and/or benefits to other School District personnel;

7. Invest in 21st century technology, including providing support for digital teaching and learning tools for students, educators and families;

8. Allocate funds to public charter schools in the City; and

9. Provide oversight to make sure the proceeds from the Parcel Tax are only spent for the purposes approved by voters.

D. The purposes set forth in this section shall constitute the specific purposes of the Act, which are specific and legally binding limitations on how the proceeds of the tax can be spent. The proceeds of the Parcel Tax shall be used only for such purposes and shall not fund any program or project other than those set forth herein.

E. The City shall, with every disbursement made pursuant to this Article, require the District to verify in writing that it will use the funds only for the purposes set forth in this section.

F. The Parcel Tax shall be collected by the Tax Collector at the same time and in the same manner and shall be subject to the same penalties as ad valorem property taxes collected by the Tax Collector.

Section 1605. Controller’s Report.

The City’s Office of the Controller (hereinafter the “Controller”) shall prepare a report on at least an annual basis which shows the amount of funds collected and expended, and the status of any project required or authorized to be funded, by the Parcel Tax. The Controller shall file each report with the Mayor, Board of Supervisors and the oversight committee referenced in this Article.

Section 1606. Supplement to Existing School District Funding.

A. The People of the City and County of San Francisco find and declare that major urban school districts such as San Francisco serve an ethnically and economically diverse student population which requires more resources than currently provided. In adopting this Parcel Tax, the people of San Francisco choose to provide additional City resources to complement, and not supplant, City, State, Federal and other funding for the School District.

B. Consistent with subsection (A), the People of the City and County of San Francisco specifically find that their contributions to and disbursements from the special fund authorized by this Article are discretionary expenditures by the City for the direct benefit of the children of San Francisco, their families, and the community at large. In the event that the State attempts, directly or indirectly, to redistribute these expenditures to other jurisdictions or to offset or reduce State or Federal funding to the School District because of the contributions to and disbursements from the special fund authorized by this Article, the City shall transfer said monies that would otherwise be distributed to the School District each year from the special fund to the City’s Children’s Fund established in Charter section 16.108, or such other fund as the Board of Supervisors may designate, to be spent for purposes which are substantially equivalent to the purposes set forth in this Article.

C. This Parcel Tax is intended to be in addition to and not to replace any other monies provided by the City to the School District, including but not limited to the Public Education Enrichment Fund (hereinafter “PEEF”). This Article does not authorize a reduction in disbursements from the City to PEEF.

Section 1607. Increase in Appropriations Limit.

To the extent that the revenue from the Parcel Tax is in excess of the spending limit for the City, as provided for in applicable provisions of the California Constitution and state law, the approval of the Act by the voters shall constitute approval to increase the City’s spending limit in an amount equal to the revenue derived from the Parcel Tax for the maximum period of time as allowed by law.

Section. 1608. Oversight.

The oversight committee created pursuant to Proposition A on the June 2008 San Francisco ballot shall, starting with the Act’s first operative year, submit a report on at least an annual basis to the Mayor, Board of Supervisors and Board of Education evaluating whether the proceeds from the Act are being properly expended for the purposes set forth in the Act. If this body is unwilling or unable to perform this function for any reason, then the City shall establish an oversight committee to submit a report on at least an annual basis to the Mayor, Board of Supervisors and Board of Education evaluating whether the proceeds from the Act are being properly expended for the purposes set forth in the Act.

Section. 1609. Severability.

If any provision of this Article, or section or part thereof, or the applicability of any provision, section or part to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions, sections and parts shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions, sections and parts of this Article are severable. The voters hereby declare that this Article, and each section, provision and part, would have been adopted irrespective of whether any one or more provisions, sections or parts are found to be invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 3. The Business and Tax Regulations Code is hereby amended by adding Article 37, consisting of Sections 3701 through 3714, to read as follows:

ARTICLE 37: FAIR WAGES FOR EDUCATORS PARCEL TAX ORDINANCE

SEC. 3701. SHORT TITLE.

This Article 37 shall be known as the “Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax Ordinance,” and the tax it imposes shall be known as the “Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax.”

SEC. 3702. DEFINITIONS

For purposes of this Article 37, the following definitions shall apply:

“Assessor” means the Assessor-Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco, or the Assessor-Recorder’s designee.

“City” means the City and County of San Francisco.

“Controller” means the Controller of the City and County of San Francisco, or the Controller’s designee.

“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30.

“Parcel” has the meaning set forth in Section 3703.

“School District” means the San Francisco Unified School District.

“Tax” means the Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax imposed by this Article 37.

“Tax Collector” means the Tax Collector of the City and County of San Francisco, or the Tax Collector’s designee.

SEC. 3703. PARCEL.

(a) “Parcel” means a unit of real estate, except a possessory interest, in the City with an Assessor’s parcel number as shown on the most current official assessment roll of the Assessor on July 1 of the Fiscal Year for which the Tax is imposed. However, both of the following conditions shall apply:

(1) A Parcel created by a subdivision map approved in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7 of the California Government Code) shall be deemed to be a single assessment unit and shall not be deemed, on the basis of multiple Assessor’s parcel numbers assigned by the Assessor, to constitute multiple assessment units.

(2) A Parcel that has not been subdivided in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410) of Title 7 of the California Government Code) may be deemed to constitute a separate assessment unit only to the extent that the Parcel has been previously described and conveyed in one or more deeds separating it from all adjoining property.

(b) If the Parcel identified pursuant to subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2) is not consistent with the property’s identification by Assessor’s parcel number, it shall be the responsibility of the Parcel owner to provide the Tax Collector with written notice of the correct Assessor’s parcel number of taxable Parcels pursuant to this Section 3703 within 90 days after the date of the initial tax bill containing the Tax.

SEC. 3704. IMPOSITION.

(a) Unless otherwise provided in this Article 37, on July 1 of each Fiscal Year there is hereby imposed an annual Tax of $288 on each Parcel in the City for the purposes described in Section 3709.

(b) Commencing with Fiscal Year 2022-2023, the Tax rate shall be adjusted annually in accordance with the San Francisco All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics.

(c) The Tax shall take effect on July 1, 2021 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, and shall continue in effect for each Fiscal Year thereafter until June 30, 2038, after which date it shall expire by operation of law.

SEC. 3705. EXEMPTIONS.

(a) The following Parcels shall be exempt from the Tax:

(1) Parcels on which no ad valorem property tax is levied for the Fiscal Year; and

(2) Parcels in which an individual who is 65 years of age or older before July 1 of the Fiscal Year owns a beneficial interest, where such homeowner occupies the Parcel as the homeowner’s principal residence.

(b) To claim an exemption from the Tax under subsection (a)(2), the owner must submit an application to the Tax Collector by the deadline set by the Tax Collector. The application shall be accompanied by such evidence as the Tax Collector deems necessary to determine eligibility for the exemption. The Tax Collector shall prepare forms for this purpose. Exemptions granted under subsection (a)(2) shall be automatically renewed in subsequent Fiscal Years absent a change in a material fact. Owners of Parcels receiving an exemption under subsection (a)(2) must notify the Tax Collector if the Parcel no longer qualifies for the exemption.

SEC. 3706. COLLECTION.

(a) The Tax shall be collected by the City in two approximately equal installments in the same manner and on the same dates as established by law for the collection of ad valorem property taxes. The collection of the Tax shall be subject to the regulations and procedures governing the collection of ad valorem property taxes by the City, including, without limitation, the imposition of penalties, fees, and interest on the failure to remit or the delinquent remittance of the Tax, and refunds of Taxes, penalties, fees, and interest.

(b) The Tax Collector is charged with the responsibility of overseeing the collection and receipt of the proceeds of the Tax.

SEC. 3707. REGULATIONS.

The Tax Collector is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations to implement this Article 37.

SEC. 3708. DEPOSIT OF MONEYS COLLECTED.

All monies collected under this Article 37 shall be deposited to the credit of the Fair Wages for Educators Fund, established in Administrative Code Section 10.100-72, which shall be a category four fund under Administrative Code Section 10.100-1. The Fund shall be maintained separate and apart from all other City funds and shall be subject to appropriation. Any balance remaining in the Fund at the close of any Fiscal Year shall be deemed to have been provided for a special purpose within the meaning of Charter Section 9.113(a) and shall be carried forward and accumulated in the Fund for the purposes described in Section 3709.

SEC. 3709. EXPENDITURE OF PROCEEDS.

(a) Subject to the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter, monies in the Fair Wages for Educators Fund shall be appropriated on an annual or supplemental basis and used exclusively for the following purposes:

(1) Up to 1% of the proceeds of the Tax, in any proportion, to the Tax Collector and other City Departments, for administration of the Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax and administration of the Fair Wages for Educators Fund.

(2) Refunds of any overpayments of the Tax, including any related penalties, interest, and fees.

(3) All remaining amounts to be transferred to the School District, which shall use these proceeds only for the following purposes, with the School District having sole discretion as to allocation of the proceeds among any or all of these purposes:

(A) Raising the salaries of teachers so the School District can compete with other school districts in recruiting and retaining qualified and prepared teachers to support student achievement;

(B) Raising the salaries of paraeducators so the School District can better support individualized learning;

(C) Increasing staffing and support at high-needs schools;

(D) Increasing staffing and program funding at Community Schools;

(E) Providing additional professional development to all teachers and paraeducators;

(F) Providing more competitive compensation and/or benefits to other School District personnel;

(G) Investing in 21st century technology, including providing support for digital teaching and learning tools for students, educators, and their families;

(H) Allocating funds to public charter schools in the City; and

(I) Providing oversight to ensure the proceeds from the Tax are spent only for the purposes described in this subsection (a).

(b) The Controller shall, with every disbursement made to the School District pursuant to this Article 37, require the School District to verify in writing that it will use the funds only for the purposes set forth in subsection (a)(3).

(c) Commencing with a report filed no later than February 15, 2023, covering the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2022, the Controller shall file annually with the Board of Supervisors, by February 15 of each year, a report containing the amount of monies collected in and expended from the Fair Wages for Educators Fund during the prior Fiscal Year, the status of any project required or authorized to be funded by this Section 3709, and such other information as the Controller, in the Controller’s sole discretion, shall deem relevant to the operation of this Article 37.

SEC. 3710. SUPPLEMENT TO EXISTING SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDING.

(a) The People of the City and County of San Francisco find and declare that major urban school districts such as San Francisco’s serve an ethnically and economically diverse student population that requires more resources than currently provided. In adopting this Tax, the People of the City and County of San Francisco choose to provide additional City resources to complement, and not supplant, City, State, Federal and other funding for the School District.

(b) Consistent with subsection (a), the People of the City and County of San Francisco find that the contributions to and disbursements from the Fair Wages for Educators Fund are discretionary expenditures by the City for the direct benefit of the children of the City, their families, and the community at large. In the event that the State attempts, directly or indirectly, to redistribute these expenditures to other jurisdictions or to offset or reduce State or Federal funding to the School District because of the contributions to and disbursements from the Fair Wages for Educators Fund, the City shall transfer monies that would otherwise be distributed to the School District each year from the Fair Wages for Educators Fund to the City’s Children and Youth Fund established in Charter Section 16.108, or such other fund as the Board of Supervisors may designate, to be spent for purposes which are substantially equivalent to the purposes set forth in Section 3709(a)(3).

(c) The Tax is intended to be in addition to and not to replace any other monies provided by the City to the School District, including but not limited to the Public Education Enrichment Fund (“PEEF”). This Article 37 does not authorize a reduction in disbursements from the City to PEEF.

SEC. 3711. OVERSIGHT.

The independent oversight committee appointed by the School District’s Board of Education pursuant to Proposition A on the June 3, 2008 San Francisco ballot shall, starting with Fiscal Year 2021-2022, submit a report on at least an annual basis to the Mayor, Board of Supervisors, and Board of Education evaluating whether the proceeds from the Tax are being properly expended for the purposes set forth in Section 3709(a)(3). If that oversight committee is unwilling or unable to perform this function for any reason, then the City may establish an oversight committee to submit a report on at least an annual basis to the Mayor, Board of Supervisors, and the Board of Education evaluating whether the proceeds from the Tax are being properly expended for the purposes set forth in Section 3709(a)(3).

SEC. 3712. AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE.

The Board of Supervisors may amend or repeal this Article 37 by ordinance by a two-thirds vote and without a vote of the people except as limited by Articles XIII A and XIII C of the California Constitution.

SEC. 3713. SEVERABILITY.

(a) Except as provided in Section 3713(b), if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Article 37, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Article. The People of the City and County of San Francisco hereby declare that, except as provided in Section 3713(b), they would have adopted this Article 37 and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of this Article or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

(b) If the imposition of the Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax in Section 3704 is held in its entirety to be facially invalid or unconstitutional in a final judicial decision, the remainder of this Article 37 shall be void and of no force and effect, and the City Attorney shall cause it to be removed from the Business and Tax Regulations Code.

SEC. 3714. SAVINGS CLAUSE.

No section, clause, part, or provision of this Article 37 shall be construed as requiring the payment of any Tax that would be in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of the Constitution or laws of the State of California.

Section 4. Chapter 10 of the Administrative Code is hereby amended by adding Section 10.100-72 to Article XIII, to read as follows:

SEC. 10.100-72. Fair Wages FOR EDUCATORS FUND.

(a) Establishment of Fund. The Fair Wages for Educators Fund (“Fund”) is established as a category four fund as defined in Section 10.100-1 of the Administrative Code, and shall receive all taxes, penalties, interest, and fees collected from the Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax imposed under Article 37 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code.

(b) Use of Fund. Subject to the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter, monies in the Fund shall be used exclusively for the purposes described in Section 3709 of Article 37 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code.

(c) Administration of Fund. As stated in Section 3709(c) of Article 37 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, commencing with a report filed no later than February 15, 2023, covering the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, the Controller shall file annually with the Board of Supervisors, by February 15 of each year, a report containing the amount of monies collected in and expended from the Fund during the prior fiscal year, the status of any project required or authorized to be funded by Section 3709, and such other information as the Controller, in the Controller’s sole discretion, deems relevant to the operation of Article 37.

Section 5. Appropriations Limit Increase. Pursuant to California Constitution Article XIII B and applicable laws, for four years from November 3, 2020, the appropriations limit for the City shall be increased by the aggregate sum collected by the levy of the tax imposed under Section 3 of this ordinance.

Section 6. Scope of Ordinance. In enacting this ordinance, the People of the City and County of San Francisco intend to amend only those words, phrases, paragraphs, subsections, sections, articles, numbers, punctuation marks, charts, diagrams, or any other constituent parts of the Municipal Code that are explicitly shown in this ordinance as additions or deletions, in accordance with the “Note” that appears under the official title of the ordinance.

Section 7. The Fair Wages for Educators Parcel Tax Ordinance contained in Section 3 of this measure is submitted to the qualified electors of the City pursuant to Article XIII A, Section 4 of the California Constitution, and must pass by a two-thirds vote. If this measure does not pass by a two-thirds vote, the entire measure shall be void and shall have no effect.

Section 8. No Conflict with Federal or State Law. Nothing in this measure shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or state law.

Section 9. Effective Date. The effective date of this ordinance shall be July 1, 2021.

* * *