Jump to navigation

  • Site guide
  • Font size
  • Text only
Mobile menu button
San Francisco Voter Guide logo
Online EditionSan Francisco Voter Information Pamphlet & Sample BallotConsolidated Statewide Direct Primary Election
June 7, 2022

Elections and accessibility

  • sfelections.org
  • Accessibility
  • English
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Filipino
  • General Information
    • Quick Guide to the June 7, 2022 Election
      • Questions?
      • Letter from the Director
      • Overview of Official Voter Information Resources
      • The Ballot Simplification Committee
      • Elections Commission
      • New Voting District Lines in 2022
      • Voting Options
      • Map and Locations of Official Ballot Drop Boxes in San Francisco
      • Voter Bill of Rights
      • Accessible Voting and Services
      • Multilingual Voter Services
      • 我們可以協助您!
      • Asistencia en español para los electores
      • Tulong para sa botante sa wikang Filipino
      • ကျွန်ုပ်တို့ သင့်ကို ကူညီနိုင်ပါသည်။
      • お手伝いいたします。
      • 도와 드리겠습니다!
      • เราช่วยคุณได้!
      • Chúng tôi có thể trợ giúp quý vị!
      • June 7, 2022 Election Ballot
      • Marking Your Ballot
      • Frequently Asked Questions about Registration and Voting in San Francisco
      • Information About Prohibited Election Activities
      • Key Facts about the City’s Voting System
      • Keep Your Voter Registration Current!
      • Voter Registration Privacy Information
      • Safe at Home Program
      • Important Reminders!
      • Stop receiving your printed Voter Information Pamphlet
      • Volunteer! Be a Poll Worker!
      • Find your Polling Place Location and Sample Ballot
      • XML Streams
      • Site Guide
      • Change Font Size
  • Candidate Information
    • Candidate Information
      • Voluntary Spending Limits
      • Party Endorsements of Candidates
      • City and County of San Francisco Office To Be Voted on in this Election
      • California Primary Election
      • Your Candidates' Statements
      All Candidate Statements
      所有候選人聲明
      Todas las declaraciones de las candidatos
      Lahat ng mga Pahayag ng mga Kandidato
    • Candidates for United States Representative, District 11
    • Candidates for United States Representative, District 15
    • Candidates for State Assembly, District 17
    • Candidates for State Assembly, District 19
    • Candidate for City Attorney
  • Local Ballot Measures
    • Local Ballot Measure and Argument Information
      • An Overview of San Francisco’s Debt
      • Words You Need to Know
      • Proposition A: Muni Reliability and Street Safety Bond
      • Proposition B: Building Inspection Commission
      • Proposition C: Recall Timelines and Vacancy Appointments
      • Proposition D: Office of Victim and Witness Rights; Legal Services for Domestic Violence Victims
      • Proposition E: Behested Payments
      • Proposition F: Refuse Collection and Disposal
      • Proposition G: Public Health Emergency Leave
      • Proposition H: Recall Measure Regarding Chesa Boudin

You are here

  1. Home ›
  2. Local Ballot Measures ›
B
Building Inspection Commission

Shall the City amend the Charter to change the appointment process and qualifications for Building Inspection Commission members and have the Mayor appoint the Director of the Department of Building Inspection? 

Digest by the Ballot Simplification Committee

The Way It Is Now: The Building Inspection Commission (BIC) oversees the Department of Building Inspection (DBI). The DBI is responsible for enforcing, administering and interpreting the City's Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing codes. The BIC has seven members, four appointed by the Mayor and three appointed by the President of the Board of Supervisors (Board President). The members serve two-year terms and must meet specific qualifications. 

The Mayor’s appointees must include: 

• a structural engineer; 

• a licensed architect; 

• a residential builder; and 

• a representative of a nonprofit housing developer. 

The Board President’s appointees must include: 

• a residential tenant; 

• a residential landlord; and 

• a member of the public. 

BIC appointees are not subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. The BIC has the sole authority to appoint and remove DBI’s Director. 

The Proposal: Proposition B is a Charter amendment that would change the appointment process for the Director of the Department of Building Inspection. The Building Inspection Commission would submit up to three candidates for Director, and the Mayor would make the appointment. 

Proposition B would also change requirements for BIC nominees. The terms of current members would end on July 1, 2023. After that date, the new qualifications would apply to anyone nominated by the Mayor or Board President to serve on the BIC. 

Of the Mayor’s nominees: 

• two must be either a structural engineer, an archi­tect or a residential builder; and 

• two do not have any required qualifications. 

Of the Board President’s nominees: 

• one must be either a residential tenant or a current or former employee of a nonprofit housing organi­zation; and 

• two do not have any required qualifications. 

All nominees would be subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors before they are appointed. 

A "YES" Vote Means: If you vote "yes," you want the Mayor to appoint the Director of the Department of Building Inspection, and to change the appointment process and qualifications for Building Inspection Commission members. 

A "NO" Vote Means: If you vote "no," you do not want to make these changes. 

Controller's Statement on "B" 

City Controller Ben Rosenfield has issued the follow­ing statement on the fiscal impact of Proposition B: 

Should the proposed Charter amendment be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would have a minimal impact on the cost of government. 

The Building Inspection Commission currently con­sists of seven members, with four appointed by the Mayor and three by the President of the Board of Supervisors. Each seat on the Commission is currently subject to specific professional qualifications. The amendment would provide instead that four members of the Commission be nominated by the Mayor and three by the President of the Board of Supervisors, with all members subject to a hearing process and approval by the Board of Supervisors. The require­ment of specific professional qualifications applied to each seat would be eliminated. 

Currently the Director of Building Inspection is appointed directly by the Commission. The amend­ment would provide instead that the Commission pro­vide three qualified candidates to the Mayor, and the Mayor would appoint the Director. 

The amendment makes other adjustments and updates to staff appointments and certain procedures of the Department of Building Inspection. These actions would have no significant cost effects and the Department of Building Inspection would remain sub­ject to the existing budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter. 

How "B" Got on the Ballot 

On February 15, 2022, the Board of Supervisors voted 11 to 0 to place Proposition B on the ballot. The Supervisors voted as follows: 

Yes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton. 

No: None.

 

This measure requires 50%+1 affirmative votes to pass.

Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition B

The San Francisco Department of Building Inspection and the Building Inspection Commission need reform. Today, if you need any kind of permit to build or reno­vate, you face an expensive and difficult process because the Department of Building Inspection is anti­quated, inefficient and bureaucratic. The current system has also allowed rampant corruption, leading to an extensive FBI investigation and multiple arrests. 

Proposition B will reform the Department of Building Inspection and the Building Inspection Commission to ensure more accountability and transparency, and make it easier to build and modify housing. 

Proposition B will change the structure of the Building Inspection Commission by removing designated industry seats and allow qualified members of the public to serve in these seats. Three of the seats on the Commission will require subject matter expertise qual­ifications. The Proposition will also require these commission appointments to go through a public hearing and confirmation process and give the mayor the power to hire and fire the director, providing greater accountability. 

Vote Yes on Proposition B to: 

• Streamline the permitting process so people can get renovation and building permits faster; 

• Reform governance of the department and commis­sion to reduce bureaucracy and bring it in line with other City Commissions; 

• Eliminate corruption in the department; and 

• Make it easier to build affordable housing in San Francisco 

Learn more at ReformSFGov.com 

Supervisor Myrna Melgar

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman 

Supervisor Aaron Peskin

Supervisor Catherine Stefani 

Supervisor Ahsha Safai 

Supervisor Shamann Walton 

Supervisor Hillary Ronen 

Supervisor Gordon Mar 

Supervisor Matt Haney

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
Rebuttal to Proponent’s Argument in Favor of Proposition B

No Rebuttal or Opponent’s Argument Against Proposition B Was Submitted

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
Paid Arguments in Favor of Proposition B

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B 

San Francisco Labor Council Supports Proposition B 

The San Francisco Labor Council represents 150 unions and more than 100,000 union members and their families. Our mission is to improve the lives of workers, their families, and our community. 

We urge you to vote Yes on Proposition B. This mea­sure will reform the Department of Building Inspection. This is critical to creating more housing opportunities and construction jobs. It will reduce corruption and increase transparency. It will give San Franciscans a voice on the Building Inspection Commission. Please vote Yes. 

San Francisco Labor Council 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties. 

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B 

Small Business Owners Say Reform DBI: Vote Yes on B 

Opening a small business in San Francisco is challeng­ing. The costly and lengthy process to get a building permit adds to these challenges. 

The Department of Building Inspection is bureaucratic and inefficient. The people serving on the Building Inspection Commission have been the same people applying for permits. The existing system has allowed rampant corruption, leading to an extensive FBI inves­tigation and multiple arrests. 

Proposition B will reform the Department of Building Inspection and the Building Inspection Commission. It will change the structure of the Building Inspection Commission by removing designated industry seats and instead allow qualified members of the public to serve in these seats. 

This is a key step to reforming the Department of Building Inspection and to helping small businesses. We urge you to vote Yes. 

Bernadette Melvin, Bernie’s Coffee Owner* 

Manny Yekutiel, Manny’s Cafe Owner* 

*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization. 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties. 

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B

Former Building Inspection Commissioner Supports Prop B 

As a former Building Inspection Commissioner, I know firsthand that the commission needs reform. 

Proposition B is a key step in fixing corruption and bureaucracy at the Department of Building Inspection. It will bring the Building Inspection Commission and the Department in line with other city departments in the way that the commissioners and directors are selected, appointed and confirmed. This will reduce corruption and bring more transparency and account­ability to the process. 

Join me and vote Yes on B to reform the Department of Building Inspection. 

Former Building Inspection Commissioner Debra Walker 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties. 

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B

Asian Leaders for Proposition B 

The current process for obtaining a building permit in San Francisco is extremely slow and costly. It’s stifling the development and renovation of housing, and hurts Asian homeowners in every neighborhood. 

It's time to reform the Department of Building Inspection to reduce corruption and increase transpar­ency and accountability. This is a key step in fixing the bureaucracy that is slowing down housing develop­ment in San Francisco. Vote Yes on Proposition B. 

Former President of the Board of Supervisors Norman Yee* 

Supervisor Gordon Mar* 

Former Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer* 

Former Democratic County Central Committee Chair Mary Jung* 

Former Democratic County Central Committee Member Jen Low* 

SF DCCC member Queena Chen* 

*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization. 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties.

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B

Democratic Party Leaders Urge Yes on Proposition B 

It’s time to reform the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection and Building Inspection Commission. 

Proposition B will reduce corruption and create more accountability and transparency over the Department. It will change how commissioners are appointed to the Building Inspection Commission by requiring a nomination and confirmation process for all nominees as part of the appointment process. Proposition B will ensure more accountability and transparency in our building permitting and inspection process. We urge you to vote Yes. 

Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club 

San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Vice Chair Leah LaCroix* 

San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Vice Chair Peter Gallotta* 

San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Member Keith Baraka* 

San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Member Rafael Mandelman* 

San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Member Hillary Ronen* 

Former San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee Member Jen Low* 

Anabell Ibanez 

Queena Chen 

*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization. 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties. 

Paid Argument IN FAVOR of Proposition B

Reform DBI to Help Our Neighborhoods 

If you have ever tried to get a permit from the Department of Building Inspection, you know it is bureaucratic and inefficient. For even minor modifica­tions to your home that are supported by your neigh­bors, it can be expensive and difficult to get the per­mits you need. Proposition B will bring the Department of Building Inspection in line with how other departments operate to increase accountability and reduce corruption. We support Proposition B. 

Jerry Dratler 

Ozzie Rohm, San Francisco Land Use Coalition* 

*For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization. 

The true source(s) of funds for the printing fee of this argument: Committee for Cleaner Government. 

The sole contributor to the true source recipient committee: Seven Hills Properties. 

 

End of Paid Arguments IN FAVOR of Proposition B

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
Paid Arguments Against Proposition B

No Paid Arguments AGAINST Proposition B Were Submitted

Arguments are the opinions of the authors and have not been checked for accuracy by any official agency. Arguments are published as submitted. Spelling and grammatical errors have not been corrected.
Legal Text

Describing and setting forth a proposal to the voters at an election to be held on June 7, 2022, to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to revise the duties, composition, and method of appointment for members of the Building Inspection Commission; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. 

Section 1.  The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this proposed Charter Amendment comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).  Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in File No. 211286 and is incorporated herein by reference.  The Board affirms this determination.  

Section 2.  The Board of Supervisors hereby submits to the qualified voters of the City and County, at an election to be held on June 7, 2022, a proposal to amend the Charter of the City and County by revising Section 4.121 and Appendix D, to read as follows:

NOTE:  Unchanged Charter text and uncodified text are in plain font.

             Additions are single-underline italics Times New Roman font.

             Deletions are strike-through italics Times New Roman font.

             Asterisks (*   *   *   *) indicate the omission of unchanged Charter subsections.

SEC. 4.121.  BUILDING INSPECTION COMMISSION.

   The Building Inspection Commission shall consist of seven members nominated and appointed pursuant to this Section 4.121 and with an emphasis on seeking to include members concerned with tenant safety and habitability issues. Four members shall be nominatedappointed by the Mayor for a term of two years. Three members shall be nominatedappointed by the President of the Board of Supervisors for a term of two years. Two of the four Mayoral appointments shall each have one or more of the following qualifications: be an active, formerly active, or retired structural engineer, architect, or residential builder. One of the three Board President appointments shall have one or more of the following qualifications: be a residential tenant or work or have worked for a non-profit housing organization.

Each nomination of the Mayor and the President of the Board of Supervisors is subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors, and shall be the subject of a public hearing and vote within 60 days. If the Board fails to act on the nomination within 60 days of the date the nomination is transmitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the nominee shall be deemed approved. The appointment shall become effective on the date the Board adopts a motion approving the nomination or after 60 days of the date the nomination is transmitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Members may be removed by the appointing officer only pursuant to Section 15.105. Vacancies occurring in the offices of appointive members, either during or at the expiration of a term, shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the appointment process specified in this paragraphfilled by the appointing officer.

The Building Inspection Commission shall have responsibility for oversight of the Department of Building Inspection, which shall have responsibility for the enforcement, administration, and interpretation of the San Francisco Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, except where this Charter specifically grants that power to another department.

The Commission shall oversee the inspection and regulation of additions, alterations, and repairs in all buildings and structures covered by the San Francisco Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. However, nothing in this Section 4.121 shall diminish or alter the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission or Department over changes of use or occupancy under the Planning Code. The Commission shall ensure the provision of minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and the public welfare by regulating and controlling the safe use of such buildings and structures. The Commission shall ensure the vigorous enforcement of City laws mandating the provision of heat and hot water to residential tenants. The Commission shall also ensure the enforcement of local, state, and federal disability access laws. The Commission shall exercise all the powers and duties of boards and commissions set forth in Sections 4.102, 4.103, and 4.104, and may take other actions as prescribed by ordinance. The members of the Commission shall serve without compensation.

The Commission shall adopt rules and regulations consistent with fulfilling its responsibilities under this Charter. The Commission shall also adopt rules and regulations governing Commission meetings and also adopt requirements for notification and mailing for Commission business. The Commission shall hold public hearings on all proposed amendments to the San Francisco Building Code, Electrical Code, Housing Code, Plumbing Code, and Mechanical Code.

The Commission shall constitute the Abatement Appeals Board, and shall assume all powers granted to this entity under this Charter and the San Francisco Building Code. The Commission shall appoint and may remove at its pleasure members of the Board of Examiners, Access Appeals Commission, and Code Advisory Committee, all of which shall have the powers and duties to the extent set forth in the San Francisco Building Code.

The Commission may reverse, affirm, or modify determinations made by the Department of Building Inspection on all permits required for a final certificate of completion. The Commission’s jurisdiction under this paragraph, however, shall not extend to permits appealable to the Planning Commission or Board of Appeals. Appeals of decisions within the Commission’s jurisdiction must be filed with the Commission within fifteen days of the challenged determination.  The Commission’s action shall be final.

   The four Mayoral appointments shall consist of a structural engineer, a licensed architect, a residential builder, and a representative of a community-based non-profit housing development corporation. The three Supervisorial appointments shall consist of a residential tenant, a residential landlord, and a member of the general public.

   Notwithstanding any other provision of the Charter, the Commission shall have the power to appoint and remove a department head.

APPENDIX D:

BUILDING INSPECTION PROVISIONS

D3.750  ESTABLISHMENT

   Recognizing that the provision of safe and sanitary buildings is essential to the welfare of the inhabitants of the City and County of San Francisco, there is hereby established a Department of Building Inspection which shall consist of a Building Inspection Commission, a Director of Building Inspection, and such employees as may be necessary to carry out the functions and duties of said department. The commission shall organize, reorganize, and manage the department. When the commission assumes management of the department, the Bureau of Building Inspection shall cease to exist. Unless modified or repealed by the commission, all orders, regulations, rules, and policies of the Bureau of Building Inspection will remain in effect. Except as limited below, positions in the Bureau of Building Inspection of the Department of Public Works legally authorized on the date the commission assumes management of the department shall be continued, and incumbents therein legally appointed thereto shall be continued as officers and employees of the department under the conditions governing their respective appointments.

D3.750-1.  COMMISSION; COMPOSITION.

The Department of Building Inspection shall be under the management of a Building Inspection Commission consisting of seven members. Four members shall be appointed by the mayor for a term of two years; provided that the respective terms of office of those first appointed shall be as follows: two for one year, and two for two years from the effective date of this section. Three members shall be appointed by the President of the Board of Supervisors for a term of two years; provided that the respective terms of office of those first appointed shall be as follows: three for one year from the effective date of this section. The initial appointments shall be made no later than fifteen days after the effective date of this section, and the commission’s management shall begin no later than forty-five days after the effective date of this section. Vacancies occurring in the offices of appointive members, either during or at expiration of term, shall be filled by the electoral office that made the appointment. The four mayoral appointments shall be comprised of a structural engineer, a licensed architect, a residential builder, and a representative of a community- based non-profit housing development corporation. The three Supervisorial appointments shall be comprised of a residential tenant, a residential landlord, and a member of the general public. The members of the commission shall serve without compensation.

   Pursuant to Government Code Section 87103, individuals appointed to the commission under this section are intended to represent and further the interest of the particular industries, trades, or professions specified herein. Accordingly, it is found that for purposes of persons who hold such office, the specified industries, trades, or professions are tantamount to and constitute the public generally within the meaning of Government Code Section 87103.

D3.750  AMENDMENT OF CHARTER PROVISIONS; TRANSITION

The amendments of Section 4.121 and of provisions of this Appendix D, adopted at the June 7, 2022 election, shall become operative on July 1, 2023; provided, however, that the new process for nominating and confirming members to the Building Inspection Commission, along with the change in qualifications for members accompanying that new process, as specified in Section 4.121 as amended, shall commence sufficiently in advance of July 1, 2023 such that members may be appointed under the new process and be prepared to assume office on that date.   

D3.750-1  TERMS OF OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTION COMMISSION

The terms of office of all members of the Commission who hold office as of July 1, 2023 shall expire at noon on that date, at which time the terms of office for members of the Commission appointed pursuant to the new process for nominating and confirming members as referenced in Section D3.750 shall commence. In order to stagger the terms, three members (appointees to Seats 3 and 4, as designated by the Mayor when nominated; and the appointee to Seat 7, as designated by the President of the Board of Supervisors when nominated) shall initially serve one-year terms, and four members (appointees to Seats 1 and 2, as designated by the Mayor when nominated; and appointees to Seats 5 and 6, as designated by the President of the Board of Supervisors when nominated) shall initially serve two-year terms.  All subsequent terms of office for all members of the Commission shall be two years.

D3.750-2  DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION; OTHER EXECUTIVES

   The Director of Building Inspection shall be the department head and appointing officer of the Department of Building Inspection and shall be qualified by either technical training or administrative experience in the enforcement of building and other construction codes. The Director shall serve as the building official of the City and County and, upon his or her appointment, shall assume all of the powers and duties of the Director of Public Works with respect to the administration and enforcement of the building code and other construction codes. The Director shall have all the powers provided for department heads as set forth in Section 3.501 of this Charter. The Director shall be appointed by the commission and hold office at its pleasure; the person who has civil service status in the position of Superintendent of the Bureau of Building Inspection on the date the commission assumes management of the department shall serve as interim Director pending the appointment of a Director by the commission. Subject to the approval of the commission, and the budgetary and fiscal provisions of this Charter, the Director shall have the power to appoint and remove, at his or her pleasure, up to one deputy superintendent and no more than two assistant superintendents, all of whom shall be exempt from the civil service provisions of this Charter.

   The Director shall not serve as an officer or member of any standing or ad hoc committee of any building industry or code development or enforcement organization or public agency other than the City and County of San Francisco without the prior approval of the Ccommission.

D3.750-3  SECRETARY OF COMMISSION; CONSULTANTS

   The Building Inspection Commission may appoint a secretary, which appointment shall not be subject to the civil service provisions of this Charter. Subject to the provisions of Section 6.302, 6.312 and 6.313 of this Charter, the commission may also contract with engineers or other consultants for such services as it may require. 

D3.750-4  POWERS AND DUTIES

   The Building Inspection Commission shall organize, reorganize, and manage the Department of Building Inspection which shall have responsibility for the enforcement, administration, and interpretation of the City’s Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, except where this Charter specifically grants that power to another department. The Central Permit Bureau, formerly within the Bureau of Building Inspection, shall also be managed by the commission.

   The commission shall inspect and regulate additions, alterations, and repairs in all buildings and structures covered by the San Francisco Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. Nothing in this chapter shall diminish or alter the jurisdiction of the Planning Department over changes of use or occupancy under the Planning Code. The commission shall ensure the provision of minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and the public welfare by regulating and controlling the safe use of such buildings and structures. The commission shall ensure the vigorous enforcement of City laws mandating the provision of heat and hot water to residential tenants. The commission shall also ensure the enforcement of local, state, and federal disability access laws. The commission shall be a policy-making and supervisory body with all the powers provided for in Section 3.500 of this Charter.

   The commission shall constitute the Abatement Appeals Board, and shall assume all powers granted to this entity under this Charter and the San Francisco Building Code. The commission shall appoint and may remove at its pleasure members of the Board of Examiners, Access Appeals Board, and Code Advisory Committee, all of which shall have the powers and duties to the extent set forth in the San Francisco Building Code.

   The commission shall have the power to hold hearings and hear appeals on all decisions made by the Department of Public Works regarding permits under one or more of the codes enumerated in this section and on sidewalk or encroachment permits. The commission may reverse, affirm or modify determinations made by the Department of Public Works, Water Department, or Department of Building Inspection on all permits required for a final certificate of completion. The commission’s jurisdiction under this section, however, shall not extend to permits appealable to the Planning Commission or Board of Permit Appeals. Departmental decisions on permits subject to commission review shall be made within the time mandates of the state Permit Streamlining Act. Appeals of decisions must be filed with the commission within fifteen days of the challenged determination. The commission shall act on the appeal within a reasonable time. The commission’s action shall be final.

D3.750-35  CODE PUBLICATIONACTIONS OF COMMISSION

The commission shall adopt rules and regulations consistent with fulfilling its responsibilities under this Charter. The commission shall also adopt rules and regulations governing commission meetings and also adopt requirements for notification and mailing for commission business. The commission shall hold public hearings on all proposed amendments to the San Francisco Building Code, Electrical Code, Housing Code, Plumbing Code, and Mechanical Code.

   The Building Inspection Commission shall have the sole authority to contract for the publication of the San Francisco Housing, Building, Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes, and any amendments thereto. Other provisions of this Charter and the Administrative Code notwithstanding, the selection of a publisher shall be based on the lowest retail cost to the public of a complete set of these codes.

   D3.750-46  APPROVAL OF BUDGETS

   The commission shall initially be funded out of the 1994-95 budget approved for the Bureau of Building Inspection, and subsequent funding shall come from the budget of the Department of Building Inspection.

   The Director of Building Inspection shall submit a proposed department budget for each upcoming fiscal year for approval by the Ccommission. The proposed budget shall be compiled in such detail as shall be required on uniform blanks furnished by the controller. The Building Inspection Commission must hold at least two public hearings on the respective budget proposal.

   The final budget for the Department of Building Inspection must be approved by a favorable vote of at least five commissioners.

D3.750-57  TECHNICAL BOARDS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES

   *   *   *   *

D3.750-68  SEVERABILITY

   *   *   *   *

Section 3.  Conflicting Ballot Measures.  In the event that this measure and another measure relating to the duties, composition, qualifications, and methods of appointment of members of the Building Inspection Commission appear on the same municipal election ballot, the provisions of such other measure shall be deemed in conflict with this measure.  In the event that this measure shall receive a greater number of affirmative votes than the other measure, the provisions of this measure shall prevail in their entirety and each and every provision of the other measure that  pertains to the Building Inspection Commission shall be null and void, to the extent it pertains to the Building Inspection Commission.

 

  • Local Ballot Measure and Argument Information
    • An Overview of San Francisco’s Debt
    • Words You Need to Know
    • Proposition A: Muni Reliability and Street Safety Bond
    • Proposition B: Building Inspection Commission
    • Proposition C: Recall Timelines and Vacancy Appointments
    • Proposition D: Office of Victim and Witness Rights; Legal Services for Domestic Violence Victims
    • Proposition E: Behested Payments
    • Proposition F: Refuse Collection and Disposal
    • Proposition G: Public Health Emergency Leave
    • Proposition H: Recall Measure Regarding Chesa Boudin

Follow Us!



© SF Department of Elections all rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

  • General Information
  • Candidate Information
  • Local Ballot Measures